Slashdot Mirror


Energy-Generating Floors To Power Subway Displays In Tokyo

Jason Sahler writes "When the East Japan Railway Company (JR East) decided to invest in alternative energy sources, it only had to look to its users for the perfect source of energy. Recently the company decided to update their Tokyo Station with a revolutionary new piezoelectric energy generating floor. The system will harvest the kinetic energy generated by crowds to power ticket gates and display systems."

98 comments

  1. Theft of services by Zerth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will I be compensated with lower fares for the reduction of my kinetic & potential energies, or will they just take it as profit?

    1. Re:Theft of services by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Being a Ninja will be punished by a stiff fine.

    2. Re:Theft of services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think this is a pretty cool idea. I can imagine a gym being a great place to do something like this: people go there to "waste" energy (tread-mills, various exercise machines). If they can set up their machines to basically be human powered generators, set resistance based on power output, etc, they might be able to convince people they are helping save the environment. Or at least cut down their electricity costs a bit.

      "You just burned 150 calories and generated X amount of electrical energy" OR "Please maintain a speed of above 5 miles per hour or the tv will lose power and shut off"

    3. Re:Theft of services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No compensation, you are more than free to levitate your way across the floor.

    4. Re:Theft of services by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "Will I be compensated with lower fares for the reduction of my kinetic & potential energies, or will they just take it as profit?"

      considering the immense cost to implement this instead of just plugging into the grid I'd be surprised if the rates didn't increase instead. Think... powering your house with solar instead of electric, but solar when it was brand new and no one had it like "revolutionary new piezoelectric energy generating floors" are currently.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    5. Re:Theft of services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool idea but the amount of power produced by one human might be discouragingly small. Let's see if it's feasible.

      Running at 5 mph a 150lbs person burns around 10 nutritional (*) calories per minute. There are 1.16 Watt-hours per nutritional calorie so after running 60 minutes 10 * 60 * 1.16 = 696 watt-hours of energy will have been spent. Ok, so that enough to keep a 100-watt light bulb lit for 69 minutes assuming perfect efficiency.

      That is not exactly a discouragingly small (and more than I expected) and maybe a nice novelty, but also not really that much of an environmental impact. To put that in perspective, a 1 square meter solar panel would produce an order of magnitude more power than you running ... and the solar panel would be producing power more hours out of the day/week/month.

      Note that there are three reasons this may still be a win for the subway. First, they have a lot of people all the time. Second, they are probably powering very low power devices (e.g. electronics). Finally, harvesting power rather than pulling it from the grid might have secondary advantage such as ... well I don't really know I'm just guessing here.

    6. Re:Theft of services by Nikita613 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it would be any economic gain on this, installing generators, fixing with the electric system, et cetera. That's probably why cars which uses generators instead of brakes are so expensive. Amirite?

    7. Re:Theft of services by JonDorian88 · · Score: 0

      "Please maintain a speed of above 5 miles per hour or the tv will lose power and shut off"

      50 miles per hour if the tv's plasma

      --
      The 14'th amendment was was created to be an option.
  2. And what happens when the batteries drain? by CTalkobt · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can just imagine the batteries draining and the users not familair with the system getting off of a train to find there is no way to exit the gates.

    Of course, they'll then stomp their feet in anger - hopefully hard enough to blink the ticket gates functional again.

    Ah - innovation.

    --
    There's a gorilla from Manilla whose a fella that stinks of vanilla and has salmonella.
    1. Re:And what happens when the batteries drain? by RemoWilliams84 · · Score: 1, Funny

      If internet videos have taught me anything (as I'm certainthey have), it's that their are always going to be enough people humping on the subway to power the whole train if they wanted to.

      --
      "I don't have to think. I only have to do it. The results are always perfect, but that's old news." - Meat Puppets
  3. The Matrix... by Killer+Orca · · Score: 0

    It begins here.

