Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The Slippery Legal Slope of Cartoon Porn

Posted by timothy on from the in-a-perfect-world-the-topic-would-not-arise dept.

BenFenner writes "Two out of the three Virginia judges involved with Dwight Whorley's case say cartoon images depicting sex acts with children are considered child pornography in the United States. Judge Paul V. Niemeyer noted the PROTECT Act of 2003, clearly states that 'it is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exists.'"

3 of 933 comments (clear)

  1. Not first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I don't look at child porn, but here's my story:

    I dropped a brown rope this morning the size of a small black child. At one point, I wasn't sure if I was taking a shit, or it the shit was taking me. And while I'm on that point, what's the deal with taking a shit? Shouldn't it be leaving a shit? I'm certainly not taking anything with me when I'm done.

    But back on topic, CP sucks ass

  2. Jews on the Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Kike Killing Machines kicking in to overdrive to exterminate or move Mudslum populations.

    I'm glad I don't have a county full of Jews next door to me.

  3. Re:Uhh, yes it does... by MadnessASAP · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Pornography is like wine, it gets better with age.

    --
    I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.