Slashdot Mirror


RICO Class Action Against RIAA In Missouri

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In Atlantic Recording v. Raleigh, an RIAA case pending in St. Louis, Missouri, the defendant has asserted detailed counterclaims against the RIAA for federal RICO violations, fraud, violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, prima facie tort, trespass, and conspiracy. The claims focus on the RIAA's 'driftnet' tactic of suing innocent people, and of demanding extortionate settlements. The RICO 'predicate acts' alleged in the 42-page pleading (PDF) are extortion, mail fraud, and wire fraud. The proposed class includes all people residing in the US 'who were falsely accused ... of downloading copyrighted sound recordings owned by the counterclaim Defendants and making them available for distribution or mass distribution over a P2P network and who incurred costs and damages including legal fees in defense of such false claims' or 'whose computers used in interstate commerce and/or communication were accessed ... without permission or authority.' This is the second class action of which we are aware against the RIAA and the Big 4 recording companies, the first being the Oregon class action brought by Tanya Andersen, which is presently in the discovery phase."

13 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. I'm a huge pirate... by jornak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here RIAA RIAA RIAA. Come and get me and my 200+ gigabytes of stolen music.

    1. Re:I'm a huge pirate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      you need to click the little box to post anonymously...

    2. Re:I'm a huge pirate... by philspear · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you live in St. Louis? I'm not with the RIAA*, I am a fellow youngster living in St. Louis who would like to recieve some illegal stolen music from today's popular artists, then maybe go and drink an alchoholic beverage with you. I have videogames that we can play as well. We can "hang out." I want to emphasize that I am not with the RIAA*.

      (* RIAA here does not refer to Recording Industry Association of America)

    3. Re:I'm a huge pirate... by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now the RIAA can feel how it's like to be hunted by an ambiguous four-letter abbreviation which can't be reasoned with.

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    4. Re:I'm a huge pirate... by dontmakemethink · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you live in St. Louis? I'm not with the RIAA*, I am a fellow youngster living in St. Louis who would like to recieve some illegal stolen music from today's popular artists, then maybe go and drink an alchoholic beverage with you. I have videogames that we can play as well. We can "hang out." I want to emphasize that I am not with the RIAA*.

      (* RIAA here does not refer to Recording Industry Association of America)

      I'm in St. Louis, and would love to meet. There's a nice dark alley on Pine between N 11th and N 12th, we could meet there. I assure you that I do not have a gun*.

      (* the word 'gun' does not refer to any type of firearm)

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    5. Re:I'm a huge pirate... by jebrew · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, I've been getting a lot of flack since I changed mine to DE.AD.C0.ED

  2. Re:"falsely accused"? by Ngarrang · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the USA, we are supposedly innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Thus, you can claim you are falsely accused up to the point where a judge banks the gavel and declares you guilty.

    At least, that is what my elementary school teacher taught me back in the 70's.

    --
    Bearded Dragon
  3. Re:Real life imitating slashdot.org by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder how many times has this been pointed out that someone should roll up a RICO class action suit against RIAA?

    The RIAA getting RICO-rolled... there's a youtube viral in there somewhere, I can sense it.

  4. Re:Dear Lord.... Use a Line Return or 84.... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Funny

    :% s/\([A-Z]\{3,}\)/\r\1/g

    Dear Lord . . . I actually understand that. I need to get out more. :)

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  5. Re:"falsely accused"? by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Funny

    I used FDR of raping me years after he died, and won.

    FDR raped you years after he'd died...?!

    OMG ZOMBIESECKS!!!!!1111111

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  6. Re:whats really great about this by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm no legal expert but ...

    Don't worry. Neither are the RIAA's lawyers.

    --
    Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
  7. Re:Discovery burden by rabidkumquat · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) Introduce entire copyrighted catalog of RIAA as material evidence
    2) Request public records of proceedings
    3) ????
    4) Profit!

    sheer elegance in its simplicity!

    --
    under construction
  8. Funny story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I changed my routers MAC address to DE:AD:BE:EF:BA:BE

    The problem is, I forgot all about it for roughly 2 years.
    Right up until the time I had to call my ISP about something. The tech on the other end asked me what kind of router I had and when I told him, he says "No, you don't have (brand x)". I'm thinking "wtf is he talking about?" because the router is, literally, right there in front of me. So we argued about it for about 10 minutes and I finally got done what I needed.

    After we hung up, I realized why he was asking....

    Now, I can't help but wonder whose router he THINKS I have? Who the hell would use DEADBEEFBABE as a default MAC address?