Slashdot Mirror


Watergate "Deep Throat" Mark Felt Dead At 95

Hugh Pickens writes "W. Mark Felt Sr., 95, associate director of the FBI during the Watergate scandal, better known as 'Deep Throat,' the most famous anonymous source in American history, died at his home in Santa Rosa, California. Felt secretly guided Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein to pursue the story of the 1972 break-in of the Democratic National Committee's headquarters at the Watergate office buildings, and later of the Nixon administration's campaign of spying and sabotage against its perceived political enemies. 'It's impossible to exaggerate how high the stakes were in Watergate,' wrote Felt in his 2006 book A G-Man's Life. 'We faced no simple burglary, but an assault on government institutions, an attack on the FBI's integrity, and unrelenting pressure to unravel one of the greatest political scandals in our nation's history.' No one knows exactly what prompted Felt to leak the information from the Watergate probe to the press. He was passed over for the post of FBI director after Hoover's death in 1972, a crushing career disappointment. 'People will debate for a long time whether I did the right thing by helping Woodward. The bottom line is that we did get the whole truth out, and isn't that what the FBI is supposed to do?'"

19 of 126 comments (clear)

  1. Mark Felt Dead at 95? by Kaell+Meynn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'd feel dead at 95 too, if I were not in really good health.

    1. Re:Mark Felt Dead at 95? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      He is survived by his wife, Ivana B. Felt.

  2. Answer's obvious. by mind21_98 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The FBI is supposed to get the whole truth out. Unfortunately, there are people who want to bring politics into enforcing the law, so we need checks and balances on the entire government. That's where the media comes in. Mark Felt did do the right thing, even though it was incredibly difficult for him at the time. RIP, Mark. (now, whether we'd have the balls to do that today, or the attention span to see it through, is another question entirely. I don't think we do, quite honestly, judging by the multiple scandals that have gone seemingly unpunished during the Bush administration.)

    1. Re:Answer's obvious. by WindowlessView · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The right thing isn't to go outside the business/government process.

      Nonsense, both in general and this specific case.

      The "process" in this case was blocked and corrupted from multiple angles. The Attorney General (John Mitchell) was involved in the original crimes. His replacement, Eliot Richardson, was fired in the Saturday Night Massacre along with the special prosecutor and others. It was later shown that the CIA, FBI, etc., all had elements participating in the crimes or cover up.

      Working within the system Felt would not have been any more effective than anyone else. Yes, like Richardson et.al. he could have taken a stand and been shoved aside or fired. And effectively silenced because he didn't have any specific evidence himself but merely the knowledge of where to point the investigation. He would have been a small part of a 3 day news cycle and the Nixon gang might well have gotten away with it.

      Going outside the system was precisely the right thing to do, arguably the only thing available to him. Even so, if it weren't for a rather unique group of people at the Washington Post it might not have had anymore success than working inside the system. One only wished the NY Times had such guts with the illegal wiretapping information instead of sitting on it for a year.

      The business/governmental "process" only works when there are people of integrity involved. When those people, like Nixon, Bush, Enron, Countrywide, etc., are up to eyeballs in the crime the "process" is nothing more than convenient choke points to stop the truth from getting out.

      --
      Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
  3. Thanks Slashdot by kentrel · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was JUST about to sit down and watch Thursday's breaking news that I had on TiVo, and now you've just ruined it for me.

  4. Mark Felt: The Black Bag Man? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's a good thing Mark Felf was around, without "Deep Throat", the full extent of Nixon's crimes may never have come out.

    Yet Felt was not strictly against "black bag jobs" like the Watergate break-in:

    While Watergate was seething, Mr. Felt authorized nine illegal break-ins at the homes of friends and relatives of members of the Weather Underground, a violent left-wing splinter group. The people he chose as targets had committed no crimes. The F.B.I. had no search warrants. He later said he ordered the break-ins because national security required it.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/washington/19felt.html?scp=1&sq=mark%20felt&st=cse

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  5. Media AI source code by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 4, Funny

    if(politician.party=="republican") {
          attack(politician);
    } else if(politician.party=="democrat") {
          fellate(politician);
    } else {
          ignore(politician);
    }

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    1. Re:Media AI source code by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 4, Funny

      } else {
      ignore(politician);
      }

      Good for you, accounting for those rare, one-in-a-million occurrences.
      Huh. I can't get the non-breaking spaces to work.

