Slashdot Mirror


Security Flaws In Aussie Net Filter Exposed

Faldo writes "There's a three-part interview with a computer security expert on BanThisURL that goes into the flaws in the Aussie net filtering scheme. In addition to SSH tunnels and proxies, more worrying problems like trojaning the boxes to set up man in the middle attacks (which the interviewee has done in his lab), cross site scripting and the Australian blacklist leaking are all discussed. Worrying and relevant, especially since Thailand's blacklist has just been leaked."

9 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. But What About The Children/Terrorists/Etc. by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Australian government seems to have gone pretty crazy over this thing, and is taking one of the classic paths when meeting resistance; that is to make the plan even bolder and more sweeping. There seems no recognition of the fact that this won't do a damned thing to prevent the production and distribution of child pornography, but will cause no end of problems for legitimate users. But this government clearly feels it's back is against the wall, and rather than simply taking the more sensible path and admitting that filtering is flawed, and in its own way dangerous, and that any attempt to screw with various P2P and secure protocols is going to real harm to legitimate users, is basically saying "We know better than the ISPs and technical experts."

    Politics tends to attract the insanely vain, but these guys are way out to lunch. I have no idea who their technical advisers are, but either these guys are morons or simply being paid to tell the government what it wants to here.

    But as anyone who has dealt with any kind of Internet security can tell you, it's always a game of catch-up. Whether it's viruses, root kits, DRM, firewalls, and so on, there's always someone willing, for good or ill, to crack systems, and believe me, if they actually go through with this nonsense, the desire to crack the filters, and more dangerous and delerious attempts to bust encryption and P2P is simply going to be met with better innovations to overcome them.

    But it does go to show you that the intellectual tyrannies are not simply the product of political tyrannies, but any government so sure in its own righteousness can play the part of the tyrant, simply by repeating the mantra "it's for their own good".

    The Enlightenment has died in Australia, and it's sad that the people aren't marching on Adelaide demanding the government's resignation and Rudd's forced expulsion. Western Civilization has lost its balls. We've fought world wars, sacrificed our young on countless battlefields, beat back the Communists by even the most questionable means, for what? So some religious nut can make decrees as to what law-abiding citizens of a so-called free country can view on the Internet?

    What a sad, fearful, pathetic lot the West has become.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:But What About The Children/Terrorists/Etc. by Kalriath · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Enlightenment has died in Australia, and it's sad that the people aren't marching on Adelaide demanding the government's resignation and Rudd's forced expulsion.

      Being Australians, they probably are. They'll find it pretty ineffective though, considering the government is situated in the Capital - Canberra.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    2. Re:But What About The Children/Terrorists/Etc. by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Didn't he order the destruction of Earth?

      No, that was the psychiatrist association because they didn't want the meaning of life to become widespread knowledge and thus relieve people of their bread-winning anguish and angst. So they hired the Vogon constructor fleet to blow it up for them, under the pretense of clearing up the path of a hyperspace bypass.

  2. Re:It is completely ignorant to think... by flyingfsck · · Score: 5, Informative

    There were 3 identical ships built (Titanic, Olympic, Britannic). Only one suffered from bad rivets.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  3. Re:It is completely ignorant to think... by computersareevil · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Titanic was an example of what should be called Cockyisms. (The beliefe that one is better or their product is better than it truly is.) in this case, Unsinkable...and we all know how THAT turned out!

    There already is a word: Hubris

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. Re:It is completely ignorant to think... by Nimey · · Score: 2, Informative

    It didn't help that Britannic struck a mine in 1916. Olympic served for 24 years, until 1935; she appears to have been withdrawn because the owners wanted to spend money on newer ships.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  6. Re:It is completely ignorant to think... by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also, only one suffered from iceberg collision.

    That's true. Britannic, which was launched as a hospital ship due to WWI, sunk after striking a mine. Olympic is the only one which lasted through the 1910s.

  7. Re:It is completely ignorant to think... by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also, only one suffered from a Celine Dion soundtrack.

    Wandering well off-topic, though, the 1997 film Titanic had a James Horner soundtrack, and Celine Dion had vocals on exactly one song on it.