Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Greenpeace Slams Apple For Environmental Record

Posted by Soulskill on from the green-apple-get-it dept.

nandemoari writes "According to a recent advertisement airing on American TV, Apple's new Macbooks (well-received by most technology critics) are 'the world's greenest family of notebooks.' It seems an indication that the Cupertino-based company is increasingly aware of a consumer base that demands green electronics. However, Greenpeace is less than enthused with Apple's overall green performance. In their report (PDF), the environmentalists argue that Apple 'needs to commit to phasing out additional substances with timelines, improve its policy on chemicals and its reporting on chemicals management.'" Ars Technica points out that Greenpeace's research isn't quite up-to-snuff, and it's also worth noting that Greenpeace admitted to targeting Apple for the publicity in the past.

4 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. Greenpeace? by BigBadBus · · Score: 5, Informative

    The same twonks behind this story?. I might have considered giving money to them at some point, but now, the answer is a definite no.

    --
    My web domain.
  2. Re:Greenpeace - research by canadian_right · · Score: 4, Informative

    Greenpeace lost its way a long time ago. Even one of its founders couldn't stomach its new direction.

    There is no "Great Bear Rain-Forest". I live where it is supposed to be and they just made that up for publicity. There is a rain forest, and it has bears, but no one outside of Greenpeace calls it that.

    They used to do good. Now they are just fear mongers.

    --
    Anarchists never rule
  3. Re:Flawed study by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem is that Apple can't provide the information that Greenpeace want. Last time greenpeace did this study, apple got marked down for having no schedule for removing PVC from their packaging. The reason apple had no such schedule was that they hadn't used PVC in their packaging since 1990.

  4. Re:Isn't this "vigilantism"? by Reziac · · Score: 4, Informative

    I agree with you -- Greenpeace today is nothing but a vigilante extortion business (and so are nearly all the once-useful activist groups). See http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/131

    Minus the environmentalist rhetoric, they'd be recognised as the thugs they are, little different from any other protection racket.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?