Slashdot Mirror


Harnessing Slow Water Currents For Renewable Energy

Julie188 writes "Slow-moving ocean and river currents could be a new, reliable and affordable alternative energy source. A University of Michigan engineer, Michael Bernitsas, has made a machine that works like a fish to turn potentially destructive vibrations in fluid flows into clean, renewable power. This is is the first known device that could harness energy from most of the water currents around the globe because it works in flows moving slower than 2 knots (about 2.3 miles per hour). Most of the Earth's currents are slower than 3 knots. Turbines and water mills need an average of 5 or 6 knots to operate efficiently. Further details and a few brief movies of the technology are available, as well as a video explanation by Professor Bernitsas himself."

10 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. Secondary effects? by Vellmont · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not a fluid mechanic, but I wonder what the effects would be of slowing down already slow moving river water. Increased silt deposits? More flooding upstream? Anyone with more knowledge about river flows care to comment?

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Secondary effects? by sdpuppy · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Sounds like the energy is taken from eddy and vortex currents which, for the most part, is lost energy anyway (destructive interference) and don't add to river currents anyway.

      If it works (both technologically and financially) , it's brilliant - harnessing energy that would be lost anyway.

  2. SeaQuest DSV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They implemented a global underwater power grid in the SeaQuest television show (from the 90's). There's some interesting technology in that show. It's on Netflix/Roku for immediate viewing.

    -m

  3. Doubling the Global Warming Reduction by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Replacing petrofuels (and even their waste heat) with this alternative generator would help slow climate change from the eliminated petrofuel waste.

    But there's a vast amount of energy already retained in the Earth's oceano-atmospheric system. Vast rivers of undersea currents now store truly huge amounts of energy newly accumulated since industry's byproducts started the Earth retaining more energy. Undersea currents have grown much twistier in their paths around the globe. When that energy cycles through the interconnected systems on its own rhythms, the energy is sometimes transmitted into other media than seawater, that is much more disturbed by it. This is what the El Nino / La Nina cycle is an instance of: energy from heavy sea currents periodically enters the much lighter air, pushing it around much more. That kind of cycle, in a myriad of other such interactions, contributes to larger and more frequent storms.

    If we harvested some of that energy from these currents with these new devices, we would be reducing the energy in those currents. The currents would return to their previous less twisty tracks. They would have less energy to transmit to the atmosphere and other climate engines. It would take a very large scale deployment, over a substantial period of time. But the double benefit would be well worth it.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  4. The Æolian Harp by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This technology works the same way as Davinci's "aeolian harp", as immortalized in The Æolian Harp by Samuel Taylor Coleridge:

