Slashdot Mirror


Physicist Admits Sending Space-Related Military Secrets To China

piemcfly writes "Chinese-born physicist Shu Quan-Sheng Monday pleaded guilty before a US court to violating the Arms Export Control Act by illegally exporting American military space know-how to China. The 68-year-old naturalized US citizen, pictured here on his company profile, admitted handing over the design of fueling systems between 2003 and 2007. Also, in 2003 he illegally exported a document with the impossibly long name of 'Commercial Information, Technical Proposal and Budgetary Officer — Design, Supply, Engineering, Fabrication, Testing & Commissioning of 100m3 Liquid Hydrogen Tank and Various Special Cryogenic Pumps, Valves, Filters and Instruments.' This contained the design of liquid hydrogen tanks for space launch vehicles. He also admitted to a third charge of bribing Chinese officials to the tune of some 189,300 dollars for a French space technology firm." Here's the FBI press release regarding Shu's plea.

51 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Industrial espionage by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Eh, it's nothing new. But given that certain cultures are more about "honor" and "loyalty" than others are, then why do they let this happen? I find it hard to believe that Chinamen are the only men capable of performing certain engineering duties. I doubt that anybody of American descent would be allowed to see top-secret Chinese data, 20-year citizen or not!

    Unless the FBI is simply foaming at the mouth to create FUD and bungle this like they bungle everything else. It's more of a matter of industrial espionage rather than national security.

    1. Re:Industrial espionage by internerdj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is the problem with not properly promoting scientific education within American schools. If you can't get good scientists internally then you are putting your secure projects at risk.

    2. Re:Industrial espionage by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Funny

      I find it hard to believe that Chinamen ...

      Also, Ethanol-fueled, 'Chinamen' is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian Americans, please.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    3. Re:Industrial espionage by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This isn't a guy who built the railroads here. This is a guy who stole our secrets!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Industrial espionage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, the chinaman is not the issue here!

    5. Re:Industrial espionage by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you can't get good scientists internally then you are putting your secure projects at risk.

      Umm, wasn't he a naturalized American citizen? Or do you mean to suggest that it's a risk to employ anyone who wasn't a natural-born citizen on secure projects? This traitorous asshole notwithstanding, most immigrants to this country are fiercely patriotic. You tend to have an appreciation for the United States if you immigrate here from a poorer/more oppressive country -- whereas those of us who were born here tend to take what we have for granted.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Industrial espionage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correction, those of us who were born here and didn't take the responsibility ourselves to educate... OURSELVES!

      I hardly take what I have for granted, but I read a lot about how we got to where we are today. You know, that thing called history that the people you are really referring to ignore completely and pretend it has no relevance to today.

      I wouldn't let this one bad apple ruin the bushel. People seem to forget some of our greatest scientists EVER were defectors from our old enemies like, you know, Nazi Germany.

    7. Re:Industrial espionage by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is the problem with not properly promoting scientific education within American schools. If you can't get good scientists internally then you are putting your secure projects at risk.

      It's a mixed bag. For every foreign-born turncoat you can find, I can find you one who is loyal to the US because he has a huge beef with whoever is running the show back home. Likewise, for every loyal native-born son of liberty I can show you a homegrown turncoat. Look at all the moles in the CIA, corn-fed Americans.

      The moral of the story is that there's no rule of thumb to go by on who you can trust, you need to suspect everyone and not make theft any easier than it has to be. Most of these cases, nobody's sitting there giving the spy props because he pulled off some sort of James Bond stunt, it's usually hands slapped against faces as we realize the doors were left wide open, the only mystery is why even more secrets didn't walk out of there.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    8. Re:Industrial espionage by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      People seem to forget some of our greatest scientists EVER were defectors from our old enemies like, you know, Nazi Germany.

      It's not exactly rocket science, as Werner Von Braun once said.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Industrial espionage by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's probably as close as you could get to a possible Manchurian Candidate (one parent foreign, raised a large part of "formative" years on foreign soil), and yet I doubt you'll find anyone who would possibly think that way.

      Unless you watch Fox News ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    10. Re:Industrial espionage by Toll_Free · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, let's bow down to "Asian American" today.

      Tomorrow it will be "Person of Asian Decent, probably of Chinese".

      Chinamen only serves to convey a person of a certain area.

