Slashdot Mirror
Bush Administration's E-Mail Deluge May Overload Archive System
Lucas123 writes "The Clinton administration generated 32 million e-mails. Bush's administration has generated 50 times as much data — 140TB, 20TB of which is email — which soon will have to be archived through a new government-built records management system. The new system may not be up to the task because the technology behind it may not be able to handle the sheer volume of data along with the fact that the Bush administration has been slow in providing the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) with needed information about the records, according to a Computerworld story. Questions have also been raised about millions of missing e-mails from between March 2003 and October 2006. 'It wasn't until this summer that an intensive effort began to share information,' said Ken Thibodeau, director of NARA's Electronic Records Archives."
"The Clinton administration generated 32 million e-mails. Bush's administration has generated 50 times as much data -- 140TB, 20TB of which is email -- which soon will have to be archived through a new government-built records management system.
Well, to be fair, email wasn't quite as popular during Clinton's administration as it is now. Then again, the 400GB of e-mails that the Clinton administration must have generated (if it is 50 times less than 20TB) must have been rather hard to store when he left office.
...Now too many many emails.
Whining is Washington's most favorite thing to do.
No more fancy signatures and html crap will cause a 60-80% drop in volume if not more.
Mandate the Usenet way with replies after the original, (it will) teach people to cut irrelevant repeats.
Stop the addition of stupid and ineffective disclaimers.
Teach the use of (ftp) servers for sharing large documents, no more Microsoft sized attachments, send a link.
"The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
Besides, only 140TB (or 20 TB)? That's child's play for any competent DB admin, never mind only about $2k worth of hardware to hold it.
Assuming that none of it's been put into the archival system yet, that means they're dumping 140TB on it in one go.
You index 140TB on $2k worth of hardware and come back to me when you're done. Hopefully I won't have died by then.
No; you are partisan when you think an accusation against one side can be answered by an accusation against the other side. They are both bad (they are US politicians; corruption is so endemic that it's legal and called lobbying), but Clinton's presidency ended about eight years ago and isn't something worth discussing now.
The questions are; how to make sure Bush follows the law for what he still does? How to make sure Obama doesn't start off like Bush?
=~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
It has come to my attention that as I prepare to leave office my previous instructions to make all email and other documentation available to the shredder was incorrect. The correct policy is to make everything available to the archiver. If you have any concerns please feel free to pick up a copy of the standard presidential pardon boilerplate from my secretary's desk. Thank you, W
If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
Maybe not $2k worth of hardware but $200k will do. Which is still peanuts in government terms. They probably spend that amount on paperclips and toilet paper in the pentagon alone.
Honestly, storing and indexing 140TB of e-mail is a trivial task when you can apply a six digit budget to it.
If their "archival system" blinks at the sight of 140TB of mostly text then it doesn't even deserve the name.
Perhaps you're too young to remember, but Clinton's administration had a problem with missing emails during investigations too (Lewinsky, why hundreds of FBI records on their political enemies ended up in the White House, illegal campaign donations from China, etc).
Yes, but there is a magnitude of difference in importance between lost emails about blow jobs and a little dirty money, and emails about the loss of privacy and civil liberties of US citizens, torture of POWs, and the various other nastiness that GWB et al are suspected of. Much different.
If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
As with almost all problems where electronic/internet technologies bump into real life issues eg privacy, non-repudiability and simple confidence it is because the Law has not kept up with technology, and that in the USA is the responsibility of the Congress. Writing was thousands of years old, and the printing-press more than 300 years old when the Constitution was adopted in September 17, 1787. The drafters understood the technology.
Today we are blessed with ignorant self serving legislators who do not, and are far too happy to follow hard-case makes bad law hurd thought, eg children, porn, paedophilia, drugs and terrorism. The courts have long held that you can read post-cards, but that if your letter-in-an-envelope is opened then a felony is committed or the information is normally in-admissible.
For this to work people have to start encrypting and signing their e-mails and the Congress and the SCOTUS must enforce identical rules for electronic and hand-written communication.
Specifically you can not go out and discover the entire contents of someone's library and papers in a law suite, and expect to go on a search-engine enabled fishing expedition.