Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

30 Years of Star Wars Technology

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on from the everything-i-need-to-know-i-learned-from-star-wars dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Earlier this month, Computerworld Australia checked out the exhibition of 30 years of Star Wars history at Sydney's Powerhouse museum. They also have a pictorial look at what's on display: one of the largest collections of Star Wars memorabilia combined with real-life examples of how such technology is being applied for business and social advancement."

9 of 146 comments (clear)

  1. sorry to be pedantic but... by owlnation · · Score: 4, Informative

    It hasn't been 30 years. It's been 31. The movie was released on 25th May 1977 in the US, and 27th October 1977 in Australia.

  2. Phasers are for sissies... by fruviad · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd rather have a sonic screwdriver any day of the week...

    1. Re:Phasers are for sissies... by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative
      Which is of course totally different from when spock reconfigures his tricorder...

      Star Trek makes three simplifying assumptions common to space opera: The FTL drive. Teleportation. Artificial Gravity.

      This draws viewers into your story quickly and cheaply without distractions.

      But once there reliance on technobabble is unforgivable. Firing off a gun within the tight confines of a spacecraft is lunatic.

      The energy weapon that can be powered down to disable but not kill - a sophisticated alternative to a Taser - makes perfect sense. This isn't something you have to explain to your audience, they can work it out by themselves.

  3. Re:You have not watched the movies, have you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Fail!

  4. Exhibit's Been Around for a While by darthservo · · Score: 2, Informative

    The "Star Wars: Where Science Meets Imagination" exhibit has been going on for quite some time (three years now). It was in Portland two years ago where I got some pics of the same exhibit.

    --

    Prove it.

  5. Re:Star Wars tech? by flosofl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Whoops, my bad. Lucas used Campbell's work to help create the first three. He didn't actually meet him until after Jedi was done.

    Still the main point stands.

    --
    "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
  6. Re:It's not sci-fi by fartrader · · Score: 2, Informative

    The whole genre of "Hard Science Fiction" rabidly disagrees with your sentiment. Try reading some more.

  7. Re:Star Wars tech? by Rick+Bentley · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... I disqualify Star Wars as sci-fi.

    Right, and I disqualify the Pope as a Catholic. Next I disqualify Obama as President Elect. Then I disqualify Earth as a planet and Claudia Schiffer as hot.

    Dude, for an entire generation Star Wars has defined Sci-Fi. Transporters on Star Trek were no better explained than hover-craft in Star Wars. Ray guns in War of the Worlds were no better explained than Light Sabers.

    Besides, before George Lucas was abducted by aliends and replaced with a replicant, he made the two best movies in the world (Empire Strikes Back and Star Wars, in order of greatness). In all good humor I hereby accuse you of blasphemy and disqualify you as a geek.

    --
    My favorite quote doesn't fit into 120 characters. Now no one will like me.
  8. Re:Han trolled first by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 3, Informative

    I call "idiot". The "sec" actually stands for arcsecond (an angular quantity), as in "the parallax of one arcsecond".

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.