Slashdot Mirror


Obese Have Right To Two Airline Seats

The Supreme Court of Canada decided to not hear an appeal from Canadian airlines on Thursday, effectively ruling obese people have the right to two seats for the price of one. The Canadian Transportation Agency had made a decision earlier that people who are "functionally disabled by obesity" deserve to have two seats for one fare. The appeal had been launched by Air Canada, Air Canada Jazz and WestJet. Now they just have to work on more leg room for tall, fat people and complimentary pie.

74 comments

  1. Economy class arm-rests by ettlz · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, on some flights these don't flip up. So if you get on a aeroplane, and the arm-rest is a bit warm and musty...

    1. Re:Economy class arm-rests by Nabeel_co · · Score: 1

      Actually, almost all of them do, you need to press a button at the bottom back near the hinge to raise it. Its also a great way to lie down and sleep if the seats next to you aren't taken! It's like 1st class in coach.

    2. Re:Economy class arm-rests by ettlz · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip... I'll try that next time.

    3. Re:Economy class arm-rests by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Not the ones in bulkhead rows because those contain the tables since there is no row in front.

    4. Re:Economy class arm-rests by Intron · · Score: 2, Funny

      For those ones you need a screwdriver.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  2. Fuck that by TheLostSamurai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, I never thought I would comment on an idle story but this just pisses me off. I'm 6'5", does this mean that I'm entitled to always sit in the emergency exit row where there is more leg room, or 2 seats so I can stretch out? Does this mean I'm functionally disabled by my height? Not only that, I was born with this 'affliction', and as much as people may say the are pre-disposed to obesity, If you ass is too big to fit in a single seat it is your own damned fault. I would guarantee my metabolism is slower than most (I can easily put on 10lbs of real weight in a week), which is why I eat healthy and exercise 3-4 times a week.

    Don't give me this functionally disabled by obesity bullshit. Put down the god damned jelly doughnut and the cheetos and go for a walk for fucks sake.

    /flame

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    1. Re:Fuck that by Nabeel_co · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, in the interest of fairness, some people actually can't do anything about their weight... but the other 95% can...

    2. Re:Fuck that by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have yet to see someone who can't do anything about their weight.
      I see people who eat 5 meals a day complain how hard it is.
      Or 3 meals, but require 3 full plate-loads in a meal

      But ANYONE 'CAN' get surgery/liposuction. So.. I disagree about being "helpless", and I agree with the GP. They get an extra luxury because of a "disability". How many other people do you see get an extra seat for claustrophobia? Zip, zilch, nada.

      Defining obesity as a disability nowadays is really sickening. Seeing people not having to work, or park far away because the threshold for "disability" being lowered is just sad. Soon they will have a disability that allows you to not work, just because you are too tired. Oh wait, they already have that!

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    3. Re:Fuck that by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where were the 5% of obese people 10years ago? Obesity figures have doubled in the last 20years in the US. Japan has 10% the obesity figures that the US has. I'm sure 100years ago in countries like japan/korea obesity figures were well under .5% (though no studies were done at the time obviously). America is fat because they eat garbage and don't exercise same as in any other country. This ruling is total BS.

    4. Re:Fuck that by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm the same height and completely agree with you. We should be always entitled to sit in the emergency exit row!

    5. Re:Fuck that by snaz555 · · Score: 1

      100% have the physical ability to consume their fat. Calories out minus calories in - the balance will come from somewhere. Claiming anything else is to claim that the human body is a perpetual motion machine. What they can't is seem to accomplish is to develop an objective sense of what they need; I know one fat person who tells me he needs some ridiculous amount of protein every day or he's going to wither away. He thinks he needs 3000 kcal per day or he's going to starve - then tells me he's fat because of his genes. Last I checked there was no 'clue' gene.

    6. Re:Fuck that by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      No, not the exit row. First class. Exit row requires the person is capable of acting effectively in an emergency. Tall people have longer extremities which can be ineffective in the constrained spaces between rows.

      Besides, the seats in first class are far more comfortable. And with our long legs we can reach the exit door in first class faster with fewer people to compete for the exit.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    7. Re:Fuck that by ockegheim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't imagine all that high-fructose corn syrup is helping either.

      Though we eat cane sugar in Australia and have an 'obesity epidemic' all our own.