    1. Re:The Matrix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and officially ends just before the rave scene.

    2. Re:The Matrix... by Anubis350 · · Score: 3, Funny

      was there ever any doubt that something involving humans living their entire lives hooked up to machines via tentaclelike hoses *wouldnt* come from japan? :-p

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    3. Re:The Matrix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next up, a panty vending machine powered by the tears of schoolgirls.

    4. Re:The Matrix... by francisstp · · Score: 1

      If only I hadn't wasted all my mod points in Idle... Sorry AC.

  4. What a waste by snowraver1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have a hard time believing that installing thousands of tiny peizoelectric generators in the floor to be either a) better for the environment or b)profitable.

    I would bet that the cost to the environment in producing these special devices, would be greater than the coal that would have been fed into a coal power plant to produce the same amount of power.

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    1. Re:What a waste by tsalmark · · Score: 5, Funny

      SHHHH. The Green Movement is about feeling good, not consuming less.

    2. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      but you are overlooking the smug factor

      Think of how much smug this will release into the atmosphere! The thick, massive smug clouds will certainly cool the Earth by a degree or two.

    3. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would bet that the cost to the environment in producing these special devices, would be greater than the coal that would have been fed into a coal power plant to produce the same amount of power.

      Ah, but the cost to the environment of building the coal power plant is greater than the walking around people would have to do to generate the same amount of power.

      Solution: Build neither. Get our energy from intense prayer.

    4. Re:What a waste by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      depends...did these people eat at Taco Bell recently?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    5. Re:What a waste by Randall311 · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness... how do they expect to generate energy with this? I mean 99% of a subway ride is either you sitting there, or standing room only. Either way, you're not walking around and thus not generating any power unless you are boarding or exiting. I didn't RTFA, are they talking about putting these peizoelectric generators on the floor of the station or the subway car itself? It would probably make more sense to line the damn subway tracks with something like this so that they can "recycle" some of the energy used to power the cars.

    6. Re:What a waste by Randall311 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I think there are already enough Apple stores generating enough massive smug clouds to last a long time. Our grandchildren will never have to worry about a shortness of smug, thanks to Steve Mobbs and Mapple. Think differently.

    7. Re:What a waste by leenks · · Score: 1

      Did you not read the summary either?

      "Recently the company decided to update their Tokyo Station with a revolutionary new piezoelectric energy generating floor. The system will harvest the kinetic energy generated by crowds to power ticket gates and display systems."

    8. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The counter goes to 2.8 Wh, thats the equivalent of 1.6 g of CO2.
      Did somebody say Chindohgu.

  5. Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by gblackwo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It may be a joke that they are stealing PE and KE, but they really are making it slightly harder to walk around. Thus the user will be doing more work- ie- burning more calories.

    1. Re:Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt most people even in Japan have a shortage of calories if they can afford to ride the subway. It's a minor health benefit for people who overeat so long as they don't make it too much harder.

    2. Re:Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They should install this at Wal-Mart.

    3. Re:Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much could be generated from the bouncing that the passengers do as they RIDE the trains/subways. They aren't walking much, so the impact to them should be negligible.

      Layne

    4. Re:Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're trying to power a subway, not the LHC.

    5. Re:Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by TheGeniusIsOut · · Score: 1

      Gravity is doing the work that generates the energy, the "user" is only providing a mass for gravity to work with. You still have to pick your feet up, but it is no more difficult to put it back down than on any other type of walking surface.

      --
      Ignorance is Bliss -- And the Opposite is True -- Genius is Madness
    6. Re:Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by McGruber · · Score: 2, Funny

      They should install this at Wal-Mart.

      To run the electric scooters?

    7. Re:Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      In order to generate the power, the surface has to give way a small amount.

      Now, take a walk down the sidewalk for 100 meters, then walk through soft sand for 100 meters and tell me which burned more energy. Yes, this example is on the extreme side, but it does illustrate the issue.

      TANSTAAFL

    8. Re:Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Normally the floor has to absorb the energy of a foot falling anyway. This could be just taking advantage of that - A bit like regenerative braking uses the energy using energy that would normally be spent as heat.