      This "politically correct" crap has to end. You can't have a different "cultural" name every oh, half decade or so.

      Should we call them "American's of Chinese Decent".

      PuhLeeze. People getting irate over being called a Chinaman, when they come from China is lame. I can see it if he called them a "Chink", "Slant Eye" or something else.

      Or should I get pissed when someone calls me an American Man?

      Sheesh.

      --Toll_Free

    11. Re:Industrial espionage by yog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct, someone is misusing "defect" here. The Soviets were more fearsome enemies than the Allies. The German scientists obviously concluded that helping the Allies in the post-WWII era would be better for Germany than helping the USSR (or doing nothing).

      Indeed, history shows that Von Braun and the others did the right thing by siding with the U.S. Western Germany was protected by the American nuclear umbrella and allowed to prosper while its Soviet half withered.

      Germany has never really recovered its pre-war aerospace prowess. At one time, they made the best fighter jets, the best rockets, and pretty much the best in every engineering and medical field, and after the war they just lost it, as though they were afraid to excel in these fields anymore.

      As for the Chinese, I agree with a previous poster that this is more of a case of industrial espionage than actual treason. But, military and industry are intimately connected in China, perhaps more than in the U.S., and any rocket tech that they acquire will almost certainly be put to military use.

      The Chinese are so hungry for technology and they are acquiring it so rapidly even as the U.S. declines in industrial and scientific ability that it seems only a matter of time before they basically take over as the world super power, while the U.S. degenerates into a post-industrial welfare state like France or Britain.

      If China were a democracy with some real checks and balances, this might be OK, but unfortunately they have not evolved their system to that level yet. Even the U.S. makes mistakes, but the pendulum does swing and there is a sense of accountability that simply doesn't exist in China yet.

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    12. Re:Industrial espionage by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In order for it to work, you have to have loyalties somewhere else. If you are elected as the most powerful man in the world, I'm not sure what on earth would tempt you to "sell out", particularly to some dirt ball in the middle east. If you're crooked, you have all the power in the world to set up your own nice retirement...I think we can think of a few examples of that.

      For a poor American scientist, there's a lot to be had back in China, or pretty much anywhere else, whether you are of chinese descent or not. We produce so few scientists and engineers, because the rewards are so pathetic for the capacity of work being done. Within our own country, various silly IP and anti-workforce laws protect investors from our knowledge and abilities moving to competitors easily (also forcing salaries down). But outside of our borders? Not so much. Reverse brain drain, and it's friend "espionage" are real problems. All we need is money, and we can recreate anything we've done before, and probably do it better.

      In the 8 years I've been employed, this is the 3rd time I've heard of naturalized Chinese citizens sending back design data to the motherland. Having known personally one of the people later convicted, loyalty to "the party" had nothing to do with it. He was disgruntled at being laid off, believed in his product (but not his company), and was sending design files to his buddy back home so they could start their own business. Illegal, yes. Seditious? Not intentionally.

      The saddest part is, that's how the US got its foot in the door. The British didn't really care for us all that much back then, and wanted us kept out of the loop, but had much the same problem with its industry as we do now. Enter a lowly engineer who had know how, but not $
      (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Slater)

      It's a shame when history repeats itself, particularly since the US was founded on better ideals than China. What on earth do we stand to gain by promoting a country that, other than rabid capitalism (with a phony communist mouthpiece), is the anti-thesis to our way of life?

    13. Re:Industrial espionage by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This reminds me of a pretty egregious faux-pas in the character customization menus in the recent Fallout game. Basically, amid the extensive options available for tweaking your character, there was initially (right after gender) a "race" option. The options were something like:

      1) Caucasian
      2) Asian
      3) African American

      Coming from outside the US, this ranks as one of my top ten "WTF?" moments in video gaming. I knew that Americans were fairly insular, but to define an entire racial group as "XXXican American" struck me a particularly flagrant example of classic American ignorance. To wit; There are black people who have never been to America, whos ancestors have never been to America, and who probably never will go to America so long as they live. Many may not even know where America is. Similarly for "Asian Americans".