    2. Re:Media AI source code by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's worth bearing in mind that Nixon's predecessor was objectively far worse than him, namely LBJ.

      Starting and then fighting the Vietnam war badly, deliberately falsifying the Gulf of Tonkin incident (whatever about Bush, I think he genuinely believed his pretext, that Iraqi WMDs existed), ordering the USS Liberty to not be defended when it was under attack and then falsifying details of the attack later (probably the most spineless act in US military history).

      Aside from that, there's the personal - forcing aides to talk to him while he was talking a dump, laughing at the dead body of JFK, etc..

      A truly odious and terrible president.

      --
      Azural - instrumentals
    3. Re:Media AI source code by Phantom+of+the+Opera · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's worth bearing in mind that Nixon's predecessor was objectively far worse than him, namely LBJ.

      Starting and then fighting the Vietnam war badly, deliberately falsifying the Gulf of Tonkin incident (whatever about Bush, I think he genuinely believed his pretext, that Iraqi WMDs existed), ordering the USS Liberty to not be defended when it was under attack and then falsifying details of the attack later (probably the most spineless act in US military history).

      Aside from that, there's the personal - forcing aides to talk to him while he was talking a dump, laughing at the dead body of JFK, etc..

      A truly odious and terrible president.

      Sure, those are terrible things.

      Breaking the oath of office and using the power of the Presidency illegally in order to retain power is far more cancerous and treasonous. That was Nixon's big crime.

    4. Re:Media AI source code by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Only if we are going back to a Roman Citizen type culture where freedom and democracy is important for people who are in, but absolutely forbidden for people that are 'out' (in this case, the Vietnamese).

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    5. Re:Media AI source code by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, maybe the 60,000 Americans who died pointlessly because of LBJ would disagree.

      I'd wager the 1.5 million Vietnamese who did likewise would, also.

      And maybe congress would think that being deliberately misled about a false enemy attack in order to start said war would constitute the president "breaking the seal of office".

      --
      Azural - instrumentals
    6. Re:Media AI source code by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 4, Funny

      #include "clinton.inc"

      It provides a public interface to the fellate() function, making it compatible with the politician class. Unfortunately it randomly leaves behind objects of class blue_dress in memory.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
  6. Materials on Watergate by Rinisari · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you don't know much about Watergate, I suggest hitting up Watergate on Wikipedia, then considering acquiring a copy of Woodward and Bernstein's All the President's Men. Those two reporters were the ones two interacted with Deep Throat, named for a 70s porn.

    The 1976 Redford/Hoffman movie version of the book All the President's Men is the definitive story in video format.

    Emery's Watergate is another arguably excellent book on the matter.

    Avoid the new "Frost/Nixon" film--it's history ambiguous and largely inaccurate; it's a Hollywood version of the story with excellent acting. Instead, watch the original interviews.

  7. that was a recent change. by pohl · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the SVN ChangeLog...

    2008-11-05 08:35  cabal_hacker

        * Media/src/com/murdock/ruppert/policy/Spin.java: Thank god we don't
              have to fellate that warmongering dunce anymore.  Reversing parties.

    --

    The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

  8. Felt's Revenge for Not Getting Promoted by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mark Felt disclosed to Woodward and Bernstein what he thought would hurt Nixon, because Nixon had passed over Felt (#2 at FBI when Hoover finally died) in favor of a Nixon crony, an "outsider", to run the FBI instead of promoting Felt.

    I'm glad he did. But I don't admire or respect Felt for it. Because Felt could have disclosed any of that stuff (or more that he surely knew) to Woodward and Bernstein, or many other journalists, well before he had reasons of personal revenge. Which might have prevented Nixon from being reelected in 1972, instead of a landslide followed by an aborted impeachment that has left this country in Constitutional crisis through today, worse every time around the cycle.

