Slashdot Mirror
64-Bit Java For Linux
LWATCDR writes "First we got 64-bit Flash; then the beginnings of 64-bit Wine; now Sun is providing a 64-bit Java plugin. For most people there is nothing to hold you back from running 64-bit Linux."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
64-bit Slashdot still has a few kinks to work out.
I'm colorblind, you insensitive clod!
Someone has to be slower to load than the acrobat reader plugin.
How we know is more important than what we know.
For most people there is nothing to hold you back from running 64-bit Linux.
Except the fact that Microsoft Windows is superior in every aspect.
64.0 bits should be enough for anyone.
echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
obviously you need to reinstall... with 128-bits Linux...
"I think this line is mostly filler"
""First we got 64-bit Flash; then the beginnings of 64-bit Wine; now Sun is providing a 64-bit Java plugin. For most people there is nothing to hold you back from running 64-bit Linux."
Owning a 32 bit computer might be an issue.
Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
Someone has to be slower to load than the acrobat reader plugin.
Not even Java can take that prize.
Java Joke:
Knock Knock.
Who's there?
Java!
Adobe Joke:
Knock Knock.
Who's there?
Crash.
There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
Makes a change, most people around here are joke blind.
That's not really a properly-formed knock knock joke. How about:
Knock Knock.
Who's there?
...
...
...
...
Java!
Java who?
...
...
...
...
Java few minutes? 'Cause this might take a while.
I don't get it.
My Intel processor claims that 63.99 bits should be enough for everybody.
If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
Try C++, which seems to get much less attention than it should. It's undeniably faster than Java, but equally good at creating usable abstractions.