      This kind of Americanization of even very basic things is quite frightening sometimes. It's scary to think just how much of the culture, laws, practices and viewpoints in my own country have their origins in a country with a very different mindset and world view. The politics of Middle America seems to end up in my living room whether I like it or not.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    14. Re:Industrial espionage by FingerSoup · · Score: 2

      Well, it's NOT about the composition of the words, it's about the connotation. The Chinaman slur has the same connotation as if you went to China and everyone called you White-boy... It might technically be correct, but in most connotations it's derogatory. Just because it's less offensive than Chink, doesn't mean it's not offensive.

      There's nothing wrong with saying someone is Chinese, or Chinese-American. Asian-American is less correct than that, Because Indians are South-Asian, thus still Asian, thus nondescript. And of course I mean REAL Indians, not native North Americans.

    15. Re:Industrial espionage by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know, man. The name of that project sure indicates he was born for government work:

      > the impossibly long name of 'Commercial Hydrogen Instrumentation Nomenclature
      > Affairs Reacquisition Officer -- Onboard Liquid Supplies Using Special
      > Distillation Resevoir of Oleaginous Oxygen Lysimetrification System'

      He worked on that? Lol.

      Zomg, look:

      Commercial
      Hydrogen
      Instrumentation
      Nomenclature
      Affairs
      Reacquisition
      Officer --
      Onboard
      Liquid
      Supplies
      Using
      Special
      Distillation
      Resevoir of
      Oleaginous
      Oxygen
      Lysimetrification
      System

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    16. Re:Industrial espionage by Koreantoast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, being born on American soil is hardly a good indicator of loyalty. After all, the most damaging of American spies in recent history weren't foreign immigrants from Asia but Caucasian, American-born males from the heartland. People like Robert Hanssen of Chicago or Aldrich Ames of River Falls, Wisconsin.

    17. Re:Industrial espionage by novakyu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So while someone who has been in this country for 20+ years may have the flag flying in their yard and be all "Go USA!" that doesn't change the fact that it would still be easier to get them to give up secrets than a US born.

      And that's because natural-born citizens never sell secrets to enemies, right?

      I agree that having families in oppressive countries is a liability—but, surely the U.S. government can help remove those liabilities (by shortening their immigration process) so that they can hire a qualified man for the job?

    18. Re:Industrial espionage by smellsofbikes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only him: more than one third of American Nobel Prize winners are immigrants. Many of our best and brightest, and, as people who have worked in agriculture and construction can tell you, many of the hardest-working and most dedicated, are immigrants.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    19. Re:Industrial espionage by LaskoVortex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We produce so few scientists and engineers, because the rewards are so pathetic for the capacity of work being done.

      We produce an ample supply of scientists given appropriate compensation. As we import more scientists from other countries, wages go down because supply goes up. This will drive Americans out of science and into more lucrative careers. A scientist used to expect to get a faculty position at about 28 to 30 in this country. Now the average is about 38. As we import more scientists, this number will only go up because the imported labor makes it easier to have a larger worker to PI ratio and a larger pool of workers translates into greater and more protracted competition for PI positions.

      So what does this mean to all of the kids out there trying to choose a major? Well, as a public service, I will tell them: STAY THE FUCK OUT OF SCIENCE UNLESS YOU KNOW FOR GODDAMN SURE THAT YOU WILL BE PERFECTLY HAPPY RUNNING EXPERIMENTS FOR SOMEONE ELSE FOR MUCH OF YOUR LIFE.

      The dream of having a PI position before you turn gray died in the '80s.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    20. Re:Industrial espionage by Sinbios · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a shame when history repeats itself, particularly since the US was founded on better ideals than China.

      Is "freedom and liberty for all!" really better ideals than "wealth and security for all!"? I think they both just cater to different value systems and happened to be convenient for rabble-rousing at the time.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    21. Re:Industrial espionage by MikeBabcock · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The entire country is founded on immigration obviously, aside from the natives who got mostly wiped out that is.

      Believing immigration is bad for America is just navel gazing stupidity. There are no 20th generation American Citizens, from long lines of American ancestry. There are however thousands of years of Chinese dynastic and other histories.

      To cut off immigration is to say "we have enough people now" since everyone else is recently immigrated too (from a global historical perspective). There is no otherwise functional difference between the immigrant and the naturally born citizen.