      Or it may not. I have no idea about the maths behind it. Just pointing out that sometimes there is free-ish energy.

    9. Re:Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by adrianwn · · Score: 1

      Just pointing out that sometimes there is free-ish energy.

      Not "free", rather "already paid for".

    10. Re:Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by manekineko2 · · Score: 1

      Is that necessarily true? It obviously would be if you assumed there is no energy lost during normal walking, but clearly that is not true. If it's just recovering some of the energy lost as we throw our feet into the ground so we can turn around their momentum, it might not be any harder.

      If I had to guess, I might think this might actually make it slightly easier to walk, if it's like walking on springy ground. For instance, thinking about it now in my head, I think it's less tiring to walk wearing a pair of shoes with air soles than barefoot. Might this be a similar case?

    11. Re:Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by leenks · · Score: 1

      Free as in beer? :-)

    12. Re:Not Just Theft of Services, Theft of Calories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point!

      They should bill it as a weight loss program and charge a monthly fee.

  6. Deja Vu, circa 2002? by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is this a totally independent outbreak of imbecility, or is it related to the SD article from ~2002?

    This piezoelectric idea is never going to recover the initial cost of construction and installation.

    To generate real amounts of power at near zero cost, just let the people walk up the escalator and harness the power of the steps going backwards.

    1. Re:Deja Vu, circa 2002? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Because you can only have true alternate energy sources when they cost less money than conventional energy sources?

      It couldn't be that they are the alternate energy sources because they are less efficient monetarily than "conventional" sources, could it? So what if it doesn't recover the monetary investment? Things would be a lot better off it PROFIT! wasn't the sole motivation behind any decision.

    2. Re:Deja Vu, circa 2002? by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > So what if it doesn't recover the monetary investment? Things would be a lot better off it PROFIT! wasn't the sole motivation behind any decision.

      How? It took energy to make those floor devices. If they don't ever generate as much energy as it took to make them, we've wasted energy. How are we better off wasting energy?

      Moreover if the things are really inefficient, then it means you're turning the people's food energy to nothing. It took a lot of energy and $$$ to feed those folks. Again, we're wasting expensive food and the energy it took to make and transport and cook that food.

    3. Re:Deja Vu, circa 2002? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      So how about we all just return to the state of lowest energy and call it a day then? Anything other than that would just be wasting energy.

    4. Re:Deja Vu, circa 2002? by SinGunner · · Score: 1
      I believe the energy from food was already going to be "wasted". This is like a simpler version of generating electricity through exercise equipment. The people were doing it anyways, so why not get something back?

      And if you've ever seen these things, they basically look like a mat on the ground that gets stepped on a million times per day. I can't imagine there's a complex, expensive mechanical system going on in there that cost a ton of money to create.

    5. Re:Deja Vu, circa 2002? by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      Ah, no, you don't get something for nothing. The mat must be receiving work, i.e. force times distance, so the walker must be supplying it. And how much work is that? Assume 130 pounds and one tenth of an inch for one second, that's 1/40th of a horsepower, or about 20 watts. If someone is stepping on it every second, that's 2 watts average. Piezoelectrics are not too efficient, say 5%, so we have 0.1 watts electric. If electricity costs 10 cents a kilowatt-hour, the mat is generating about nine cents of electricity a year. Even if the mat cost $2 to make and install, it does not even pay the interest.

    6. Re:Deja Vu, circa 2002? by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      The recovered energy would partly come from the wasted energy of people slapping their feet against the floor. Currently, there is a lot of energy being dissipated in shoe soles and the lower leg. The widespread use of padded shoe soles (i.e. running shoes) demonstrates that there is some extra energy that needs to be dissipated somewhere, for the comfort of the pedestrian.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    7. Re:Deja Vu, circa 2002? by SinGunner · · Score: 1

      Would doubling your "tenth of an inch" double the output? 1/10th of an inch seems rather conservative. Based on experience, I'd say it's closer to 1/4 or 1/2 an inch. And since they're running their machines off this, I have to question your math in its entirety.