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
    8. Re:Fuck that by Nemyst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I also am 6'5'' and quite wide of shoulders and I have to say this news completely revolts me. I'm sickened not to have heard about it while it was still in process (this shows how nice news channels are...) and I believe if obese people are now considered as "disabled", then tall people should also have some compensation!

      What's the thing with those people? "Oh, my fat is dangling off my pants, I'm too tired to exercise and I can't pay for a liposuction!" Pew, pew. Sad thing. THEY have all the possibilities to change. Tall people can't. We're the way we are and no, I'm not sawing myself in half just to remove some height!

      So, what now? Will we have to bitch and fight to actually get some sort of relatively similar treatment? I doubt they'll move on their own. First class, definitely. I also happen to be struck with apraxia, a rare nervous disease which basically makes me useless in those emergency seats, so I'm struck with either being lucky and the carrier accepting to take me or being even more lucky and get a seat in front of the TV. Why can't I be considered "disabled" and be given something suitable to my "condition"?

      This is really proving how retarded the whole system is.

    9. Re:Fuck that by phorm · · Score: 1

      What does "functionally disabled" mean? If it means an actual medical condition, then GREAT, because in that case all you should need is a doctor's note indicating that your morbid obesity is due to a medical condition. For those that are just fat lazy SOB's who can't bother to exercise or eat healthy, lose some pounds or pay the piper.

      The only *good* I can see from this is that if they're divvying out two actual seats to some 300lb tub-of-lard, it's saving some poor smuck from being saddled with the seat beside him/her and being half sat-upon the whole journey.

    10. Re:Fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are several problems with the hate spewing from your mouth.

      1) Have some perspective. It's as much about a obese person as it is about the person sitting next to him. Buying a second seat is courtesy (in many cases) not an obligation!
      2) Airlines charge twice as much for a second seat, when in fact, they are not providing twice the service. They don't provide a second meal, extra luggage, double miles(in some cases), etc. I'd say that's a small savings BUT they could also optimize and save more money--2 fat persons can sit side by side in a 3-seat row. Should they pay twice as much in that case? I would argue no! Airlines are not responsive to the needs of the consumer as you have found in your case with height. I have found that some airlines are somewhat responsive when directly discuss your needs with them. (Have you even called the airline to see if they would accommodate that request?) However the fact that airlines are not responsive, and have been forced to change their ways is not a reason to hate on somebody. Fight your fight for better leg room.
      3) Extending on the previous argument: On an empty flight the airlines DO NOT refund the cost of an extra ticket despite the fact it was unnecessary.
      4) Is this all you've got to complain about? Live and let live... it doesn't affect you, and if it does, it means the person next to you isn't invading your personal space. Be happy about that, and bitch about more important things.

      I personally didn't have problems paying for the second ticket however I have always been disappointed by the airlines. It was something I did for my comfort and the comfort of passengers next to me. You never know, the tall person might be next...

      And BTW, there's no free ride when being fat. People think it's different than smoking or other socially unacceptable behaviours, but people are just as mean spirited and hateful.

    11. Re:Fuck that by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "You know, I never thought I would comment on an idle story but this just pisses me off. I'm 6'5", does this mean that I'm entitled to always sit in the emergency exit row where there is more leg room, or 2 seats so I can stretch out?"

      No, but feel free to wish your were obese and short if that seems more fair to you.

    12. Re:Fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse is seeing them get given a motorised scooter at taxpayers' (or insurance policy holders' in the US) expense so they don't have to get off their ass and burn some calories when they want to go to the mall.

    13. Re:Fuck that by Gropo · · Score: 1

      I'm 6'2" with a 36" inseam; cyclist who gets inanely violent leg cramps in constricted seating positions. And I'd probably get the shaft for being under the clause height.

      Makes me want to bathe with human liposuction soap.

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    14. Re:Fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where was this ruling again?
      You seem to be confused.

    15. Re:Fuck that by chrb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It depends what you mean by "can't". If they were incarcerated in some prison in one of the less nice parts of the world, they would lose weight - I don't recall seeing any obese people leaving the Nazi concentration camps. So clearly it is physically possible for them to lose weight. You can argue over whether they are mentally capable of changing their own lifestyles, or even whether they have an "addiction" to food, but the reality is that fat deposits are just a function of energy_in and energy_out.

    16. Re:Fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the healthy were not murdered and processed on arrival to the German death camps. Fat people were quickly made into soap.

    17. Re:Fuck that by knapper_tech · · Score: 1

      Yeah.....I was born with a genetic disorder where my fat cells will starve the rest of my body of nutrients to preserve themselves.

