Slashdot Mirror


Debian Packages Screenshots Repository Launched

Christoph Haas writes "A picture is worth a thousand words. And thanks to screenshots.debian.net this finally comes true for Debian packages. The new website was launched just a week ago and has already collected screenshots for 740 packages shipping with the Linux distribution — with new uploads pouring in every hour. Debian users can finally get an impression of how an application would look before installing it."

17 of 72 comments (clear)

  1. Great, but needs guidelines. by pwnies · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Great idea, but it needs some guidelines. Styling being the most obvious one (no I don't want to see how it looks using the custom skin you made that shows off several varieties of wood), but much more importantly is libraries. If you have a look through their "things needing screenshots" section, you'll notice that it's full of libs, many of which have no interface at all. That being the case, why are they there? Seems to me like all the data here needs some garbage collection and more rigid guidelines.

    1. Re:Great, but needs guidelines. by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Informative

      Great idea, but it needs some guidelines.

      Yeah, guidelines like these would be great.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    2. Re:Great, but needs guidelines. by Dwedit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On Windows, you can always make up a screenshot of any DLL file by opening it in Dependency Walker, and listing the functions exported by the DLL. I'm sure there has to be something similar for Linux.

    3. Re:Great, but needs guidelines. by Daimanta · · Score: 4, Informative

      True, but most of the open-source programs begin this way. Hackish and just working as the developers want it. After that you get feature enchancements and discussions about implementation of functionality. I expect that the lib picture problem is full resolved in a month or 3.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    4. Re:Great, but needs guidelines. by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Wow, 800x600 resolution is pretty harsh. Nobody uses that as a desktop resolution anymore, so every screenshot will be resized, and harder to read. They really should try to support a decent resolution, 1024x768 at a bare minimum.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Great, but needs guidelines. by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or you could just take a screengrab of a single window. There are only two windows usually on my desktop larger than 800x600: my browser and a text editor.

    6. Re:Great, but needs guidelines. by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hard to enter information in on application that requires you to be examining the other application, if they arn't both on screen at once.

      Different kinds of work require different layouts.

      Also, just because you use your windows maximized, doesn't mean you can't dial that back to take a screenshot. If your widgets can't handle a resize, said application has some issues...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:Great, but needs guidelines. by kv9 · · Score: 4, Informative

      On Windows, you can always make up a screenshot of any DLL file by opening it in Dependency Walker, and listing the functions exported by the DLL. I'm sure there has to be something similar for Linux.

      man nm

      # nm /lib/libz.so
      0000cb88 A _DYNAMIC
      0000cc44 A _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
      [...]
      00005f64 T zcalloc
      00005f88 T zcfree
      00005f28 T zlibVersion
      #

    8. Re:Great, but needs guidelines. by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been thinking for a while now that what we need is a comic book style layout. As applications open windows, a new panel opens up, shrinking all the other windows so that every non-minimized window gets screen space with no overlapping. For example: One window would take the whole screen; two would split the screen and be side by side; three would be done as one on the left half, two splitting the right half, one on top, one below; etc. The panels would be resizeable and it should be easy to re-sequence the display.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:Great, but needs guidelines. by ForumTroll · · Score: 3, Informative

      You've just described tiling window managers. You might want to look at Xmonad, Awesome, DWM, StumpWM or WMII. I personally use Xmonad and definitely wouldn't go back to a traditional window manager.

      --
      "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
  2. A killer feature? by digitalderbs · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a very good idea. I could see this being one of those new killer features to brings linux to more desktops. Integrating this into a package manager could really help new users see the (perceived) quality of some of the software projects available to them -- most people only see GUIs. Integrate a user comment/review section for individual programs, and it becomes even more accessible.

    I'm aware that this is already contained in a site like freshmeat, but the point would be to make a unified experience to the new/old user. Throw in bug submission, and it's even more useful. A single program to browse, view screenshots, review/comment and submit bugs for programs. You could even throw in a paypal donation, which either gets disbursed to everybody or specific projects. There's a lot that could be done, and this is one area that OSS really shines.

  3. still waiting for the yes(1) screenshot ;( by StandardDeviant · · Score: 5, Funny

    y
    y
    y
    y
    y
    y
    y
    y
    y
    y

    :)

    1. Re:still waiting for the yes(1) screenshot ;( by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, you just didn't let it run all the way through.

  4. How do I like look? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Debian users can finally get an impression of how an application would like look before installing it.

    But what if I want to know what an application would look like, not how it will like look, after it will have been installed?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  5. Screenshots by KasperMeerts · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great idea, absolutely but is it really necessary? When I want to try out a package, I immediately just type the name into Google Images and get a good impression that way.
    But it's of course great for Linux-newbs to see it. It's probably more eyecandy than useful.

    --
    As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
  6. Re:A picture is NOT worth a thousand words... by taupin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Forgot about that checkbox, eh?

  7. Re:A picture is NOT worth a thousand words... by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry, you have forever been marked as a troll.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...