    8. Re:Deja Vu, circa 2002? by c4colorado · · Score: 1

      There is another point to be made here. Let's say the cost of this "mat" is $2000 USD and it produces 1mw per footstep (purely examples to illustrate a point, I don't know the cost or the energy-generating potential per impact).

      If I were to install this in my entryway and I estimate about 50 footsteps on this mat on average (probably high but makes the math easy), at $0.032 USD per KWh it would take 197,129 years to pay for that $2000 mat.

      However, if you consider a subway station would have millions of foot impacts per day that number comes down quickly. For example 1 million footsteps per day makes it under 10 years for ROI on the theoretical system.

      The efficiency of this system, and therefore the ROI on the system is directly proportional to the scale of the installation and the amount of usage.

      (I know my calculations are not rigorous, but then again I'm pulling all of the numbers out of .. uh .. let's say thin air. I'd like to see the "real" numbers on this, as it would be interesting to see what the actual usage requirements would be to make it profitable. I'm guessing the main terminal would have enough foot traffic to warrant such a system while some of the smaller ones may not have the traffic to support the initial cost.}

    9. Re:Deja Vu, circa 2002? by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      If you look at their display, it's showing about 3600 watt-seconds. And they don't have any more digits on the display, so they can only go up to 9999 watt-seconds.

          Now do a teensy bit of unit math, and reckon there are 3.6 million watt-seconds in a kilowatt hour.

        Now if electricity costs ten cents a kilowatt-hour, a watt-second is worth 1/280000 of a cent.
      So that horn-blowing display is telling us they've generated a whole 1/100 of a cent. If my math is right.

    10. Re:Deja Vu, circa 2002? by SinGunner · · Score: 1

      To quote the article: "The total amount of floor-space will add up to around 25 square meters, and they expect to obtain over 1,400kw per day - more than enough to power their systems."

      The pictures say they are "jikenchuu", which means "in the middle of the experiment". And the article states they are improving their results.

      I just don't see how it could be a waste if they were really able to power their ticket-taking systems without outside electricity, especially if they can make the system durable enough to last a while.

    11. Re:Deja Vu, circa 2002? by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      The clue is in the phrase "1400kw per day". That is meaningless. Totally meaningless. "kw" if it means kilowatts, is a unit of how much work is being done per unit time. For instance one watt is one joule of work being done each second. Or as mechanical equivalent, two kilograms moved one meter in one second. So saying "1400kw per day" is equivalent of saying "1.4 million joules per second per day", which is physically meaningless.

      The numbers on the display jibe with my interpretation-- there is pitifully little energy being collected, way under a penny a month.
      And LCD displays can be made to run on very little current, they're basically tiny capacitors that just need to be charged-- microamps at most.

      And it's a waste, those piezoelectric panels cost hundreds of dollars. In a heated and lighted subway there is plenty of AC power available. There is no point in spending hundreds to thousands of dollars on this. It's a waste of resources.

  7. I can hear it now... by eqreed · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The ticket will cost 100 yen and 5 jumping jacks."

    1. Re:I can hear it now... by tsalmark · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think for a hundred yen you also have to high jump the gates at both ends of the trip. Note always make sure the gate has properly read your ticket before running through. the Machine does NOT have your safety in mind as at swings that bat out to stop you dead. No it didn't happen to me, it happen to a, erm, friend.

  8. Interesting by Eg0Death · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are forklifts driving back and forth on the production floor here at my place of work. If those 10,000 lb forklifts carrying 2,000 lb loads were driving over piezoelectric energy generating floors, how much energy could be harnessed? Certainly not enough to offset the cost in the short term, which is the only term my employer seems to comprehend.

    --
    Why is this thus? What is the reason for this thusness?
    1. Re:Interesting by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just tell them about all the energy savings and cartoon birds will start flying around their heads as a giant smile grows on their face.