      I ate rice and a few eggs and peanuts for one month when I was completely totally flat broke. I always breakdance. My weight never seemed to fluctuate before, but I also used to have a chin. I flattened out somewhere around "lean" and have become slightly more typical for me since getting back to the states. It seems like weight isn't all that influenced by diet to a point, but the when the laws of thermodynamics take over, body fat loses.^_^

      --
      "There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell them." ~ Louis Armstrong
  3. What a load of crap by SpuriousLogic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sorry, but lifting a 400 pound fatass into the sky takes twice as much fuel as lifting a 200 pound fatass into the sky. Just like freight shipping is based on weight. That 400 pound tub of lard is not only getting their healthcare subsidized by people who are healthy, but they are also getting their airfare subsidized. Maybe they should just be banned from airlines altogether - they could use the exercise walking to their destination.

    1. Re:What a load of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PPP (Pay Per Pound) Total weight...you and your luggage.

    2. Re:What a load of crap by sexybomber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You see, all of that makes perfect sense, which is why it will never be implemented.

    3. Re:What a load of crap by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Possibly might work.... for half the population.

      Men could be enticed to get on a scale on pay based on how much they weigh.

      Women would NEVER get on the scale. EVER. Not a single one, regardless of what they looked like.

    4. Re:What a load of crap by Zymergy · · Score: 1

      Just charge them the extra rates for extra luggage up to the amount of weight in excess of the average weight for a man/woman.
      Every piece of luggage has a weight limit and this rate can be applied to the larger person and any excess can be considered as additional bags.
      Perhaps anorexic passengers can sell their underused wright limit pounds as 'roll-over' pounds creating a new market or in case they have pound overages the next time they fly...
      Frequent-flier pounds?

      Would this now mean that conjoined-twins must pay for two tickets also or only one ticket, but subject only to the conditions that they are obese and flying in Canada?

  4. A Thought by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Defining obesity as a disability nowadays is really sickening.

    I understand the sentiment and to large extend agree with it but then a thought crossed my mind. Supposing someone maimed themselves i.e. cut off a limb deliberately. Wouldn't we regard them as disabled even though the wound was self-inflicted? Arguably this might be because they are clearly mentally disturbed...but couldn't the same be said of someone who is so obese they cannot function properly (I mean we are not talking slightly overweight here).

    1. Re:A Thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you cut off your own arm claiming to be disabled then I say deal with it and go take a hike.

    2. Re:A Thought by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's all very well, but what if they cut off a leg?

    3. Re:A Thought by Chrisje · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you cut off your arm you'd be slimmer, so they could put the obese passenger next to your self-maiming ass.

    4. Re:A Thought by JoeFromPhilly · · Score: 1

      Well, in that case a hike is probably out of the picture.

  5. So who pays by Krakadoom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So not only will be have to deal with the 'spill over' into our seat space from our obese friends - we also effectively have to pay extra because they're on the flight? There's only one place the airline will recoup the loss of the extra seat, and that's on everyones fare price. I wonder if this will hit american airlines harder than others *giggle* One might even say it's a heavy burden...

  6. American Airlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Speaking as a large man, I say fuck you all, seriously, fuck you. I consume no more calories per day than many of you do (under 2k on most days), but I do not loose weight.

    That having been said. I have very little problem with the way Southwest Airlines does this, and has been doing it for quite a while. If I book a flight, I tell them I need 2 seats due to size. If I neglect to tell them, someone at the terminal will pull me aside and discreetly "remind" me that I need to buy a second seat if I have not already done so. Once I do this, its all cool. I even get priority boarding so that I can make sure that I can get 2 seats together (a second seat would not help if one is up front, the other in back). When the plane takes off, if there are no empty seats, I pay for both of the seats I used. If there is even one empty seat on the plane, then the plane is not booked, and the airline views it as I was just using what would have been an empty seat, and they refund the cost of the second seat. (I have to contact them and they send a refund that takes 2-3 weeks, but I get a refund.) If there are empty seats on a plane and the tall guys wants to stretch out a bit, I have no problem with that. If the big guy wants to spread out a bit, no one should have any trouble with that either, so if there are any empty seats, they treat it that way. I have been on flights where I have paid for my second seat, and I have been on flights when I got a refund. They take the money for the second seat even if they know the flight is underbooked. I usually try to book flights off hours just so that I can be pretty sure that there will be empty seats.

