Apple Believes Someone Is Behind Psystar
rgraham writes "From the article on Growler: 'Apple apparently believes that somebody else is behind Psystar, which might help to explain why a major law firm would take on what seems like a fly-by-night's case; also why Psystar has been so bold in continuing to sell its products. I knew this thing felt funny. As Alice in Wonderland might put it, "It gets interestinger and interestinger."'"
Don't be ridiculous, it's Darl McBride!
I love this logic that a lot of you are using here, which is basically this: Apple is such a huge company why would they bother attacking such a small company unless that company is backed by someone else
This is pretty much the same logic that has been used time and time again by ultra-conservative patriot types when they try to justify why the United States invaded their tiny republic. "I'm bigger so i must be right, I heard they were backed by communists!"
Oh crap, i hope i don't get sued here, does anyone know if apple patented the analogy yet?
Jealous much? Jesus Toilet-Licking Christ, your post is so pathetically transparent. You really should seek counseling for your inferiority issues.
You forgot that people buys Macs because Apple monitors look best with their orange sunglasses.
Flexible bare-metal recovery for Linux/UNIX
well that's rubbish. no need to be specific since in my corprorate environment none of what you say is remotely true. You must have a lot of certified spastics on your staff.