    2. Re:Interesting by gblackwo · · Score: 1

      There is nothing free about this energy, what you are proposing is a very elaborate and inefficient way of converting (propane, diesel, electricity or whatever your forklifts run on) into electricity.

      Every time a forklift runs onto the tile, the tile depresses slightly which causes the work, however the forklift will then have to compensate by climbing off the depressed tile. Where else do you think this energy is coming from?

    3. Re:Interesting by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      how much energy could be harnessed? Certainly not enough to offset the cost in the short term

      Or any term. Unless the forklift fuel is free.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    4. Re:Interesting by Eg0Death · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The forklifts are driving hither and yon and burning fuel regardless of the presence of these tiles. Having the tiles in high traffic locations would generate some electricity.

      The limited amount of information I've read regarding these tiles has not mentioned the distance they must travel for electricity to be generated. However, since they have to operate without impeding foot traffic, I suspect the distance is minimal. Certainly no more than an inch. If the tile was 1 inch above the level of the floor when uncompressed and dropped to that level when compressed, I suspect that something weighing 10,000 - 12,000 lbs with 20+ inch tires would have enough momentum to depress the tile with a very minimal increase in fuel consumption. Taking into consideration the miserable condition of the floors in the plant and the surrounding exterior locations of forklift travel, 1 inch is of little significance.

      --
      Why is this thus? What is the reason for this thusness?
    5. Re:Interesting by Eg0Death · · Score: 1

      Although I have no real data to back it up, I sincerely doubt that presence of these tiles would result in a significant increase in fuel consumption. See the reply to hansamurai above.

      --
      Why is this thus? What is the reason for this thusness?
    6. Re:Interesting by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. The issue is the amount of compression. If it's on the molecular scale, you like *do* get something resembling free energy.

      The extra 'work' you mention comes when the wheel rolls off of a compressed tile and 'up' onto the next non-compressed tile. If that height is negligible compared to the rolling resistance it would present, it would seem to give you energy with little in the way of 'cost'.

      Of course I don't know details about this technology (mostly because i didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night I'm guessing) so I might be wildly wrong, but I think that's what the GP was probably angling at.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    7. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics thank you very much.

    8. Re:Interesting by PotatoFarmer · · Score: 1

      Although I have no real data to back it up, I sincerely doubt that presence of these tiles would result in a significant increase in fuel consumption. See the reply to hansamurai above.

      The point here is that the increase in fuel consumption is, at best, exactly equal to the amount of energy generated by the tiles. This is basic thermodynamics. Considering that this isn't an ideal system (energy loss due to heat), it's never going to generate close to what it consumes.

      Personally, if these devices were economical enough to justify their installation in human-powered applications, I'd be fine with it. Most of the people in my neck of the woods could stand to burn the extra calories. If, however, you're talking about fueling them with something other than human muscle it's just a losing proposition all around.

    9. Re:Interesting by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If you're extracting energy from it, it MUST require energy to be input.

      By using a low friction material for the tiles it might be possible to reduce friction to offset the energy stolen by the piezo devices, but in that case you might as well just replace your floor surface with the low friction material without the piezos for even better efficiency.

      There is no free energy.

    10. Re:Interesting by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      agreed, but lets say that compressing a solid caused it to:

      a) generate electricty which in turn
      b) generates heat

      Vent the heat to the atmosphere and you've converted your mechanical into electrical using only the already existing forces. While it isn't 'free' by energy standards, it is 'free' in terms of the inputs of the closed system you're talking about.

      My brain wants to equate it with regenerative braking in hybrid cars. You have the extra 10% (total guess) weight of the regen system to lower your mileage a bit, but you get the regenerative force of 100% vehicle weight in return. Not 'free' obviously, but in this case you're recouping some of the energy you converted from fuel into kinetic potential energy back into electrical. There's a small payment for a larger return.

      Like I said though it all depends on how much energy is required to roll from one tile to the next, that's the 'cost'. If it's not significantly lower than the energy generated it obviously doesn't work.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    11. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but there is wasted energy. Currently energy is going from the forklift into the tile, then from the tile into the foundation, and from the foundation into the ground, dissipating as it goes.