      Who bombed the FBI building in Oklahoma after all? A chinaman? Maybe a Russian spy? Yeah.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    22. Re:Industrial espionage by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree entirely with you, but would like to quibble on one minor point. The first guy to bear my last name on North American soil got here 15 generations ago, while two of my grandparents escaped from pre-WWII Germany, so I'm fairly typical. But I dated a lovely woman a few years back whose ancestors were all Cherokee or Paiute, as far as she knew, so while they obviously weren't American citizens back 8000 years ago, they have a lot, a whole, whole lot, to say about what happens to the neighborhood when you let people immigrate. (Mostly joking, of course.)

      The other thing that occurs to me, looking around where I work, is that there *is* somewhat of a difference between immigrants and naturally born citizens: all our naturalized or work visa employees have PhD's where I work, and none of our natural-born citizens do.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  2. Outsourcing by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe outsourcing the US military to China wouldn't be a bad thing after all.

    1. Re:Outsourcing by Thanshin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Naa, for rocket science I'd outsource to India.

  3. A crime called 'Treason'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Only a few years ago, this would be called 'TREASON' and possible punishment could be death, but more likely life imprisonment.

    What say he goes free...

    1. Re:A crime called 'Treason'. by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Meh, it's not like rockets can be weaponized or anything.

      On a more serious not, this stuff is all for liquid hydrogen rockets - that wouldn't make a very effective weapon... it does a fine job in the Space Shuttle main engine, but keeping rockets that run on liquid hydrogen flight-ready is pretty expensive. AFAIK, most of the US military rockets are solid fuel.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:A crime called 'Treason'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed wholeheartedly. Treason is a very appropriate designation here, IMHO.

      He is a US citizen who used that privilege to gain access to secure information and willfully sold us out! His actions profoundly harmed our national interests, diminished our technological advantages over our adversaries, caused immeasurable economic harm, and may very well cost the lives of countless numbers of our fellow countrymen in future conflicts!!! Furthermore, in this case there is EVERY reason to believe that he knew EXACTLY what he was doing!

      THIS IS TREASON, and HAPPENS WAY TOO OFTEN with little real consequence. EVERY American should be pissed as hell about this, and (in my opinion) a very public example needs to be made EVERY time something like this happens.

    3. Re:A crime called 'Treason'. by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well, even if they are stealing rocket technology from the West, they're just getting us back.

      the Chinese were the first to invent rockets, which were later stolen by the Mongols, who then spread it to the Arabs, who eventually spread it to the West. i guess that makes us even now.

      most scientific & technological advancements are built on top of the work done by previous scientists/inventors/engineers. and the history of human technological/scientific progress is essentially the story of the spread of knowledge through cultural exchange. the sharing of knowledge and technology between cultures has always been a major stimulus for technological & scientific innovation. that's why non-weapons-related technology export restrictions are kinda silly. no developed nation can say that their technological & scientific achievements are the sole work of their nation, and their nation alone. many IP laws are similarly silly as such jealous guarding of knowledge, or "intellectual property," is not only petty but counter-productive to societal progress.

  4. Only 10 years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What happened to treason?

  5. Individuals can't but corporations can? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder how many corporations , universities and other organizations routinely share and profit from the global movement of information? When was the last time you saw a multinational corporation become the target for these types of investigations?

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending the guy, personally, I just think all this secrecy is stupid, useless and evil.

  6. hmmm. by apodyopsis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would say that china has many good research engineers to get new technology - but from my time working there I would say that industrial espionage and reverse engineering are perfectly acceptable methods to get new technology over there. I have seen new chips turn up that once decapped and FIB'd were seen to be *exact* copies of designs from the firm I worked for, complete with the same faults - but that's what you get for using a Chinese fab.

    As always I am interested in this from a general viewpoint - I mean how many hours R&D is worth the hassle of paying for? obviously if something has been developed for many years and represents significant innovation it would be worthwhile, but they seem to be after anything.

    It reminds me of the Tupelov 144 and Bakinor shuttle - both of which were uncannily close to planes developed elsewhere...

    1. Re:hmmm. by frieko · · Score: 5, Informative

      Karma whoring here.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu-144
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buran_(spacecraft)
      Interesting reads both. As I understand it the aerodynamic shapes were copied from photos, but the guts were completely different.

    2. Re:hmmm. by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ANd it will not be population. It will be about water and resources

      Well, population comes into play because Russia has a declining population and the largest territory on Earth. How do you hold onto that territory in the long run if your birth rate is below the replacement rate?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  7. False dichotomy there, bub by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless the FBI is simply foaming at the mouth to create FUD and bungle this like they bungle everything else. It's more of a matter of industrial espionage rather than national security.