    1. Re:American Airlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds liek the issue may be that you arent expending more calories than you are taking in. I would say it would be almost impossible to burn more calories than you are taking in and maintain your weight without some rare medical issue. How much exercise do you do?

    2. Re:American Airlines by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I would say it would be almost impossible to burn more calories than you are taking in and maintain your weight without some rare medical issue
      ITYM "without violating the second law of thermodynamics".

      Also, for GPs sake, you probably can't expect to lose weight (or loose weight as he put it) eating 2000 calories a day. Some people can't even lose weight eating only 1500.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    3. Re:American Airlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The blanket statements made here simply show a great degree of ignorance and intolerance and this from a group of people who are supposedly above average in the intelligence sector and are not particularly known for being among the best physical specimens. There is an assumption that all fat people are fat because they eat too much and are lazy. Its no truer than making a blanket statement about all geeks, and we all know that many of us do not fit the stereotype (I am married, have kids and could live without Star Wars/Star Trek/Lord of the Rings quite happily) , though they still persist

      In all fairness, the original poster said

      There is no violation of the law of thermodynamics here. (though you seem to be a good exhibit of the law of conservation of misinformed stereotypes) Believe it or not, a 500 lb man burns more calories sitting around all day watching television that an average, fairly active 200 lb man does in a day. (look up BMR if you don't believe me) a 200 lbs man who eats 2000 calories in a day is likely to feel stuffed, while a 500lb man who eats the same will not, but believe it or not, if they both sit around all day doing nothing, the fat man will burn more of those calories. It just takes that much more energy to keep a fatter body alive. If the original poster is 400 or 500 lbs and eats 2000 colories, that is actually about the same as a 200 lb man eating 1300-1500 calories. I would say from the original post that either a.) he actually consumes more than he thinks (possible) or b.) There is a metabolic problem that is causing him not to burn calories at even the normal Basal Metabolic Rate. If he cat categorically state that he eats

      There are people who do honestly not possess the ability to recognize when they have had enough and there is documented medical evidence of food addiction. Food addiction would be tough. Imagine having an addiction to a substance that you have to have a certain amount of every day just to live. Think of the alcoholic who has to have 32 drinks per day to stay alive. What chance to they have of kicking their habit. What about the heroine or meth addict? That is an even rarer case, but it happens.

    4. Re:American Airlines by islandstifle · · Score: 1

      Nope, this is not unfair nor intolerance. If the plane carries more weight, it has to burn more fuel. While airlines can't (for the moment) weigh passengers checking in, if a person needs two seats to travel then it is a pretty safe bet that they are making a bit more than the average contribution to the plane's weight, and they should pay accordingly.

    5. Re:American Airlines by Toe,+The · · Score: 1

      Having a large ass is not necessary an indicator of weight. For example, I know a couple women who could easily overflow two airline seats; yet they are quite short and I would guess they weigh well under 200 pounds. Conversely, I know guys who can easily fit in an airline seat with room to spare, yet who weigh at least 200 pounds.

      Or to put it another way:
      1. Some people have a large ass out of all proportion to their body.
      2. By volume, muscle weighs a lot more than fat.

  7. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not that you're disabled, it's that things weren't built with you in mind, so now what they are saying is an accommodation has to be made by default.

  8. Re:Shocking Intolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shutup, fatass.

  9. Re:Shocking Intolerance by Chrisje · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having said that, obesity is being treated way too nicely indeed. It's some people's problem alright, but the second law of thermodynamics is the second law of thermodynamics.

    If we keep tip-toeing around the question, and we're gonna be all politically correct about it, we're never gonna get anywhere.

    Why is it that a homosexual who attracts the AIDS virus can get condemned in many countries, but a fat man / woman can't be chastised for not taking care of themselves?

    Why can a smoker be told to quit smoking or else, while fat people get treated with velvet gloves, as we say?

    Having said all that: Obesity, in some cases cannot be helped. But in other cases it can be. I would argue that the great majority of obese people I've known simply lacked the knowledge or self-discipline to do something about it.

    If I see the mother of a fat kid in the UK looking at a leaf of Basil and exclaiming "But who on earth could eat that? It's GREEN!", you have the cause for the kid's obesity nailed down right there.

    Eat in moderate amounts. Fresh stuff. Mostly plants. Move your ass regularly.

    There.

    And no, I don't particularly feel like paying through the nose for other people's problems either. Just like my mother raised me not to become a burden to others.

