Slashdot Mirror
What Carriers Don't Want You To Know About Texting
An anonymous reader writes "Randall Stross has just published a sobering article in The New York Times about how the four major US wireless carriers don't want anyone to know the actual cost structure of text message services to avoid public outrage over the doubling of a-la-carte per-message fees over the last three years. The truth is that text messages are 'stowaways' inside the control channel — bandwidth that is there whether it is used for texting or not — and 160 bytes per message is a tiny amount of data to store-and-forward over tower-to-tower landlines. In essence it costs carriers practically nothing to transmit even trillions of text messages. When text usage goes up, the carriers don't even have to install new infrastructure as long as it is proportional to voice usage. This makes me dream of the day when there is real competition in the wireless industry, not this gang-of-four oligopoly."
Of when we'll be nickled and dimed for text messages instead of quartered.
Next you'll be telling me that when you buy Coca-Cola, you're mostly just getting sugar and water!
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
Addictive behavior (texting) + Monopolistic cellular rule over addictive technology = obscene rates.
Even Larry Ellison is sitting back looking at his cellular bill going "Holy shit. And I thought I ripped people off."
But when it costs around the same amount as a minute of telephone call, I can't help wondering if they would be better off just making a short call...
But that would be, like, totally lame! (or ghey, or whatever it is those whippersnappers are saying these days)
Or during an grammar test.
So let me understand this: The wave of the future is that we'll be talking to our computers and typing on our phones? "Oh brave new world..."
I'm a Programmer. That's one level above Software Engineer and one level below Engineer.