    The Æolian Harp

    My pensive SARA ! thy soft cheek reclined
    Thus on mine arm, most soothing sweet it is
    To sit beside our Cot, our Cot o'ergrown
    With white-flower'd Jasmin, and the broad-leav'd Myrtle,
    (Meet emblems they of Innocence and Love !)
    And watch the clouds, that late were rich with light,
    Slow saddenning round, and mark the star of eve
    Serenely brilliant (such should Wisdom be)
    Shine opposite ! How exquisite the scents
    Snatch'd from yon bean-field ! and the world so hush'd !
    The stilly murmur of the distant Sea
    Tells us of silence.
            And that simplest Lute,
    Plac'd length-ways in the clasping casement, hark !
    How by the desultory breeze caress'd,
    Like some coy maid half-yielding to her lover,
    It pours such sweet upbraiding, as must needs
    Tempt to repeat the wrong ! And now, its strings
    Boldlier swept, the long sequacious notes
    Over delicious surges sink and rise,
    Such a soft floating witchery of sound
    As twilight Elfins make, when they at eve
    Voyage on gentle gales from Faery-Land,
    Where Melodies round honey-dropping flowers,
    Footless and wild, like birds of Paradise,
    Nor pause, nor perch, hovering on untam'd wing !
    O ! the one Life within us and abroad,
    Which meets all motion and becomes its soul,
    A light in sound, a sound-like power in light,
    Rhythm in all thought, and joyance every where--
    Methinks, it should have been impossible
    Not to love all things in a world so fill'd ;
    Where the breeze warbles, and the mute still air
    Is Music slumbering on her instrument.
            And thus, my Love ! as on the midway slope
    Of yonder hill I stretch my limbs at noon,
    Whilst thro' my half-clos'd eye-lids I behold
    The sunbeams dance, like diamonds, on the main,
    And tranquil muse upon tranquility ;
    Full many a thought uncall'd and undetain'd,
    And many idle flitting phantasies,
    Traverse my indolent and passive brain,
    As wild and various, as the random gales
    That swell and flutter on this subject Lute !
            And what if all of animated nature
    Be but organic Harps diversly fram'd,
    That tremble into thought, as o'er them sweeps
    Plastic and vast, one intellectual breeze,
    At once the Soul of each, and God of all ?
            But thy more serious eye a mild reproof
    Darts, O belovéd Woman ! nor such thoughts
    Dim and unhallow'd dost thou not reject,
    And biddest me walk humbly with my God.
    Meek Daughter in the Family of Christ !
    Well hast thou said and holily disprais'd
    These shapings of the unregenerate mind ;
    Bubbles that glitter as they rise and break
    On vain Philosophy's aye-babbling spring.
    For never guiltless may I speak of him,
    The Incomprehensible ! save when with awe
    I praise him, and with Faith that inly feels ;
    Who with his saving mercies healéd me,
    A sinful and most miserable man,
    Wilder'd and dark, and gave me to possess
    Peace, and this Cot, and thee, heart-honour'd Maid !

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  5. That acronym is so 1980's... by mangu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    FTFA: "VIVACE stands for Vortex Induced Vibrations for Aquatic Clean Energy"

    There was a time when creating an acronym that made a real word was considered cute. Those were the days of the "ESPRIT" (Estimation of Signal Parameters via Rotational Invariance Techniques) and "MUSIC" (MUltiple SIgnal Classification) algorithms.

    All that is in the past. These days, acronyms should Google well. Google for VIVACE, MUSIC, or ESPRIT and you'll get page after page of irrelevant sites. Scientists should try to name their projects with unique names, names that will let interested people search the web and *find* their projects.

    1. Re:That acronym is so 1980's... by xant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And how is Google going to do a better job of searching? Magically discern your intent from the keywords you typed in? Keywords is all we have. Make your keywords better.

      Suppose "what you want" is to name your project "The". Is there some way Google is going to find that when someone wants to learn about "The"? A search for the project's name would be completely useless, and no UI change or smarter algorithm is going to fix that as long as you search by typing into a text field. What a searcher would end up doing is typing in other relevant keywords, and not even including "The" as a keyword because it would serve no purpose. So your project would be indexed on the relevant keywords, which suggests that you should have named it using better keywords in the first place.

      --
      It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  6. Re:Oceans, Not Rivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I can see a use for this in rivers as well, especially in the last few hundred miles.

    Currently, there are plenty of rivers that have to slow down the waterflow near the banks to maintain the deep summerbed. Replacing whatever structure there currently is with the "fishes" sounds like a nice experiment.

  7. Stealing energy from nature by DrugCheese · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Burning oils found in the earth - Yeah I can understand how that'd be bad for the environment
    Stealing raw energy from water or air - Couldn't this be even worse for the environment?

    Just because it's 'clean' and doesn't create any byproduct doesn't mean the earth is gonna be O.K. with it? Even solar energy, as long as the panels to collect are on earth, are disrupting the natural state of things (better then asphalt though)

    Solar panels in space, is the only 'clean' energy that would have no effect besides maybe blocking the view of Sol from far away systems.

    $.02

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  8. A few alternatives by ishmaelflood · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Self rectifying water turbine, always turns the same way even if the water flow reverses

    http://www.cetusenergy.com.au/action.php

    and if you really want fishy like motion then

    http://www.biopowersystems.com/biostream.php

    The thing is enormous - 50 feet high, generating 300 hp. Full size proto is under construction.