  10. Re:Shocking Intolerance by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

    It's not intolerance. It may be hard for someone to hear and it may not be sensitive but it costs more to ship your ass around the world if you are heavier and consume more space. That is why it costs more to Fedex a 500lb shipment than a 20 lb package. The only difference is that reminding someone that they are larger hurts peoples feelings and their wallets.

  11. agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    agreed

  12. Re:Shocking Intolerance by allacds · · Score: 1

    Eat in moderate amounts. Fresh stuff. Mostly plants. Move your ass regularly.

    Michael is that you??

    I didn't know Michael Pollan was a /.er ...

  13. Re:Fuck that - What a lot of rubbish. by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    You really dont have much of a clue do you?

    The cost of flying people around is almost exactly proportional to the weight carried, with a slight modifier of the number of people you get the the aircraft.

    I would propose the simple solution in this case is to set an average person weight, and charge people the same for extra weight regardless of it being baggage or their own body.

    I weight very light (60kg, over 6 foot..) as a man, due to a non-eating-related medical condition, which I have no choice over. Why should I be subsidising the costs of people larger than me? BTW I will also die approximately 15-20 year early from the same condition. I got my arse kicked when young for being 'scrawny', so dont try and pull the 'life is hard being large' card on me.

    What is next? large people have the right to an extra course in restaurants for free because they 'need' it?

    Oh, and as to your item 4, who the hell do you think ends up paying for these extra seats? the tooth fairy?

    Also, I am sure there are exceptions, but every airline I deal with DOES give extra luggage if you busy an extra seat. I often have to carry delicate equipment around the world, and quite often book a second seat for that equipment (as it cannot be roughly handled). I explain everything to the airlist before booking and it is NEVER a problem, that ticket comes
    with a full allocation of luggage allowance, etc even though there is no associated person.

    Stop wanting special treatment, grow up, and deal with your situation instead of expecting others to deal with it.

  14. Re:Shocking Intolerance - Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe some of you. I have a non-functioning thyroid. I eat 1000 calories a day and walk 2 miles each day, yet I'm ~200lbs. There is absolutely nothing I can do about it, and yes I'm on a LOT of drugs for that and other health conditions. I couldn't help it that my thyroid cut out at 14 years old.

  15. The Frantics Definition of the word FAT! by killmofasta · · Score: 1

    Dont say the word 'FAT!'
    Just the thought of all you hippos crawling out of your polyester tarpolins is enough to make my oatmean hit the wall. <Beginning of rant> They need to make the doors on airplanes much smaller so that FAT people have to ride in the cargo bin, or better yet, load them in with the sissors jack they use for the food, and shove them in their own creche...right next to the food, so they dont have to get up to eat, or go to the bathroom. How do FAT people go to the can on a airplane, Im skinny, and I barely fit. If you need to take up two seats, you sould pay for two seats and the ARM REST. <end of rant>

    Hey: "If there is even one empty seat on the plane, then the plane is not booked, and the airline views it as I was just using what would have been an empty seat, and they refund the cost of the second seat." Good idea, or rather GREAT IDEA! Mod +1 interesting!

  16. Re:Shocking Intolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Methinks you're thinking of the first law of thermodynamics. Don't really see any connection to entropy here.

  17. Re:Shocking Intolerance by lena_10326 · · Score: 1
    1. You're post was not troll. It was lively, but not trollish.
    2. I think you are entirely missing the point of many of the irate postings here. They're irate because it's yet another example of personal irresponsibility triumphing over self-sacrifice. Yet again society has to pick up the slack for the laziness of others. I'll tell you this: many people are growing sick of it. Very sick of it, and I don't blame them.
    3. Obesity is a behavioral problem for 99%-ish of all obese people. It's not a viral disease. It's a 100% behavioral problem, which means it can be controlled. Most of us control our diet and thus our weight. Some of us may be a little fat, but it's not out-of-hand. We can still easily fit inside an airline seat. The REAL selfish people you speak of are these people who cannot or will not control their diets. They consume every edible thing in sight. They crave instant and continuous satisfaction. THEY are the selfish ones. NOT US.
    --
    Camping on quad since 1996.
  18. Re:Shocking Intolerance - Answer by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

    I can't believe some of you. I have a non-functioning thyroid. I eat 1000 calories a day and walk 2 miles each day, yet I'm ~200lbs. There is absolutely nothing I can do about it, and yes I'm on a LOT of drugs for that and other health conditions. I couldn't help it that my thyroid cut out at 14 years old.