      Maybe a bit of that could be dissipated into the piezos.

      Not that it makes any sense at all, since the production of these things will cost more energy than they'd produce. But I'm just saying, it's not a net zero since we're collecting otherwise wasted energy.

  9. Re:What a good idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're wrong, and to prove it, I'll make a supposition with no factual basis whatsoever: I would bet that the cost to the environment in producing these special devices will be far less than the coal that would have to be fed into a coal power plant to produce the same amount of power.

  10. They must run elephants through every hour by hardie · · Score: 1

    The article talks about a 25 square meter area producing 1400 kW per day.

    This sounds highly unlikely.

    Steve

    1. Re:They must run elephants through every hour by gblackwo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they mean 1400 KJ/day

    2. Re:They must run elephants through every hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Americans.

    3. Re:They must run elephants through every hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They do.

      http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20081204/162357/

    4. Re:They must run elephants through every hour by fifirebel · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article talks about a 25 square meter area producing 1400 kW per day.

      Meep.

      You lose.

      Watts are not an energy unit.

      1. It could be 1.4 MWh per day, which is 5.04 GJ per day, which averages to 58.3 kW constant power.
      2. Or 1.4 MW averaged over a day (now that's ridiculous).
      3. Or 1.4 MJ per day, that averages to 16W constant power, what's ridiculously low.

      My bets are on #1 (58.3 kW averaged).

      To give an idea on how much power this is, it is 530 Amps under 110 V. A typical house has a 100 A circuit. So it's generating about the maximum allowed power usage for a little bit over 5 houses.

      For the computer-savvy^Wobsessed /. crowd, that's about 200 medium size servers.

    5. Re:They must run elephants through every hour by hardie · · Score: 1

      Well, that *is* what the article says. Me thinks the article loses.

    6. Re:They must run elephants through every hour by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Not to mention 1400 kW is a rate of energy, not an amount. When will journalists at least realize that units are kind of important to understanding what they are talking about? I assume that means 1400 kWh, but it could just as well mean they generate 1400 kW on average throughout the day (which would be a pretty impressive chunk of money).

      Even assuming 1400 kWh, I can't imagine that number is correct. That's actually a lot of power, and, if true, this system might actually make sense in certain high traffic situations.

    7. Re:They must run elephants through every hour by fifirebel · · Score: 1
      You're right.

      Sorry for labeling you a loser ;-)

  11. Harvesting stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if only they could somehow use this system to harvest the stupidity and mismanagement of the New York City subway system. But seriously this could probably have good use in a lot of the manhattan subway stations where the MTA seems to pride itself making the most uncomfortable ride ever. Maybe they could save on energy costs which is one of their many excuses for being over budget again despite getting fare money from the most populated city in the US, getting a piece of the high property taxes from New York City, and getting some more money funneled in from the State.

  12. Awesome. by XTrollX · · Score: 0

    It would be amazing if the MTA would invest in this kind of technology and provide it to NYC. Tokyo is on it's way to an almost 100% green rail-system. The piezoelectric system combined with the Maglev trains that were installed in 2003 is making Tokyo's railways emissions free and almost electricity free. The only electricity now being used is going towards powering the magnetic rails. Looks great! ~Troll~

    1. Re:Awesome. by gujo-odori · · Score: 2, Informative

      Say what?! Japan has only one commercial maglev line in the whole country, which runs in Aichi-ken. It's only about 6 or 7 miles long IIRC, and has a top speed of about 65 - 70 MPH. It went into service n 2005. JR has some on their test track, though, and they are really fast. But it was just last year that JR announced they plan to start commercial maglev shinkansen service in 2025. They don't have it now because, well, the maglev rail lines haven't even been built yet. China has a maglev line running between Shanghai and somewhere; Korea also has a single maglev line, and AFAIK those are the only commercial service maglevs in Asia. Everything else is on a test track.

