Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Can You Be Denied the Right To Support OSS?

Posted by Soulskill on from the oss-enterprise dept.

jerico.dev writes "I am currently selecting a CM tool for a project. Important condition: the software must be OSI compliant. I considered Alfresco, since they call themselves 'open source.' Then I heard from several of Alfresco's partners that they are not allowed to do projects based on Alfresco's GPL edition because their partnership contract denied them the right to do so. They only can support Alfresco's enterprise edition. But Alfresco's VP of business development Matt Asay told me that their enterprise edition is not OSI compliant. Does anyone in the Slashdot crowd have experience with partner contracts of other OSS vendors? Is it normal that Sun, Red Hat, etc. force their partners to decline projects based on their open source editions? It's probably legal to do so, but do you think it is legitimate and fair?"

1 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I was denied from even using OSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "railroad you like a municipal court?" Heh. I like that. Very astute!

    But yes, I recently lost a job due to OSS. I feel sad that I'm happy about losing that job. (Surely the Germans must have a word for that.)

    Anyways, this was a new job. These folks talked a good game. They knew all the right things to say during the interviews. It sounded promising...

    They hired me to develop C++ applications under Linux. I showed up for work only to discover I'd be restricted to using Outlook/IE. Installing, let alone using, Firefox was forbidden. I asked the obvious question. (How to use Outlook/IE under Linux?) Turns out their programmers get a Windows box on their desktop with Hummingbird X-Windows software installed, and need to share a common Linux machine with other developers. We were cautioned against using too many resources on that machine, because after all it is SHARED...

    Moving on to the NDA. It's a little overly broad, perhaps unintentionally giving them rights to whatever I develop during my off-hours. Without compensation, of course. I dabble in open-source, so this is a small matter of concern. I tried to negotiate more reasonable terms. (I'm happy to give them rights to anything they pay for.) They seemed to feel that, since they use [purchase] open-source software, my developing open-source software in my off-hours constituted a conflict of interest and promptly rescinded their offer of employment.

    I'm a lucky man. Somebody up above was watching out for me that day!

    I've since learned that they're on a death-march. I'm now hearing rumors that their coding standards, which I did not get to see, prohibit casting between base and derived classes, amongst other atrocities. But thankfully I can't confirm that.