    I believe you would fit into the 5% combined with the 95% to create the 100%. The outrage is directed at the 95% that does not include you. There is a basic reason for the outrage. Most of us are to a greater or lesser extent technically minded. Each of us recognizes a fundamental truth. That truth being that if there is an imbalance between fuel input and fuel expenditure then there will be a deficit or a surplus of fuel. Surplus fuel in the human body translates directly into surplus storage of that fuel in the form of fat.

    Most people (even skinny people) have not a clue what their true caloric intake is. If asked almost without exception you will either receive a very low ball answer or an outright "I don't know." To further complicate things most people have not a clue how food works in the human body. Almost without exclusion people believe that if you are "hungry" you need food which of course cannot be further from the truth. People that consistently eat meals large enough cause a feeling of fullness end up stretching out their stomachs thus requiring yet more food to fill it up. Also, many assume that it the whole process can be summed up into a neat and tidy total calories for the day type deal rather than the slightly more complex reality. In reality, as caloric energy is made available for use in the body a decision is made. If there's no present need for that energy, the body elects to store it as fat. People that consume highly digestible foods (read low fiber/protein, reduced sugar, etc.) flood their body with large amounts of energy spread over very short time periods well in excess of what they require. As an added side effect since the food is highly digestible there stomach voids itself faster presenting them with a perceived need for additional food. Rinse, repeat...

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  19. I'm curious.. who will get bumped? by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

    Airlines book to maximum capacity. Sometimes, they even overbook slightly because a statistically small number of travelers do not show up. This normally works well, but occasionally 1 or 2 passengers get bumped to another flight. The bumped passengers are generally the ones with the cheapest economy ticket with direct domestic flights with no connections. Alternative flights may also play into this (but I'm not sure). Anyhow, the airline will not know which passenger is morbidly obese enough to require 2 seats, so the airline will still sell to full capacity. Now, my question is... who gets bumped? The obese passenger (who will likely decry discrimination) or the hapless passenger who happened to be given the adjacent seat? What if that passenger paid full rate? What if that passenger has 1 bazillion flier miles? What if that passenger has an international connection? OK, so now we have to shuffle around passengers AFTER check-in seat assignments have been made in order to bump an economy class domestic passenger. Wonderful. More delays.

    I see this really increasing the number of bumped passengers because as the word gets out that obese passengers get 2 seats, they will fly more. Also, borderline obese passengers will begin demanding their right to a free 2nd seat. Airlines will likely yield and give them that seat, fearing bad press if they don't.. thus bumping more passengers. This is going to gum up even more an already bad flying experience.

    --
    Camping on quad since 1996.
  20. Get a clue you ignorant git! by Enter+the+Shoggoth · · Score: 1

    The so called "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" that you refer to is a set of symptoms associated with known causes, that being most commonly Myoencephalitis and is often accompanied with extreme pain (Fibromyalgia).

    Most suffers have become afflicted by as a result of depressed immune system due to overwork.

    Put another way, most sufferers get that way due to being workaholics.

    It happened to a close friend of mine, and it nearly killed him, he was bed ridden for nearly a whole year. The guy is anything but lazy, runs his own IT consulting business full time, contributes to a number of open source projects, and is studying for his doctorate part-time, he also manages to squeeze in being a father somehow.

    I have yet to see someone who can't do anything about their weight. I see people who eat 5 meals a day complain how hard it is. Or 3 meals, but require 3 full plate-loads in a meal But ANYONE 'CAN' get surgery/liposuction. So.. I disagree about being "helpless", and I agree with the GP. They get an extra luxury because of a "disability". How many other people do you see get an extra seat for claustrophobia? Zip, zilch, nada. Defining obesity as a disability nowadays is really sickening. Seeing people not having to work, or park far away because the threshold for "disability" being lowered is just sad. Soon they will have a disability that allows you to not work, just because you are too tired. Oh wait, they already have that!

    --
    Andy Warhol got it right / Everybody gets the limelight
    Andy Warhol got it wrong / Fifteen minutes is too long.
    1. Re:Get a clue you ignorant git! by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Get a clue you ignorant git!
      Most suffers have become
      Put another way, most sufferers
      It happened to a close friend of mine

      I actually have a family member who "has" it (although I love them, I hate the fact they take advantage of something like this, and try telling me to get a job/work - which I did get), and I am still biased towards it. They won't talk about it, unless its used as an excuse NOT to do something. It's is hard to diagnose (taken from the link) meaning it can be abused.