      Also, electric != emissions-free. All passenger rail in Tokyo is electric, but that doesn't make it emissions-free. That electricity still has to be generated, and not all of it comes from nuclear plants (although much of it does; Japan probably has the highest percentage of nuclear power in the world). The emissions from an electric train are produced at the point of power generation, but they're still produced. Is that better than diesel engines on the train? Probably, but it's not emissions-free. This goes for electric cars as well. Many people mistakenly state that electric vehicles are non-polluting, but they are just non-polluting at the place where they are being driven.

      Finally, maglev trains do consume quite a bit of power; it's not like making it maglev will suddenly make it an energy sipper. Sure, you gain some efficiencies from doing away with rolling friction, but you add electromagnetic resistance, and because maglev trains in development are aimed at being faster than existing rolling stock (the trains at JR's test track in Yamanashi-ken are way faster than any shinkansen currently in service), there will be increased air resistance. Expect maglev to be somewhat more power efficient than wheeled trains, but it's not going to be a power panacea.

    2. Re:Awesome. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait wait...I have the solution!

      Install some of the piezo-things under the train and have the train roll over the tiles, creating the energy to levitate it!!!

      Brilliant! ;-)

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  13. ALL THE STUPID ELECTRICTY JOKES GO HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You would be shocked by the potential of this technology. It has the capacity to replace large amounts of electrical expenses. Much like you, I'd be revolted if they did not make the best use of this technology!

    1. Re:ALL THE STUPID ELECTRICTY JOKES GO HERE by Kagura · · Score: 2, Funny

      The crowds in Shinjuku are abuzz upon hearing this news, but it seems to have polarized Japan's greater populace.

    2. Re:ALL THE STUPID ELECTRICTY JOKES GO HERE by nschubach · · Score: 0

      My day is lightend by this experiment and electrified by the energy in the air.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:ALL THE STUPID ELECTRICTY JOKES GO HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the piece de resistance!

  14. Summary Error by hobotron · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The system will harvest the kinetic energy generated by crowds..."

    No, it will harness the POTENTIAL energy change in the compression of the floor plates by a distance D with force F. The energy lost by the person and gained by the floor (neglecting efficiency losses) would then be F * D.

    Bad summary, Bad

    --
    There is truth in humor.
    1. Re:Summary Error by thegnu · · Score: 1

      I only read your post because I thought you were abbreviating the F-word.

      Good point, though.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
  15. The most important question is of course..... by TheMadcapZ · · Score: 4, Funny

    How does it hold up against massive quantities of urine?

    1. Re:The most important question is of course..... by spidercoz · · Score: 4, Informative

      it's Japan, not New York

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    2. Re:The most important question is of course..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how does it stand up to young women being molested on it?

    3. Re:The most important question is of course..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rephrasing the question then:

      How does it hold up against massive quantities of bukkake-fest semen?

  16. Godzilla by OglinTatas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    just imagine how much energy can be harvested this way the next time Godzilla rampages! Energy independence, AND the project will pay for itself in about a 40 minute feature film. Of course, then you have to rebuild it and wait for the next rampage for the new project to pay off...

  17. Re:What a good idea! by Tisha_AH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just stewing this over in my brain I was astonished by the possibilities.

    Human activity follows a semi-diurnal cycle and in something like a subway station your peak generating capacity would be when masses of people are using the stations, let's say from 6 am to 9 am, 4 pm to 6 pm. Wherever this technology is applied you would need a certain level of foot traffic to make it cost effective.

    Imagine this on the floors of airline terminals, sports stadiums, very busy downtown areas (sidewalks in the New York business district). You could even apply this to very busy interstates or near toll plazas.

    The real stretch of imagination; think about building seawalls covered in a piezoelectric material where the constant wave action generates electricity. Even wind motion (variable winds, not constant winds where windmills are really the best solution) where you can generate electricity by the loading/unloading of force and strain through a piezoelectric mechanism.

