Slashdot Mirror


Adobe Building Zoetrope, a Web "Time Machine"

Khuffie writes "Adobe, along with the University of Washington, are developing Zoetrope, an application that will offer a dynamic new view of the web. It is hard to explain on paper, but you can see a brilliant video of the application in action. Essentially, Zoetrope will allow users to travel back in time through a website, and see how the website gets changed. A user can create lenses on the website, for example, focusing on the price of a DVD at Amazon, and see how the price went up and down over the coming months. More interestingly, you can link lenses together across different websites, and for example, see how the price of gas was affected by say, the aggregated google news result of 'war.'"

36 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. I feel like... by Facegarden · · Score: 4, Funny

    I feel like there is a porn joke in here somewhere...
    -Taylor

    --
    Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    1. Re:I feel like... by DeadDecoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's awesome. You could see the internet before: goatse, tub girl, and 2-girls on cup. Think of all the things you could un-watch!
      Hell, I could un-rick-roll myself, thereby destroying that meme forever!

    2. Re:I feel like... by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Funny

      O god... watching Pam Anderson change from the pretty girl-next-door to monster of modern science she is.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    3. Re:I feel like... by hal2814 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think that's such a good idea. Un-goatse yourself now and next thing you know you'll be clicking through a lively discussion, see a good point with a reference so some "goatse" site (probably some sort of wiki), click the link, and then NOOOOOOO!!!! There's the goatse all over again.

    4. Re:I feel like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You've just postulated the endless goatse loop!

    5. Re:I feel like... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      O god... watching Pam Anderson change from the pretty girl-next-door to monster of modern science she is.

      Screw that. FTS, emphasis mine:

      A user can create lenses on the website, for example, focusing on the price of a DVD at Amazon, and see how the price went up and down over the coming months.

      Not only can we use Zoetrope to view the past versions, we can apparently use it to see the future versions. Wait until I create a lens on some stock-tracking site... I'll be rich enough to pay for Pam to have all her work undone... or for her to complete her metamorphosis into Boobarella.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  2. it can see into the future! by Digitus1337 · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . and see how the price went up and down over the coming months.

    This is all I need to make the change from more traditional investments to a DVD-based retirement plan!

  3. Archive.org by chonglibloodsport · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Guess they haven't heard of the Wayback Machine.

    1. Re:Archive.org by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the whole point of this is the analysis capability. It's not just snapshots of old web pages. For that matter it might use archive.org as its data source.

    2. Re:Archive.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it will be just like Archive.org but with valuable statistics gathering that I'm sure Adobe will give away for free. /sarcasm

      Basically, after having read the article I see this as a tool for creating "Business Intelligence" rather than simple Internet Navel Gazing. I'm sure somewhere at Adobe Prime there are marketing meetings deciding how best to secure and sell this information once it is packaged.

    3. Re:Archive.org by Justin+Hopewell · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the article: "Kris Carpenter, who directs efforts to record Web pages at the Internet Archive, is enthusiastic about the new tool. "This is a fantastic leap forward," she says, adding that Zoetrope could be used as a stand-alone application or eventually become part of the browser. "The advances of the interface are phenomenal in terms of being able to navigate data in a very different way and associate it across websites," Carpenter says. "I think most users have an interest in trying to connect the dots between different sources of information, but there are almost no tools available to make that an easy thing to do." She adds that the Internet Archive is interested in sharing its data with the Zoetrope researchers."

    4. Re:Archive.org by negRo_slim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Guess they haven't heard of the Wayback Machine.

      Well except for the fact The Archive now retroactively obeys robots.txt made it all but worthless the last half dozen times I was there.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    5. Re:Archive.org by Toonol · · Score: 5, Funny

      Use the wayback machine to visit it before it started retroactively honoring robots.txt.

    6. Re:Archive.org by ClassMyAss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like a gimmick taped onto the wayback machine, or any other internet archive, to me.

      Sometimes a gimmick is the difference between something being a major pain in the ass to use and a useful tool, though. Simple user interface improvements can be key, and the wayback machine has a pretty terrible UI (as in, it's very difficult to quickly see how something has changed over days/weeks/months without many, many clicks).

      I, for one, would definitely use this to assist with data scraping, which is something I have to do a lot.

  4. Sloganeering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the blurb:

    More interestingly, you can link lenses together across different websites, and for example, see how the price of gas was affected by say, the aggregated google news result of 'war.'"

    Actually, no... You can't use this tool to see how the one thing was affected by the other. You can see how they both changed with respect to time, but that isn't the same.

    Please to keep in mind the famous Slashdot Mantra: Correlation is not causation.

    1. Re:Sloganeering by Angostura · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please to keep in mind the famous Slashdot Mantra: Correlation is not causation.

      Please bear in mind the slightly less pithy, but more useful version:

      Correlation is not necessarilycausation.

    2. Re:Sloganeering by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or the completely accurate but much less trite version:

      Correlation implies either causation or mutual causation by a third factor.

    3. Re:Sloganeering by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or the completely accurate but much less trite version:

      Correlation implies either causation or mutual causation by a third factor.

      That's not completely accurate. The completely accurate form is:

      Degree of correlation implies a certain probability of some causal link (either direct or through a shared cause.)

      Its quite possible for corresponding values from two completely unrelated sequences to show some degree of correlation, after all. If I have two sequences whose corresponding (e.g., by time) values lok like this:

      S1: 1 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 1
      S2: 2 2 3 4 5 4 3 2 2

      I certainly might suspect that there is a tight correlation between S1 and S2, but each of them could just be random integers chosen from the range 1 to 6, inclusive. Using statistics, I can say how unlikely that coincidence is, but that doesn't mean that I can simply state as a fact that there is a causal link because there is a correlation.