      Regardless of "most", or your relations with someone who has it, it is still being abused like the occasional obese person who abuses their 'disability'. Most people like to pretend their lives are "worse" than anyone elses. Sometimes they wish to go as far as a 'legal' way of defining how bad it is, so they can get sympathy and excuses.

      Notice, how most people who are actually disabled: DON'T want sympathy? I have seen disabled people who could legally not have to get a job, but still go to work because they want to be normal (and respected, which they are).

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    2. Re:Get a clue you ignorant git! by Enter+the+Shoggoth · · Score: 1

      I think most people know someone who abuses "the system" whatever that may be (social security, stock market, taxation, etc, etc).

      Any system created by mankind will be abused by some members of society, but only the fundamentalist libertarians (ie the no government at all crowd) would argue that the system in question should be dismantled completely.

      Sure it's frustrating when you know someone personally who does it, but that does _not_ mean that everyone else is also on the take.

      Hell, you've only got to look at the number of people on slashdot who've self diagnosed themselves as as aspergers sufferers, I am sure that a number of them actually are high-functioning autists. But 10 years these self same people would have been told that they are _just_ being antisocial. Wind the clock back a few decades and the same was said of people with any form of mental disease. And of course today there is a widespread problem with chronic depression which of course is spurned my many as laziness.

      Just because something is hard to diagnose doesn't make it fictitious.

      Get a clue you ignorant git! Most suffers have become Put another way, most sufferers It happened to a close friend of mine

      I actually have a family member who "has" it (although I love them, I hate the fact they take advantage of something like this, and try telling me to get a job/work - which I did get), and I am still biased towards it. They won't talk about it, unless its used as an excuse NOT to do something. It's is hard to diagnose (taken from the link) meaning it can be abused. Regardless of "most", or your relations with someone who has it, it is still being abused like the occasional obese person who abuses their 'disability'. Most people like to pretend their lives are "worse" than anyone elses. Sometimes they wish to go as far as a 'legal' way of defining how bad it is, so they can get sympathy and excuses. Notice, how most people who are actually disabled: DON'T want sympathy? I have seen disabled people who could legally not have to get a job, but still go to work because they want to be normal (and respected, which they are).

      --
      Andy Warhol got it right / Everybody gets the limelight
      Andy Warhol got it wrong / Fifteen minutes is too long.
  21. when i thought i couldn't hate fat people anymore by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    ... this shit happens. i'm not the slimest guy in the world but i certainly fit in a normal airline seat, and fuck me if the day came that i couldn't i'd be getting OFF that plane and getting on a tread mill ASAP, not filing a lawsuit.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  22. Truth is by noundi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well it's not a surprise that people react to this. Simple maths will tell you that because of people being obese, YOU have to pay for that extra seat with higher ticket prices. Airline business is very competative and as a side note, to those of you complaining for more space, you fly cheap, you sit cheap, simple as that. Now to my point. Truth is: given that obesity is now considered a handicap it is however not irreversable. Thus through whatever actions (walking, running, operation, what the fuck ever) there are solutions for reversing the damage. If your legs are fucked, I will step aside when you roll by to give you space, this is common sense (given that I may at any point loose the function of my legs as well). But if you're just plain fat and haven't solved this clearly irreversable issue as stated above, YOU will step aside for I will never be in that situation. It's an insurance. Everyone has a chance of loosing their legs in an accident, however not all of us are lazy, and yes, some of us have better metabolism but it DOES NOT give you the right to be passive and then claim that everybody else should adapt. Nobody wants to be fat, this is given, and of course I feel sorry for those that are in extreme situations as illustrated above. However it's a matter of giving up. If you give up on yourself, don't expect anyone to do anything different.

    Human nature: don't spend energy unless necessary. Paradox: unless necessary, you will stay fat and miserable. Period.

    --
    I am the lawn!
    1. Re:Truth is by noundi · · Score: 1

      ...solved this clearly irreversable issue...

      I mean reversable of course. My bad.

      --
      I am the lawn!
  23. Re:Shocking Intolerance - Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bullshit,
    low thyroid is treated easily with one pill a day,
    like millions of hypothyroid people.

