Slashdot Mirror


Change.gov Uses Google Moderator System

GMonkeyLouie writes "The website for President-elect Obama's transition team, Change.gov, has unveiled a section called Open for Questions, which lets users submit questions and vote them up or down, in an effort to let the collaborative mind produce the questions that are the most important to the American populace (or at least the web-savvy portion). The page is powered by Google Moderator. It was unveiled yesterday, and CNet reports that when they went to post last night, '159,890 had voted on 1,986 questions from 3,255 people.'"

9 of 436 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I've got a question? by Spazztastic · · Score: 4, Informative

    1,986 questions from 3,255 people

    Either a couple thousand people asked the exact same question or some questions are being "lost".

    I skimmed through and saw _many_ duplicate questions, most involving the executive powers that have been abused.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  2. Re:My name is Barack Hussein Obama... by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Informative

    Of course they don't:

    "As President, will you appoint a special prosecutor with impeccable credentials to reopen a comprehensive investigation of 9/11, in order to discover the truth about the events of that terrible day, and find out who was responsible?"

    Here. Also:

    "Will you consider reforming the debt based economy and reinstate a standard of value to the US dollar (such as the Gold, Silver or Infrastructure standards) in order to preserve the value of the dollar and protect it from uncontrolled inflation?"

    Now the cranks can see for themselves just how irrelevant they are.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  3. Re:My name is Barack Hussein Obama... by megamerican · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't forget that they censored questions about Gov. Blagojevich.

    Obama was of course caught lying about him ever meeting with Blagojevich.

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hbJzaVo_Vcuv1HtB1U1eZDQOrQuQD94VL6S03

    In that story Obama states that "I had no contact with the governor or his office, and so I was not aware of what was happening."

    This story, which is only a month old and yet could only be found in the cache of yahoo says otherwise.

    http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=Director+of+Illinois+Dept.+of+Veterans'+Affairs+visits+Quincy&fr=yscpb&u=www.khqa.com/news/story.aspx%3Fid%3D219212&w=director+direct+illinois+il+dept+department+veterans+veteran's+affairs+affair+visits+visit+visiting+quincy&d=Ph3CN0fiR5wF&icp=1&.intl=us

    From November 8.

    "Obama met with Governor Rod Blagojevich earlier this week to discuss it." (refering to the open Senate seat).

    --
    If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
  4. Re:My name is Barack Hussein Obama... by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Informative

    That story you linked to says that people logging in to the site flagged the questions as inappropriate. The questions are still visible on the site.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  5. Re:way to bring your party into power. by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 4, Informative

    I believe that as part of the Presidential Transition Act of 2000 the incoming President is allowed access to the .gov TLD to set up a "transition" web portal. Calm down.

  6. Re:Ahh, true democracy by johnsonav · · Score: 5, Informative

    They should take a Greek political history course or something.

    They don't even have to go back that far. They can simply read The Federalist Papers, specifically Number 10. The founders were nice enough, not only to give us a pretty swell constitution, but also a well thought out defense of the principals it rests upon.

    But you really only need study the actual text of the constitution to find out what they thought about direct democracy: senators chosen by state legislators, the electoral college, and the conspicuous absence of a national vote on anything but amendments (and even then, only sometimes).

    --
    ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
  7. Re:My name is Barack Hussein Obama... by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Do you know why they removed the story? Because the claim was renounced yesterday by KHQA. Sorry to burst your bubble.

  8. Re:way to bring your party into power. by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Informative

    Both the Senate and House Democratic and Republican caucuses have .gov domains, and they are frankly partisan. There's nothing strange about it in the general case.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  9. Re:Whatever by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some people care just like there are some people who insist the Earth is flat. The vast majority don't care about these questions because they see these people as crackpot, rightly or wrongly.

    For example the questions about his birth certificate are vast and intricate. However simple facts have proven them wrong, yet with every bit of proof, the doubters come up with another assertion that proves false. But they keep trying not because there is a conspiracy to keep Obama's birth a secret, but these people will never accept that he was elected President no matter the proof.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.