Slashdot Mirror


Man Invents Alternative To Cooking Gas

An anonymous reader writes "Gazan resident Abed Ar-Rahman has revealed what he is claiming as an alternative to cooking gas that he developed since Israel has prevented deliveries of cooking gas to Gaza. He invented a device using chemical substances available in Gaza, which burn when mixed and brought into contact with oxygen. The first component is a metal filter that controls the interaction between 40% of the oxygen in the surrounding air, the inflammable substance and some other substances."

14 of 553 comments (clear)

  1. i smell bull... by iocat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From TFA:

    The first component is a metal filter that controls the interaction between 40% of the oxygen in the surrounding air, the inflammable substance and some other substances. He refused to reveal the exact substances used, fearing that they will not be allowed into the Gaza Strip.
    The second part of his invention is an electronic board that regulates the percentage of air and oxygen entering into the appliance, and the third component is an air pump using electrical power.
    The metal cannister could be refilled with the inflammable substance for no more than 40 NIS, which would make the home cooking device functional for up to 40 days, according to Farajallah.

    This would be neat if true -- a garbage disposal sized obvject providing 40 days of cooking gas for 40 NIS, but just reading alerts every single "perpetual motion" bullshit detector in my head -- the 40% figure, the secret ingredients, etc.

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    1. Re:i smell bull... by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This would be neat if true --

      I want to know how much oxygen is being consumed here, what toxins are being pumped out.

      Carbon Monoxide comes first to mind.

      I want to know what makes this unknown chemical mixture safe to use and store in the home.

      I want to know about clearances, surface temperatures. I want to know how easily you can tip this thing over. The risk of accidental burns and fires.

    2. Re:i smell bull... by Flavio · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the prevelence of 40 as a figure is what turns you off, note that semetic languages commonly use the number 40 as a non-literal figure meaning "many" and somewhere around that order of magnitude. However, translations commonly take this literally. Hence, the prevelence of "40 days" for Noah's ark, "40 years" in the desert, etc.

      Sufficiently accurate for a religious text, but not at all appropriate for a technical description.

  2. Re:WTF ISRAEL? by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess they're worried that they'll use that aluminum and convert a shanty town into a nuke refinery.

    Or a Quassam-rocket. One of those just killed two sisters aged 12 and 5.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  3. Re:Available in Gaza by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do you seriously think rocket fuel is readily available for everyone on Gaza? That everyone on Gaza fires rockets at Israelis?

    When 84% of Palestinians polled support the cold-blooded murder of unarmed Jewish students, you'll have to excuse me if I don't get much comfort from the fact that not all of them are launching rockets.

    As for the rest of your comment, you should certainly be modded "flamebait", which means I probably should be taking the time to respond to you.

    Then again, you should probably be modded "funny", since I always get a kick out of morons who run around yelling:

    "LOLz U wahtc FOX NOOZ, STFU STOOPID N00B!!!11!".

    It seems to be a good rule of thumb that the more loudly someone proclaims their disdain for FOX, the more likely they are to be a complete imbecile.

  4. Re:obvious answer by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok it's in poor taste admittedly but speaking as a jew even I found that hilarious.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  5. Re:Available in Gaza by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The current legitimately elected government of the Palestinian people have certain clues to their motives in their charter:

    "Today it is Palestine, tomorrow it will be one country or another. The Zionist plan is limitless. After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying." (article 32)

    "The time will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews (and kill them); until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: O Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him!" (article 7)

    The palestinians have made their motives towards the jews, all jews, absolutely clear ever since they got the hell out of dodge so that the muslim nations nearby (read: just about everything else over there) could push the jews into the sea.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  6. Re:Available in Gaza by Duhavid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Them". Say "some of 'them'", and you are on to something. Or do you maintain that each and every resident of Gaza all hate Israelis with all their breath? This article puts the lie to that notion, this one guy made a stove instead of a rocket.

    And Israel has a blockade where aluminum and cooking gas ( from the article ) are not allowed in or in low supply. This punishes the "live and let live" types far more than the violent militant ones, *and* gives backing to any "the Israelis hate you, see what they are doing to you?" kind of rhetoric. ( Yes, that blockade is in reaction to violence from Arabs against Israelis, but A: this will lead to hatred, not a limitation to violence and B: the violence is in reaction ( as they see it ) to the occupation of their lands ).

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  7. Re:obvious answer by wealthychef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, and America stole California from Mexico. History will not aid us in this question. The only way out is through dialog between parties who are committed to peace and freedom for all. Until that dialog begins, I think the "terrorism"/"oppression" (killing of innocents on both "sides") will continue.

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
  8. Re:WTF ISRAEL? by gbulmash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or a Quassam-rocket. One of those just killed two sisters aged 12 and 5.

    And you might notice those girls were Palestinians. It's sort of sad, because when I saw that article, my first thought was "ha ha, you dumbass terrorists screwed up and killed your own." Then right after it I felt guilty because no child's death should be a source of laughter. I'm just so sick and damn tired of these asswipe terrorists. When they kill their own by accident, it's hard not to gloat.

  9. Re:Available in Gaza by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Polls are all about timing and "location location location". I could use selective polling to find that 84% of Americans polled believe we should nuke France.

    It seems the better rule of thumb is that the more loudly someone proclaims their disdain for a group of people, the more likely they are to be complete imbeciles.

  10. Re:I Call Bullshit by Gerzel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Other than the Palestinians were in fact living there and the way political events turned out where in fact removed by force.

    I didn't say it was a particularly Good argument or correct. I did say that their side did have some valid reasoning.

  11. Re:WTF ISRAEL? by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And you might notice those girls were Palestinians.

    That's the point. Had I linked to any Israeli victim of terrorism, some dumbass would've come out from somewhere to debate, that it is all Israel's own fault, that they shouldn't have built the country in "somebody else's desert", or that they should've just died in the face of opposition, etc. This way, there is no such distraction.

    Or, at least, it is much harder to make — blaming the deaths of Palestinian girls from a Palestinian-fired rocket on Zionist Entity is, of course, possible — had it not been for the occupation, there would've been no need for rockets, so there — but stretches credulity beyond most people's BS-meters. I'm sure, this explanation is being offered inside Gaza and, maybe, West Bank, but it would not work elsewhere. Or so one hopes...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  12. Re:Available in Gaza by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When 84% of Palestinians polled [nytimes.com] support the cold-blooded murder of unarmed Jewish students,

    While I don't defend this opinion or behavior, I wonder what a comparable survey of Israelis would reveal.

    From my vantage point, there seems to be a lot of hotheadedness and vitriol all around the region. I don't think there are a lot of clean hands to be found.

    --
    I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.