Microsoft Rushes Internet Explorer Patch
drquoz writes "Last week, it was reported that a critical security flaw was found in Internet Explorer. On Tuesday, experts were advising users not to use IE until a patch could be released. On Wednesday, Microsoft released the patch. An interesting quote from the article: 'Kandek suggests that Microsoft is at a disadvantage in updating Internet Explorer because its browser doesn't have a built-in update mechanism like other browser makers. Mozilla, for instance, just released Firefox 3.05 to Firefox users through its auto-update system.'"
Perhaps this is because Microsoft so tightly binds IE to the operating system
Not perhaps.
I believe the engineering term is "reap what you sow, bitches."
Can we patch FPers?
Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
Sorry...but, "huh?"
Tools-Windows update. Or it is updated automagically if you have auto updates turned on.
I did RTFA, but I still didn't understand that comment.
Clearly the article doesn't believe the microsoft line about IE being an integral, inseparable part of windows.
doesn't allow users the granularity of saying "yes, update my browser but no, leave the rest of my system alone
Indeed, you can't have it automatically update a critical browser flaw, but say 'no' to the 1673rd revision of "Windows Genuine Advantage".
[Insert pithy quote here]
Apple has resolved this issue. Now they try to install Safari in addition to Quicktime and Itunes.
It's harder to avoid than you seem to think. If you use Windows help to view .chm files, you're using IE. Usually they stay local, but many help files do include
links to web pages, and then you're out in the real world.
And for Slashdot readers... that's a no no..
You know, it's a little premature (and uncool) to refer to it as "Civil War I" until the second one actually starts. Give it a few years.
You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.