    I'm not glad he's dead, either. I wish he had spilled more, about other Nixon cronies (like Rumsfeld and Cheney), and he might have done so once the Bush era was finally safely over, and those other criminals were as "retired" as he was. But evidently there wasn't enough personal gain in that kind of disclosure, so Felt never gave it. And now he never will.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  9. Oh please, he was Hoover's #2 by unassimilatible · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To portray Felt as some heroic whistle-blower is nonsense. For one, Felt hid in the shadows for 30 years, until he was senile and his daughter pulled him into the daylight to capitalize on his fame. Heroes put themselves at personal risk for a higher cause. Felt hid to protect his reputation among his FBI cronies (think cigarette-smoking man types).

    More importantly, he was J. Edgar Hoover's #2 at a time when the FBI was wiretapping MLK and John Lennon - and presidents. Yes, there is a reason that Hoover stayed as FBI director, a huge plum appointment for any president, for 48 friggin years. Hoover blackmailed presidents, and everyone else he could wiretap and burglarize. You think his #2 wasn't in on that?

    When Hoover died, Nixon did the right thing, what any of the 44 presidents would have done, cleaned house and got the Hoover cronies the hell out of there. And what did Felt do once he didn't get the director job? He did exactly what every president for 48 years was afraid of about Hoover - Felt released dirt on Nixon.

    Say what you want about Nixon, but Hoover was the antithesis of a democracy, an unelected guy who abused his power and blackmailed presidents to stay in office for half a century. Appointing Felt to replace him would have been, in retrospect, politically expedient. Felt thought he was entitled to the job and brought Nixon down for it. To suggest that Felt, the ultimate black-bag guy, was appalled at Nixon's shenanigans, when Hoover freaking invented it, is like saying Linsday Lohan is offended by Paris Hilton's public tramp behavior. Ludicrous!

    It is interesting that most news reports do not talk about Felt's illegal wiretapping of the Weather Underground (not that I have sympathy for that domestic terror group, but I am not running around claiming to be some civil liberties hero), or they mention it at the very end of the story like AP did.

    God knows all of the shit Hoover pulled. Maybe someday it will all come to light. It would make a great movie, but would probably have to be a mini-series or TV show on HBO, as it would likely be impossible to chronicle in 2 hours.

    And they named the FBI building after the sumbitch.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  10. No, ATPM gets a lot wrong by unassimilatible · · Score: 4, Informative

    You want to read about Watergate, read G. Gordon Liddy's biography, since he planned and executed Watergate. Then Read Stephen Ambrose's Nixon biography (the third one). Ambrose is the only one who gives a reason why Nixon would want to wiretap Larry O'Brien, not that I am convinced Nixon knew in advance (none of the principles involved have ever claimed this). Silent Coup is an incredibly detailed chronicle of Watergate, but I disagree with its conclusions, other than John Dean was a little rat (Dean was the president's lawyer while working as an FBI informant). Never trust a word that comes out of Dean's mouth.

    You'd also want to read Bob Haldeman's and John Erlichman's biographies.

    ATPM gets a lot wrong. The bottom line is Nixon wasn't brought down by Woodward and Bernstein, they just kept up the heat.

    Nixon was brought down by a guy named Alexander Butterfield announcing to the Senate Watergate Committee that Nixon taped his conversations, which led to the smoking gun tape about Nixon telling the FBI that Watergate was a CIA operation, back-off. Nixon scuttled that idea the next day, but that tape is what brought him down, not W&B. Once Nixon finally released the tapes, that particular tape is what turned Barry Goldwater to support impeachment, and Nixon's goose was cooked. After Nixon heard he lost Goldwater, he turned to his SecState Al Haig and said, "Well, there goes the presidency, Al."

    BTW, when Haig dies, I'm betting he was a Woodward source too. Haig, when NSA for Nixon, was given his military briefings by a young Naval Intelligence officer named Bob Woodward. To this day, Woodward will not talk about those briefings.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  11. Re:Media AI source code - All presidents do it... by Wordsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't stand Bush and think his presidency has been among the most dangerous in modern history, but there's no credible evidence he "let" 9/11" happen. There's evidence he treated the threat too lightly, but no real reason to believe he had specific knowledge of what would happen and chose to look the other way. What not-so-credible evidence has been presented by conspiracy theorists has been debunked to high heaven.

    Hate him on the indisputable merits. It's easier.