Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

UK Government To Outsource Data Snooping and Storage

Posted by timothy on from the avoid-conflict-of-interest dept.

bone_idol writes "The Guardian is reporting that the private sector will be asked to manage and run a communications database that will keep track of everyone's calls, emails, texts and internet use under a key option contained in a consultation paper to be published next month by Jacqui Smith, the home secretary. Also covered on the BBC."

7 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. Slippery slope by slugtastic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Senior Whitehall officials responsible for planning for a new database say there is a significant difference between having access to "communications data" - names and addresses of emails or telephone numbers, for example - and the actual contents of the communications. "We have been very clear that there are no plans for a database containing any content of emails, texts or conversations," the spokeswoman said.

    Pretty slip indeed.

  2. Re:Left on a train by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You wish given that UK government IT is all outsourced to private sector cowboys.

  3. Re:Left on a train by Yacoby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At least it's less lightly to be left on the train, if it's not in government hands.

    To be replaced by the private company selling it to the highest bidder?

  4. missed the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't be concerned at who is holding the data rather be concerned that the data is actually being collected.... (it's probably safer if the government isn't managing this anyway)

  5. Standard practice by Burnhard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm afraid this is standard practice. Outsourcing allows those in charge to blame the company or corporation for any theft or data loss, not government ministers.

  6. Jackboots Jacqui strikes again by damburger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What the hell is wrong with that woman? More to the point, what the hell is wrong with us? In any sane society a person like that would've been strung up from a lamppost a long time ago.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:Jackboots Jacqui strikes again by jimicus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What the hell is wrong with that woman? More to the point, what the hell is wrong with us? In any sane society a person like that would've been strung up from a lamppost a long time ago.

      She's the product of a party which is obsessed with micromanaging the citizens of the country. A party which got to power by ruthlessly instilling discipline within its own membership - in other words, "follow the party line to the letter or get out".

      Jack Straw and David Blunkett were almost as bad. Tony Blair has openly gone on record as saying that he doesn't consider the civil liberties argument against ID cards to be a particularly strong one.

      There is no fscking chance you'll find anyone in a remotely senior position within the current Labour party who's prepared to contradict the party line - particularly when the arguments presented in favour always boil down to "it will drastically reduce crime" - never something that's easy to argue against.