  5. Buried on page 2 of TFA: by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The system is limited, however, by how much historical data is available. To test the tool, the researchers chose 1,000 frequently updated websites and stored information captured every hour over four months.

    But for Zoetrope to cover the entire Web would mean capturing huge amounts of data, says Eytan Adar, a PhD student at the University of Washington who was involved with the research. He has investigated the rates at which people tend to check different pages for updates and says that such information could provide insights into how often pages need to be recorded, thereby reducing the amount of data that needs to be stored. "It's impossible to crawl and capture some of these things at the rate at which they're changing," Adar says. "But for something like Zoetrope, it's a smaller percentage of the Web that we want to track. We don't actually need to get every single page that's out there."

    To make any money, the Zoetrope people will either have to sell this application to websites or setup their own very limited search engine with ads. And if they go search engine style, they'll have no historical data.

    It's a neat idea, but the practical applications are still questionable at best.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Buried on page 2 of TFA: by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can see this working if the websites offer a way through a standardized API to share this information. Then support becomes the problem of the website. If this thing catches on, it would be the best interest of website owners to support it and the users would love it. This is similar in concept to a more complex version of RSS support.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    2. Re:Buried on page 2 of TFA: by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If this thing catches on, it would be the best interest of website owners to support it

      So every mistake made on their website ever is kept around? Mmm, I have a feeling website owners won't be as happy about it as you think.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  6. About The name by syngularyx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Zoetrope sucks

  7. Re:Just so we're on the same page by sexconker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh please. Clearly Adobe, Google, Microsoft, etc. don't have to pay attention to that. Information wants to be free!

  8. Auto-update by syousef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just like Acrobat Reader, the real innovation will be a user interface with options that don't stick, and invasive phone home auto-update technology that is difficult or impossible to switch off. It'll be a time machine allowing you to see just how little Adobe have changed over the years.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Auto-update by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't forget the hideous bloat and geometrically increasing load times with each successive versions.

      The Acrobat Reader was a bizarre creature. The first couple versions were almost unusably bad, then they finally got it right around version 4, and each successive version has been bigger, slower and less useful (even if it supported more features). Like Windows 2000, Office 97, and the old /. user homepages... something that actually worked really well but was ruined by the relentless, mindless drive to Add More Stuff.

      I could never figure out how software developers can make a program that does something simple quickly, and then add a ton of features and end up with a version that is 10 times slower to do the exact same simple thing it used to do quickly. Moore's Law has created a generation of retarded programmers.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  9. It sure does and it's taken. by Samschnooks · · Score: 2, Informative
  10. Anyone else find this scary? by NinthAgendaDotCom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The power of the Internet to retain acts, deeds, and knowledge for so long is disturbing to me. There are Usenet posts I made 10 years ago that will never go away.

    --
    -- http://ninthagenda.com/
  11. Skeptical... by grumbel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The presented features do look nifty, especially the graph, but one big problem I see is that the timespans it can process will likely end up rather short. Webpage design changes over time and when that happens lensing will get troublesome, since content might no longer be where it used to be. Also the tool only seems to work on portal pages, while most real content is hidden in some sub page, which naturally doesn't have much of a history.

  12. cliches in the digital age by mblase · · Score: 3, Funny

    It is hard to explain on paper,

    ...which is okay, since neither one of us is using any.

    Always makes me wonder: when was the last time anybody actually "dialed" a phone? And someday kids will wonder why it's called "YouTube" when they've only ever watched it on a thin, flat LCD screen....

    1. Re:cliches in the digital age by mea37 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My inner pedant would assert that "dial" doesn't mean what you think it means. Meaning comes from usage; etymology just tries to make some sense of it.

      But whatever, I'll play along: Actually, I have a rotary phone still hooked up. I almost never use it. In fact, I put it in a guest room. I find it funny (but I'm not sure if my guests do). I do test it from time to time to make sure the network where I live will still handle pulse dialing; surprisingly it will. So I've "dialed" a phone (in the sense you mean) within the past month.

  13. Like diff... for the web by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful
    --
    We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
  14. See prices go up and down in the COMING months?!? by noidentity · · Score: 4, Funny

    A user can create lenses on the website, for example, focusing on the price of a DVD at Amazon, and see how the price went up and down over the coming months

    1. See how the price of a stock "went" up and down over the coming months.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!!!

    Any ideas on step 2? It's escaping me at the moment...

  15. Wow by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The tool looks really REALLY powerful. They really need to change it so it can be more easily used by the noob though. I would even suggest that the links showing trends can be linked to. That way if you want to make a point in a debate you can point someone to your lensed construct. Or there can be sites that will list interesting correlations like in blogs or w/e. Here it would be VERY useful. If they make it a web-based system with no download it would be much much more powerful again. The only big problem I see is the implementation. Gathering so much info is hard not impossible but! following information as sites move and evolve will be impossible. I think they will need to be able to grab historical data as will as a sites own history... for example instead of linking to your own graph allow linking to google stocks or google trends. A lot of those reach back to the 70s which is more useful than the last 8mnths.

  16. Nerd Mashup! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone photomorph tubgirl with a Klein bottle.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  17. Re: another ... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Followed by Microsoft announcing "Tropz"!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  18. Is it really that hard? by glwtta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it's only hard to explain "on paper" if you insist on using nonsensical phrases like "will allow users to travel back in time through a website". How hard is it to just say "will show website changes over time"?

    Looks pretty cool, though.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi