Slashdot Mirror


Science's Alternative To an Intelligent Creator

Hugh Pickens writes "Discover magazine has an interesting article on the multiverse theory — a synthesis of string theory and the anthropic principle that explains why our universe seems perfectly tailored for life without invoking an intelligent creator. Our universe may be but one of perhaps infinitely many universes in an inconceivably vast multiverse. While most of those universes are barren, some, like ours, have conditions suitable for life. The idea that the universe was made just for us — known as the anthropic principle — debuted in 1973 when Brandon Carter proposed that a purely random assortment of laws would have left the universe dead and dark, and that life limits the values that physical constants can have. The anthropic principle languished on the fringes of science for years, but in 2000, new theoretical work threatened to unravel string theory when researchers calculated that the basic equations of string theory have an astronomical number of different possible solutions, perhaps as many as 101,000, with each solution representing a unique way to describe the universe. The latest iteration of string theory provides a natural explanation for the anthropic principle. If there are vast numbers of other universes, all with different properties, at least one of them ought to have the right combination of conditions to bring forth stars, planets, and living things." So far xkcd is simulating just one single universe.

22 of 683 comments (clear)

  1. imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    a universe without first posts

    1. Re:imagine by owlnation · · Score: 3, Funny

      The fact that first posts exist is conclusive proof that no-one is running the Universe.

    2. Re:imagine by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Funny

      SlashDeity.com Post comment:

      Name: ImaGod0001
      URL: http://www.thedivine.god/
      Subject: RE: How do you make a Universe?
      Comment: First post! Let there be light!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:imagine by hobbit · · Score: 5, Funny

      So it would seem: sometimes insightful, sometimes trollish, completely unaccountable and impossible to get answers from.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    4. Re:imagine by wastedlife · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even God cannot withstand a Slashdotting.

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    5. Re:imagine by pragma_x · · Score: 2, Funny

      I disagree.

      Its life Jim, but not as we know it.

  2. Re:This is news? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    I prefer my own Maniacal Egocentric Bastard Principle: I created the Universe, you guys are all just figments of my imagination. Muahahahahah!

  3. Re:Bang to Strings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's very simple. We began with Percussion (Big Bang), now we're moving toward Strings. Next will obviously be Brass and Woodwind. I don't care much who banged the drum or plucked the strings, who blew the brass or woodwinds. Whoever we're looking for, we know he'll have a musical degree and a conductor's baton.

  4. Re:the universe is 6000 years old by qmaqdk · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, the bible just counts mod 6001. Next year the universe will be 0 years old. Again.

    --
    My UID is prime. Hah!
  5. Re:Just Two Things by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 2, Funny

    And third, unless you have an observation, which for the moment I'll describe as "a number and a unit of measure which can (at least in theory) be independently checked by someone else", you're not doing science. As this "theory" of multiverses proposes (infinitely?) many parallel worlds which we cannot observe in any way, it's not a science at all. It's just another religion made up by people who want to avoid using that word.

    <img src="images/WHARRGARBL.jpg">

  6. Re:First Post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry, you're in the wrong universe, try that one over there.

  7. Re:There is no God? by Qetu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yep, all those scientists are just trying to disprove god. The research is just a nice byproduct.

  8. Re:Perfectly tailored to life? by usul294 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well then why don't we all join up to fight the power of the so called "universe" who is trying to kill us all.

  9. As many as 101,000 Solutions? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are they sure it's not 101010 solutions? That would be "42" in binary.....

  10. Re:Again by Cow+Jones · · Score: 2, Funny

    Any anyway, "Science" already has a better "alternative to an intelligent creator".

    All hail to His Noodly Appendages!
    (it's been proven by Science!)

    RAmen.

    --

    Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
  11. Re:This is news? by Napoleon+The+Pig · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me?

  12. Re:The anthropic principle isn't a principle. by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Funny

    "the idea of this universe being particularly suited to life" ... And if there are multiple parallel universes, then in all universes that are not suited to life, there will be no life to ask, "why isn't this universe suited to life". So only in the universes that are suited to life, could there be lifeforms asking, why is this universe suited to life.

    Asking therefore "that the universe was made just for us", is clearly totally wrong. Its not about us at all. Its just that life can survive and exist in this universe.

    Imagine how tough it would be if we were to live in one of those Universes that were not suitable for life! I guess we should thank God that he put us in this one.

    Phew!

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  13. Re:This is news? by consequentemente · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is solipsistic in here, but it I'm pretty sure it's just me.

  14. Re:First Post? by dword · · Score: 2, Funny

    You've posted in the wrong Universe, silly!

  15. Re:My brane hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    10^1000 is not an astronomic number. It's a financial one.

  16. God is a scientist by IchNiSan · · Score: 2, Funny

    He had a theory that intelligent life was possible, and then devised an experiment to test it. This involved creating an infinite number of universes, so that the standards for the development of intelligent life could be met.

    Sadly, so far this experiment has been a failure. The only reason we are still here to post about it is because God's garbage collection is nearly as bad as ours is sometimes.

  17. Re:God by Lazyrust · · Score: 5, Funny
    In the first universe, God created people, intelligent and curious people. But he didnt create science. So instead of people praying to God to fix their marriage, save their dog, help them win the lottery, , they prayed to him asking him "why?" and after hearing "why?" about 12*10^1000000 time, God said.. "Christ on a crutch, I cant take this whiny 'why?' shit anymore!" So he destroyed that universe. And created this universe, and God said "ok, screw that praying to me and asking me "why?" shit over and over. I'll give them science. Then they can ask themselves that question. And leave me alone. So I can get Season 4 of Seinfeld done finally and send it back to Netflix."

    Then, a few trillion years later, God finished every season of Gunsmoke, (all 633 episodes) thanks to TV Land reruns. And people were whining about science, so he said "What the hells wrong with these people? They keep whining to me about how science is wrong. I better do something about this, or I'll never get through all the episodes of Lassie." So he created Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda, and Slashdot was born. The whining moved to Slashdot comments and God said, "This is good."