Ubiquitous Hydrogen Power Not Getting Any Closer
NewScientist has a story about the "hydrogen economy" that has been resting on the horizon for a decade or more. Despite a great deal of enthusiasm for and research into hydrogen-based power systems, the technology seems just as far away from everyday use as it's always been. A British startup, ITM Power, has recently claimed a breakthrough in lowering production costs by using a nickel catalyst (rather than platinum) with a membrane small enough for home use. But, even if their method is proven and adopted, it still wouldn't address huge energy efficiency problems in the process. "The point was made forcefully by Gary Kendall of the conservation group WWF in a recent report called Plugged In (PDF, pgs. 135-149). Kendall, a chemist who previously spent almost a decade working for ExxonMobil, highlights how the energy losses in the fuel chain - from electrolysis to compression of the hydrogen for use to inefficiencies in the fuel cell itself — mean that only 24 per cent of the energy used to make the fuel does any useful work on the road."
You forgot to capitalize some words in your post. I've corrected most below (boldfaced), though I might have missed a few:
"and nuclear energy which is finite in terms of ore and has its own refining/purification and infrastructure costs."
Congratulations, I see you managed to read an entire line of text. Try a little harder and perhaps you can manage the second line next time.
In case you're still reading, one could argue that even nuclear isotopes can eventually be traced back to the fusion happening inside the sun, but that was long enough ago to perhaps consider nuclear to be a "second" power source, which is why I mentioned it as such.
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.