    Getting the price-point down low enough can make this an excellent contributor to power generation worldwide. If they covered the grounds around Mecca they could generate megawatts of power during the Haj.

    --
    Tisha Hayes
  18. It might work, at first... by mbstone · · Score: 1

    At first, you won't notice the extra iota of compression made by your feet against the piezo-floor-plate. But next year there will be budget cuts, and some bureaucrat will crank up the device to make the floor plates just a little bit squishier to extract just a little bit more kinetic energy... a couple of budget cycles later, it'll be like Grand Central Station, covered in mud.

  19. Your answer ... by afxgrin · · Score: 1

    ...is found in the article, in this image.

  20. And? by SinGunner · · Score: 1

    They've had these things at the gates of Tokyo Station for years now. What's the news part of this? I don't even notice them when I walk across them anymore.

  21. Tokyo Station, nuthin -- redo Shinjuku! by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    If JR East really wants to generate some power, they should redo the floors in Shinjuku Station -- the place is bloody huge, and is a combined station for five different rail companies (JR East, Odakyu, and Keio railways, and Toei and Tokyo subways). Average daily foot traffic for fiscal 2007 (only people walking through ticket stiles -- not counting people just passing through on the trains, or other foot traffic like walkthroughs or same-company line transfers) came to 2,666,598 for the whole station, and 785,801 for just the JR East section (each rail company has it's own sections into which only ticketed travelers may enter), with this JR East figure alone making Shinjuku Station the most travelled in the world. By contrast, Tokyo Station only had 427,824 travellers as a whole, and only 396,152 for the JR East section, or 50.4% of the traffic in the Shinjuku JR East section.

    Data taken from the Japanese Wikipedia pages for the stations:
    http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%96%B0%E5%AE%BF%E9%A7%85#.E5.88.A9.E7.94.A8.E7.8A.B6.E6.B3.81 (Shinjuku)
    http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9D%B1%E4%BA%AC%E9%A7%85#.E5.88.A9.E7.94.A8.E7.8A.B6.E6.B3.81 (Tokyo)

    If they could get cooperation from the other rail companies and redo the whole of Shinjuku Station, I'd be interested how much electrical power they could get from over 2.5mn people walking through every frikkin day. I'd hazard they could power more than just the signs. :)

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  22. Travelling is tiring enough... by cwsulliv · · Score: 1

    How much more tiring will it be to walk on a squishy floor rather than on a rigid or resilient one?

  23. Mods by Auraiken · · Score: 1

    This should have been a funny... I can't believe this happened on slashdot.. :(

  24. Matrix anybody? by Darkk · · Score: 1

    Sounds awfully familiar when something is turning people into a "battery" for energy.

    I might as well open up a gym and hook up electric generators to the machines so it'll keep the place lit.

     

  25. Small quantitites by danimrich · · Score: 1

    Of course, this way of generating energy will only have a very tiny effect.

    In essence, these systems are stealing a bit of energy from the walking crowd.

    Let's assume the following: The system relies only on difference in potential energy. Say the engineers were smart and constructed an elevator that converts the potential energy of the passengers into electricity with close to 100% efficiency. For every 70kg passenger this would generate slightly under 2 watt-hours, assuming that the elevator covers a distance of 10 meters and does not take anyone upwards.
    That's nice, but it's a rather irrelevant quantity in comparison to what it takes to operate the whole system. At the current costs of energy and transport, my exemplary passenger would need to cover a vertical distance of over 50 kilometers(!) to produce an amount of energy that is of equivalent value to the price of one single subway ticket.

    --
    where's all that Karma?
  26. Who makes it? by BillX · · Score: 1

    I didn't see it in the article, but I would really like to know who makes a piezo generator that produces the kilowatts of power they are claiming. With the commercially-available piezo energy harvesters I develop for, a playing-card sized wafer ($50) generates not much more than 10mW under ideal conditions (continuous sinusoidal vibration from a lab shaker). Wouldn't I like to get me a few of theirs! (Goodbye epaper, hello giant LED matrix...)

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.