Slashdot Mirror
Groklaw's PJ Says SCO's Demise Greatly Exaggerated
blackbearnh writes "Last week, the net was all abuzz with speculation that SCO was finally gone and done for. With the final judgment in SCO v. Novell in, and SCO millions of dollars in the hole to Novell, it seemed like the fat lady had finally sung. But like most things in the legal system, it isn't nearly that simple. O'Reilly Media sought out Groklaw's Pamela Jones, and got a rundown of what's still alive, and why a final end to the madness may be many years away. 'Summing up, it looks bleak for SCO at the moment, but let's enter the alternate realm of SCO's best-case scenario in its dreams: in that realm, SCO wins on appeal, which one of SCO's lawyers indicated might take a year and a half or five years, and the case is sent back to Utah for trial by jury, which is what SCO wanted (as opposed to trial by judge, which is what it got), then everything listed above (except for the IPO class action) comes alive again, presumably, depending on what the appellate court decides. Then SCO is in position once again to go after Linux end users, as well as IBM, et al.'"
This is not a troll.
--
If they're under 16, you're only allowed to do them in your head! (re: multiplication tables, too)
The second "groklaw" story in 3 hours. What gives? is someone being paid to plant them?.
/.'ers stopped reading groklaw when they saw the type of deleting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H moderating that goes on over there.
Most
Who cares any more? It was a decent site once, however, when they started just deleting dissenting voices. Nuff said.
If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
Yes, and they do it very frequently.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."