Slashdot Mirror


FCC Considering Free Internet For USA

jbolden writes "According to the Wall Street Journal, the FCC is considering a plan to provide free wireless internet. The plan would involve some level of filtering, but might allow adults to opt out. CTIA has argued that this business model has traditionally failed (see Slate magazine's analysis as to why)."

19 of 502 comments (clear)

  1. Tax Dollars by y86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WOW! Something that my tax dollars pay for that MIGHT actually benefit me? Neat-o.

    I mean welfare and social security is great, but besides the roads and military it would be nice to get some value back.

    1. Re:Tax Dollars by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You ever eat food that didn't kill you ? (FDA), or drink water? How about housing the hard core criminals in prison?

      Does it snow in your area? Plows are a nice thing to have.

      Sure there is a lot of waste in government, but you get a lot more benefit then you are giving them credit for.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:Tax Dollars by omeomi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, and then once the FCC has effectively made internet within the US a public resource, they can start censoring it with the same crazy arbitrary rules they use for broadcast TV. No thanks, I think I'd like to stick to the private model.

    3. Re:Tax Dollars by LandDolphin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is pretty much their goal. But, that's fine as long as you still have the option to purchase unfiltered internet from the current ISPs.

      Filtered Internet is better then no internet for a lot of people.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    4. Re:Tax Dollars by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about housing the hard core criminals in prison?

      Yeah, I'm sure all 2 million of them are way too dangerous to be let out on the street. No, this money is wasted housing petty criminals and drug users, while Bush and his crew, and let's not forget the CEOs of every investment bank in the country are free.

      More people are arrested for marijuana possession in this country than EVERY OTHER VIOLENT CRIME COMBINED! Is that what you call a good use of tax payer resources?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Tax Dollars by jank1887 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      well have no fear, the same program guarantees that other people will help pay for your disability or retirement in the event you need it, instead of having you just starve to death. And if you don't need it? great, glad to hear it. be thankful that the program would have supported you if you did.

    6. Re:Tax Dollars by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Try using a real source, like The Constitution, not some propaganda farm.

      Preamble:

      We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

      Article 1, Section 8:

      To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

      Its supported just like the US Military is. Now please take your fascist BS to someplace more appropriate; if you don't like China, try Iran, or Saudi Arabia. They're all more to suited to you.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  2. Could be a great idea! by rotide · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Obviously you can't be looking for 10mbps connections to watch streaming video and download isos. But think about a simple internet connection that allows for basic web browsing, email use, IM texting, etc.

    Out on the road? Can't find an open WiFi hotspot to check google maps? Solved.

    Out on the road? Want to download the newest HD episode of your show? Ya, you're going to want to get a connection from a paid-for ISP.

  3. Some level of filtering by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And a hell of a lot of monitoring...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  4. Government-run communications by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't want the government to be my ISP, and I really don't like the implications of having a net connection that is so directly controlled by the government. The fact that filtering is even mentioned at all suggests what a potentially bad idea this really is. Filtering, surveillance and the displacement of unfiltered commercial alternatives? No thanks.

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. panopticon by globaljustin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    from TFA:

    a plan to offer free, pornography-free wireless Internet service to all Americans

    To address concerns about the filter, the FCC is proposing that adults could opt out and access all Internet sites.

    Yeah, just type in your social security number and your password...

    Age verification = no privacy...on a government network at least...

    I really can't imagine a more effective way for the government to track and monitor the activities of its citizens. Which is bad. Normally I would love the idea, even if it had to be offered at slower speeds, but unless we make it open, with NO AGE VERIFICATION or anything of that sort we're just asking for 1984...

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  7. This isn't the Internet - it's filter data access by yourpusher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The free service could be slower and would be required to filter out pornography and other material not suitable for children.

    Right, the same FCC that is fining stations hundreds of thousands of dollars because they didn't bleep out Bono's "fucking brilliant" in time will determine what is and isn't suitable content accessible through this service.

    Fuck that.

  8. Wishful thinking... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People will absorb ANY amount of bandwidth if it's free. This thing will ALWAYS be overloaded and unusable. Period.

    --
    No sig today...
  9. Re:"Free" is relative by LandDolphin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But that invovled people actually doing something. It is much easier for them to sit back and complain about other people/Government.

    --
    Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
  10. Re:And while I highly doubt this... by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The effectiveness or lack thereof, is not the problem. The bigger problem is as follows:

    First, They intend this thing to be available to the majority of the population, that means it will be a significant market force and not just some kind of low income, rural internet access for those who don't have one now. That means even if i choose not to use it, i will be affected by it in some way.

    Second, these people, M2Z (the company) and the ones pushing for this behind the scenes, jumped right to porn when the question of blocking came up. Why porn? That question must be asked. Why not violence? Why not hate speech? Why not unhealthy recipes for sweets? Are we protecting children, or imposing a social agenda on the population? If you are going to block something, other things should be higher on your priority list if your excuse is protecting the children. Something tells me protecting children isn't the goal, or rather the idiots involved think porn is the most harmful thing children (or anyone?) could see on the internet.

    Next, it isn't free either, it's ad-supported. No matter what, i am funding your censorship of me by using this network. They are either going to be altering traffic transparently, or forcing users to use a proxy, or run a desktop client (substantially limiting its usefulness) to show you those ads. And they are going to be selectively blocking one type of content unless you pay more as the summary states (maybe).

    Those 2 things, altering traffic to show ads, and selective content delivery or prioritization (network neutrality etc), are things the FCC has been railing against for a long time. It is a conflict of interest for the FCC to be encouraging these things in one situation while profiting from the thing, while blasting other ISPs for doing the same thing.

    I can only hope this entire thing fails at this point, it's a somewhat good idea, being hampered and fucked with through government interference and mandate (which might even be unconstitutional), and behind the scenes influence.

  11. Re:USA where Internet is a right and Heathcare isn by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Obviously you've never received care in a wealthy European nation. After spending some time overseas coming back to the US's healthcare system is like going back in time to the middle ages. "Oh, you wont cover that? You say its pre-existing? You wont pay for that test by doctor wants? Oh only $800 deductible? Oh, another bill from another readjustment? Oh, I lost my job and wont have insurance for two months and COBRA is 800 a month?"

    >Government screws up everything it touches.

    Bullshit. Certain people in power want you to believe competent government cant exist, but it does all over the world. Republicans love to sell you on this line because it helps their corporate masters make more money and provides an excuse for their corruption in office. Perhaps you should be voting in the guy who is willing to do things right as opposed to resigning yourself to shitty government run by shitty people.

  12. Re:Free internet? by bladesjester · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can't use your home phone to talk 24/7

    You have clearly never seen a house full of teenage girls. lol

    --
    Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  13. Re:And while I highly doubt this... by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...and how long do you think that the restrictions will be limited to just porn and you can opt out? We have things like the "fairness doctrine" being kicked around in Congress to censor political speech on radio and **AA legislation for physical media. Once you give the government control, the cat is out of the bag and not going back in. Why do you think this will be one iota different?

    --
    Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.