  24. Re:when i thought i couldn't hate fat people anymo by JoeFromPhilly · · Score: 1

    I agree. Although, I think they should have to get two seats; I just think they should have to pay for them both. It really sucks being stuck next to some fat guy whose thick layer of blubber can't be contained by his armrest and it starts pouring into your lap. And then you get to listen to them struggle to breath for two hours. And why are fat people so sweaty even when they're sitting down?

  25. Two Words by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    Rail Freight

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  26. I have a clue you ignorant git! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have what has been called chronic fatigue and I work 40 hours a week, barely. Weekends, off time, and vacations are all spent in bed. I am literaly killing myself to feed my family. My kids only see me in bed or know I am away working. I was once a fire lieutendant and paramedic on the upward career track, not anymore. I only keep my research job now because I have an understanding boss.

    1. Re:I have a clue you ignorant git! by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      Weekends, off time, and vacations are all spent in bed.

      I spend my weekends/off time/vacations in bed too.. 12 hours a day, I have 12 more hours to do whatever I want. I know how to state partial truths as much as you (my family member tried this lie just like you). You don't sleep 6+24+24=56 hours straight every week.

      My kids only see me in bed or know I am away working

      Really?! You and I both know that, you sir, are in fact a big liar. If the above response wasn't proof enough, then WHY are you POSTING on slashdot? You have NO sympathy from me. You can try and lie to yourself all you like, but when you learn to face life, it will be much more enjoyable and you may actually EARN people's respect.

      I have a clue you ignorant git!

      If the only response you have is insults and lies. Then I believe you have overstayed your welcome.

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
  27. Re:Shocking Intolerance by Jekler · · Score: 1

    Over-eating is a behavior problem, but I don't believe it is selfish because it is not motivated by self-interest. It's an out of control biological urge, but the behavior is not beneficial to the self.

    Over-eating isn't the only behavioral problem. There are millions of behavioral problems that all cost us money in one way or another, and it's selfish for each of us to go through the list and make a case for why the other behavioral problems should be charged extra for it. We could run through the entire APA Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and assess a societal cost for each condition. Obviously people who have conditions that are undiagnosed and thus untreated should be charged because their untreated behavioral issues are costing society.

    When it comes to airfare, you're not just paying for an obese person's extra room, you're paying the customer service cost of the people who can't be satisfied and need $1000 worth of customer support for a $200 seat. Quiet, well-mannered people are still paying for the flight attendants even when we don't require their services. Orderly people still have to pay for the time and congestion caused by people who never have their their ID, wallet, credit card, and checkbook ready even though they're standing in a line and they know they're about to be asked for these things. We have to pay for the security cost of people who couldn't be bothered to read the regulations about what they're allowed to travel with.

    Alternatively, we could just agree that we all have problems, and we're not going to play a game where we start assessing the costs of each individual.

  28. Re:Shocking Intolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like the rantings of a Communist. Are you a Communist, sir?

  29. Re:A BETTER Thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget arms and legs, the g-g-g-p could just cut off his head (in case he's wondering, it's that big, empty, pumpkin-shaped thing where that foul mouth is) and we'd ALL get to stop worrying about how tall he is.

  30. Re:when i thought i couldn't hate fat people anymo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can hate whoever you want, but Jesus loves you.

  31. Re:Shocking Intolerance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it that a homosexual who attracts the AIDS virus can get condemned in many countries, but a fat man / woman can't be chastised for not taking care of themselves?

    Um, because queers and smokers CHOOSE to be so and (regardless how much your local swisher would argue otherwise) smoking (tobacco or bones) is NOT a biological necessity such as is eating.

    There.

  32. Two donuts for the price of one- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What else can fat people get away with? (yeah, fat, not obese, as that implies an actual affliction such as the mythical thyroid disorder)

    "Hi I'm so fat my ass won't fit in 1 seat so kindly give me a 2nd seat at no extra cost to me."

    will spiral into:

    "Hi I'm so fat my stomach is 5x larger than the average person my height/age so kindly give me 5x the amount of food at no extra cost to me."

    My dad told me that fat people could lose weight by repeating 1 exercise at every meal: place arms down at sides, raise hands to chest level with palms facing out, extend arms.

  33. functional disability by Jodka · · Score: 1

    people who are "functionally disabled by obesity" deserve to have two seats for one fare.

    Do people who are functionally disabled by alcoholism deserve two drinks for the price of one?

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    1. Re:functional disability by shivamib · · Score: 0

      Do people who are functionally disabled by alcoholism deserve two drinks for the price of one?

      Only if you are obese.