Slashdot Mirror
Grenade-Style Wireless Camera For Combat
nk497 writes "A new wireless camera called the I-Ball is being developed to be shot into locations using a grenade launcher so troops can see what lies ahead. The I-Ball sends real-time, 360-degree video back to soldiers while it's flying through the air and when it lands."
Why not just shoot the grenades in there. Then you'll know what lies ahead (bodies).
"I don't have to think. I only have to do it. The results are always perfect, but that's old news." - Meat Puppets
From TFA:
âoeWe have overcome some significant technological challenges in developing the I-Ball technology,â said Paul Thompson of Dreampact. âoeAlthough it is in its early stages, we are very excited about the technology's potential to help our troops to be better prepared for battle.â
In other words, "We had an idea, and we've got no idea how to actually implement it, but if the MoD gives us a bunch of money we'll happily spend it."
Maybe the UK MoD is better than the US DoD about not funding projects just because some legislator is owed a favor, but I wouldn't bet on it.
I sure hope these things are less than $100... hell, less than $10 for that matter. I sure as hell don't think we need to waste that kind of money on stuff the enemy might take home as a souvenir.
"Why can't we all just get along?!" I'd rather see research and development dollars spent making war and conflict obsolete.
At the moment, most of the conflict where it is "the world" vs. the U.S.A., seems to be stemming from ridiculous policies that no one can fully explain. Why do we care about the "spread of communism"? Why do we care about "defending Israel"? There are a lot of humanitarian causes far more dire and we leave those tragedies alone with a clear conscience. Can someone tell me why we spend SO much money and so many human lives on "expanding democracy" and "defending Israel"?
What, nobody uses Google Earth anymore?
Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
If I was developing a hardened, spherical wireless camera, I'd have many more uses for it than killing people. The entertainment possibilities alone are immense. Hopefully we'll see this deployed on the field of play before the battlefield.
politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
one-eyed san francisco artist looking for the tech that will allow her to put a webcam in her eye socket:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/15/2008-11-15_san_francisco_artist_looks_to_replace_lo.html
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
I was assuming that infantry soldiers would use it after they shot up a building. It would be nice to see what damage you inflicted before going in. By that time the folks inside probably have a good idea that they have visitors. The article itself seemed jsut as focused on armor which you generally do not use to sneak up on anybody.
Forget that. I just want to know if it will blend.
There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
Mod "2005 called they want their memes back."
1976 called and Richard Dawkins wants his meme meme back.
Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
...sensitive equipment on site, element of surprise, recon mission...
The list is long.
Are you one of those guys that, when playing Counterstrike, chucks grenades inside killing all the hostages and then runs into the room spraying it with bullets, only to be knifed in the head once you run out of ammo?
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
I see televised golf tournaments becoming much more interesting.
Have gnu, will travel.
It really bothers me to hear an adult use the term "bad guy" to refer to a real person. It seems to be a recent American trend. Bad guys are characters found in silly action films and fairy tales.
and we still keep bombing the shit out of wedding parties, so why go to the extra expense of the camera?