Slashdot Mirror


Groklaw's PJ Says SCO's Demise Greatly Exaggerated

blackbearnh writes "Last week, the net was all abuzz with speculation that SCO was finally gone and done for. With the final judgment in SCO v. Novell in, and SCO millions of dollars in the hole to Novell, it seemed like the fat lady had finally sung. But like most things in the legal system, it isn't nearly that simple. O'Reilly Media sought out Groklaw's Pamela Jones, and got a rundown of what's still alive, and why a final end to the madness may be many years away. 'Summing up, it looks bleak for SCO at the moment, but let's enter the alternate realm of SCO's best-case scenario in its dreams: in that realm, SCO wins on appeal, which one of SCO's lawyers indicated might take a year and a half or five years, and the case is sent back to Utah for trial by jury, which is what SCO wanted (as opposed to trial by judge, which is what it got), then everything listed above (except for the IPO class action) comes alive again, presumably, depending on what the appellate court decides. Then SCO is in position once again to go after Linux end users, as well as IBM, et al.'"

3 of 152 comments (clear)

  1. Bologna. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    PJ, the arch-censor of Groklaw, desperately needs you to believe this

    To believe that it's possible, or to believe that it's probable?

    It seems like if she was looking for job security she would be arguing that it's probable. Instead she's arguing that it's possible. And we all know what possible means. I have a lottery ticket in my pocket. It's possible I've won. Sure as hell wouldn't call it probable though.

    And FWIW, Groklaw does far more than merely keep an eye on SCO. Just the other day there was a good article about the Bilski ruling over on Groklaw. The Groklaw front page also has items about the cyberbullying case, and Harvard having a youtube channel.

    If there's one thing PJ has probably learned from following the SCO story from the beginning is that you don't put all your eggs in a single basket.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  2. Re:Please by blackbearnh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh yes, they were lawyers, albeit providing advice pro bono. One is even a bankruptcy attorney, who gave me explicit advice how I could have stayed in the game had I wanted to make the effort.

  3. Re:OT but I don't care by u38cg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reading between the lines, it's pretty obvious that the /. crew have lost control of the site except on editorial matters. This post ought to convince you, if nothing else will. Note in particular the time interval in which those employees posted.

    --
    [FUCK BETA]