    If the Chinese got ahold of that new laser weapon system from Northrop Grumman, I doubt you would make such a neat little dichotomy there between industrial espionage and national security.

    The Chinese government is actually quite hostile to the United States and many other countries. Just look at what they're doing to Africa if you have any doubts as to whether or not this is a country you want having technology that can be used to assist them in becoming a credible player in space on a military footing.

    This Physicist should probably be executed or imprisoned for life if there is any way to get such a sentence. In a more honest time, what he did would be considered treason in spirit, if not exactly the letter of the law.

    One of the things that keeps us safe, and keeps us from fighting long, protracted wars is the fact that other countries have a damned hard time competing with us technologically on the battlefield. The Chinese have, for a long time, been trying to steal said technology from us. They really ramped it up after the first Persian Gulf War when their soldiers actually got to see what our technology could do when we unleashed a largescale attack on another country with our new weapon systems. One of the most effective ways for us to prevent a war is to make betraying military applicable technologies to their government an offense that most of these guys would never commit because the punishment is so severe.

    1. Re:False dichotomy there, bub by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can already predict that some snarky asshole is going to come along and say "long, protracted wars like Iraq." The answer is no. Try the sort of wars where both parties are actually on a generally equal footing, where hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, of soldiers end up dead. One of the reasons that governments like the Chinese government don't risk war with us is that they know that with our currently superior equipped and trained military, we can inflict devastating and likely very disproportionate casualties on them. If they are successful at industrial espionage, they close the gap there between our respective militaries and can come much closer to going toe-to-toe with our troops any day of the week.

      Being generally anti-war, I tend to be of the opinion that Roosevelt was right when he said we should walk softly and carry a big stick. That big stick isn't so intimidating when you let your enemy have one of his very own modeled on yours.

    2. Re:False dichotomy there, bub by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative

      what he did would be considered treason in spirit, if not exactly the letter of the law.

      Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

      Maybe even under the letter of the law. 'Aid and Comfort'

      One of the most effective ways for us to prevent a war is to make betraying military applicable technologies to their government an offense that most of these guys would never commit because the punishment is so severe.

      They'll still do it. People commit espionage for a variety of reasons. And the punishments are already pretty severe -- personally I'd rather be executed than spend the rest of my natural life in 23 hour a day solitary confinement at Florence ADX. The reason that most spies don't get the death penalty is because they agree to a life sentence in exchange for revealing how much information they gave away.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:False dichotomy there, bub by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can already predict that some snarky asshole is going to come along and say "long, protracted wars like Iraq." The answer is no. Try the sort of wars where both parties are actually on a generally equal footing, where hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, of soldiers end up dead. One of the reasons that governments like the Chinese government don't risk war with us is that they know that with our currently superior equipped and trained military, we can inflict devastating and likely very disproportionate casualties on them. If they are successful at industrial espionage, they close the gap there between our respective militaries and can come much closer to going toe-to-toe with our troops any day of the week.

      1. Our military is over-extended already. It's unlikely we even have enough spare troops to invade Guam again at this point.
      2. There's no possible scenario I can think of that would see us facing down China in a ground battle.
      3. Economic warfare seems to be a far smarter arena to be engaged in than direct military conflict. And they have us over the barrel in that regard.
      4. There's a difference between a bombing campaign and a ground invasion of given territory. All the high tech in the world doesn't count for much if you are fighting against an entrenched enemy on home turf. Witness how easily we smoked the standing Iraqi army in both Gulf wars versus the trouble we're facing trying to police cities filled with guerrillas.

      The struggle we're looking at right now is over access to markets and resources. Granted, the future is always in flux but the prospects for a large-scale industrial war the likes of WWII are extremely remote. 4th generation guerrilla wars seem to be the likely scenario for as far into the future as we can reasonably gaze.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:False dichotomy there, bub by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Informative

      And you can trust that information 100%

      Eh, it depends on the underlying motivation they had for committing espionage. The FBI had something called 'MICE' during the Cold War -- Money, Ideology, Coercion, and Ego -- it was meant to explain the reasonings behind why someone would commit espionage.

