Slashdot Mirror


Should Apple Open Source the iPhone?

An anonymous reader writes "Given the OpeniBoot project is just a breath away from getting Android onto the iPhone, maybe Apple should consider opening up the platform. This post has five reasons, but I think there are far more. Without open source, Apple will find itself in the same position as today's Microsoft in seven years."

2 of 379 comments (clear)

  1. Question: what business are you in? by wumingzi · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Several people have pointed out variations on this, but we'll try again:

    Apple sells hardware. To a certain extent, they sell content. I don't know how much the App Store or iTunes makes for them. Maybe a substantial amount. Hardware is their cash cow. Open source the software, and both pillars of their model are lost.

    Microsoft sells software. That's self-evident.

    OSS companies are generally in the business of selling professional services. i.e., we'll give you the operating system. We will sell you what amounts to a support contract for a small fee per workstation. If you want to integrate it, or make it do clever things, we have people who do that by the hour for a reasonable fee. If you're giving away software running on servers in the back room of a large company, there's good money to be made using that model. If you're selling $200 iPhones? ehhhh, not so much.

  2. Re:Rebuttal by alsta · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Mod the parent up. Seriously. Do it.

    --
    Wealth is the product of man's capacity to think. -Ayn Rand