      Someone who committed espionage because they were blackmailed (coercion) by the foreign power would be less likely to lie about their activities when caught than someone who committed it for idealogical reasons (i.e: they actually believe in the political system of our adversary). In any case, I'm sure that any information from confessed spies is taken with a grain of salt and verified through other sources wherever possible. At the end of the day I'm sure you can see the wisdom in having a living breathing source of information as opposed to a dead corpse.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:False dichotomy there, bub by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Our military is over-extended already. It's unlikely we even have enough spare troops to invade Guam again at this point.

      And? People tend to forget that in 1941 we had a smaller army than Portugal and a nearly non-existent Air Force. The only branch of the armed forces that was remotely ready for war was the US Navy. My concern with our military being over-extended is not that we'd lose a large-scale industrial war -- it's that we'd lose the the opportunity to nip a problem in the bud before it became a large-scale industrial war.

      There's no possible scenario I can think of that would see us facing down China in a ground battle.

      What possible scenario could you think of in 1920 that would see us facing down Germany and Italy in a ground battle?

      Economic warfare seems to be a far smarter arena to be engaged in than direct military conflict. And they have us over the barrel in that regard.

      How do they have us over the barrel? Economics is a two-way street. If we stop buying their exports they lose the incoming capital that they need to pull their hundreds of millions of rural poor out of poverty. They'd wind up being hurt at least as much (if not more so) as we would.

      Witness how easily we smoked the standing Iraqi army in both Gulf wars versus the trouble we're facing trying to police cities filled with guerrillas.

      We're facing that trouble because we didn't go into the country with enough force to fight a proper counter-insurgency operation. And they aren't really guerrillas in the classical sense -- a lot (most?) of the violence is Iraqi on Iraqi as competing interests vie for power. It's closer to a civil war than a guerrilla war.

      Granted, the future is always in flux but the prospects for a large-scale industrial war the likes of WWII are extremely remote.

      What are you basing that on? WWII didn't happen in a vacuum. The first thing that happened was the economic rug got pulled out from under the globe -- sound familiar?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:False dichotomy there, bub by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you want to consider China an enemy, and think "Aid and Comfort" is enough to convict for treason then you'd better start by locking up the board of Wal-Mart. Then have a look at the contents of your house and wardrobe and decide whether to turn yourself in.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  8. Re:Spare me by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Chinaman is a direct translation of äåoeä. When in "Greater China", I get damned tired of constantly being called å-åoeä and éè±ä".

    I agree, those slurs are tired and racist. Plus, it's also difficult to tell if someone is talking to you or screaming in agony.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  9. The odds against him being caught are huge by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't claim any personal experience with counter-intelligence but everything I've read on the matter makes the feebs out to be completely incompetent jackasses. Potential intelligence assets will walk in the front door and the FBI and CIA couldn't manage to recognize them for what they were. It seems like the operative rules are along the lines of:

    1. First, don't fuck up.
    2. Doing things increases the chances of fucking up; the less you do, the less likely you fuck up, unless your fuck up was not doing anything.
    3. Your primary enemy is other intelligence services competing for your budget and turf. Cut those bastards off at the knees.
    4. In your spare time, see if any foreign agents might be up to something.

    For a case in point, Operation Pastorius.

    http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=949

    German defectors walk right up to the FBI and the G-men had to be beaten over the head before they realized something was up. And Hoover, ugh, don't even get me started on that bastard. The Brits couldn't stand working with that transvestite media whore in WWII. No sooner would a German agent be sniffed out and the FBI would roll him up and bring in the pressmen so German intel could find out their operation was blown and there would be enough details blabbed to the press so the Germans would know how they were sniffed out. The Brit approach was to figure out who the agents were, then keep a close eye on who they associated with so they could discover the larger spy network. They would also use these agents to unwittingly feed bogus intel back into German hands. That that was all too subtle for the swinging dick approach favored by American intel.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  10. There is an old saying in China... by Vexler · · Score: 2, Informative

    We Chinese have an old saying that dates back to the Opium War. Back then we were called the "Sick Man of the Far East", because of the number of people addicted to opium which the British had imported. Later on it became "Copycat of the Far East" because of the many, many ways that China tries to imitate the West through technology, culture, fashion, music, and so on. (Think of just how much software and music are copied and distributed without any regard to proper royalties and licensing and you can begin to get a sense of the pervasiveness of this cultural trait.)

    Understandably, neither label is a source of pride in the Chinese culture, but as with all cultural stereotypes and epithets, these have some truth in them.

  11. But China is America's friend! by OutSourcingIsTreason · · Score: 2, Funny

    To paraphrase Nobel economist Paul Krugman, China supplies the US poisonous toys and in return the US supplies China with fraudulent securities.

    --
    "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Mussolini
  12. Re:String Him UP! by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The real problem, the thing that makes China scary and has people talking about treason and execution in this case is this: deep down we're afraid we've lost our technology balls.

    It's been 36 years since America has been to the Moon. An entire generation has been born since then, and have even had their own children. I remember watching Neil Armstrong take that first step on the Moon, an event that to my children that is like my parents talking about Pearl Harbor is to me. Space, to them, is a place where movies are set. The Space Shuttle program was a disappointment, and the Mars initiative is a transparent boondoggle with no significant program milestones on the calendar.

    In my lifetime, I have watched the leveraged buyout of the American culture of invention. When I was a kid, America was a country that made things. Of the course of my adulthood, it became something remarkable when a thing was actually made here. Then we were a country that invented things that were made elsewhere, and that is still true, but for how long? The idea of free trade is that countries do what "they do best"; it's a good idea in theory, but in practice our role in the world economy has become to spend the accumulated gains of generations, to send investment overseas.

    The idea that we can somehow protect our preeminence in the world by hoarding our past accomplishments is pathetic. Oh, I won't deny that this kind of thing doesn't help China somewhat, otherwise why would they do it? But if you could wave a magic wand and make all these sort things go away, it wouldn't make much difference at all.

    China is pursuing technological and economic development, whereas we have become complacent. We have been acting in the last two decades as if national preeminence is not simply a legacy but a birthright.

    So we get all worked up about cases like this, because it gives us an excuse for our own lack of initiative and vision. We have elected leaders who pandered to our laziness and anti-intellectualism, and mocked the thoughtful as out of touch, the visionary as insane. We have embraced hypocrisy, insisting the poor should shoulder their economic responsibilities, which is fine by me, but all the while demanding middle class prerogatives as our entitlement. I remember watching a movie in which people were singing that things were so wonderful in America because it is "God's Country", and cringing at the idea that some poor bastard in the third world was watching his children starve because God doesn't like him as much as he likes us. That kind of thinking is more in style today than ever.

    Oh, I won't be surprised if lots of people want to hang this guy. That's what passes these days for "feel good" politics.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  13. What "military space know-how"? by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What "military space know-how"? No US weapons system uses liquid hydrogen tanks.

    The Saturn V used liquid hydrogen, and the Shuttle does, but those are NASA programs. Unmanned boosters are usually solids, or the old standard, liquid oxygen and kerosene, like the V2 from WWII. ICBMs have been all solid-fuel since the 1970s. And according to the Outer Space Treaty, the US isn't supposed to have weapons in space.

    There's no military threat. The only reason to limit the export of liquid hydrogen tank technology is to slow down the Chinese manned space program.

    1. Re:What "military space know-how"? by dwye · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What "military space know-how"? No current US weapons system uses liquid hydrogen tanks, that I know about.

      Fixed it for you.

      The only reason to limit the export of liquid hydrogen tank technology is to slow down the Chinese manned space program.

      Because the Chinese would never use what they have, rather than exactly copying an American design that they will not have all of until years from now.

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. Re:It is wrong to generalise but by dwye · · Score: 2, Informative

    > It might be interesting to look at German-Americans in 1930s

    Bundists were a problem, until war was actually declared. Then, the majority became as patriotic as anyone else. Of course, the worst ones went home "when the Fuehrer called all good Germans back to the Fatherland." to quote Band Of Brothers (at least the movie - haven't read most of the book, yet). Mostly providing public information, suitably correlated, rather than "secret plans" or classified military info.

    Also, as many 1st and 2nd generation Japanese of military age wanted to be sent back to Japan (once we started repatriation from the internment camps) as enlisted in the 442nd, the all-Japanese soldier regiment.

    Italians tended to be better, but most were from lower Italy, which missed any good from Il Duce.

  16. Re:WTF?!..... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Funny

    -10 years per count violation of AECA, and 5 years per count violation of FCPA?!?!?!?

    Dude, it's not like he was selling pot or anything horrendous like that.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)