Slashdot Mirror


Oprah Sued For Infringing "Touch and Feel" Patent

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "Oprah Winfrey, or to be more precise, Oprah's Book Club, is being sued by the inventor/patent attorney Scott C. Harris for infringing upon his patent for 'Enhancing Touch and Feel on the Internet.' So Oprah's Book Club is now one of many people and entities being sued over this patent because they allow people to view part, but not all, of a book online before purchasing it. Mr. Harris also sued Google Books for infringing upon this patent. He actually was fired from his position as partner at Fish & Richardson for that, because Google is a client of that law firm and they had conflict of interest rules to uphold." It would be entertaining to see Oprah give very wide and mainstream publicity to the abuses enabled by our current patent system.

Update: 01/07 22:03 GMT by KD : The blog author Joe Mullin wrote to point out that the lawsuit was not filed by the inventor, Scott C. Harris, but rather by the shell company Illinois Computer Research, which seems to exist for the purpose of filing lawsuits based on this particular patent.

7 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. HAHAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He filed a frivolous law suit against....Oprah

    Like her or not, she is one of the most influential, and hence powerful, women on the planet.

    Of course she will fight it. She will also win. A mouse just picked a fight with a dragon.

     

    1. Re:HAHAHAHA by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, he's going to get roasted. I've been waiting for a patent troll to piss off the wrong person. Looks like that day has arrived. I guess I never thought it would be Oprah Winfrey though.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:HAHAHAHA by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not only Oprah's book club, but GOOGLE and SONY among others! This guy threw away a job with a law firm which had GOOGLE as a client!

    3. Re:HAHAHAHA by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's the thing though, I'm surprised more companies don't fight the trolls just to get a reputation among trolls that you're willing to go Thunderdome on them on occasion. Then they'll get the message to find someone else to mess with. The way I see it, the only reason patent trolling is profitable is because companies take a short term view of it and just settle, encouraging the prospect of a death by a thousand paper cuts.

  2. This is a title, since I must have one by greentshirt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Republicans always find a way to blame something on Democrats. Democrats always find a way to blame something on Republicans. Jews kill Arabs, Arabs kill Jews, people sue over patent infringement and lawyers are often assholes. Oprah seems too busy talking about getting fat again (and acting like it's some kind of horrible fate worse than death) to really do much publicizing of anything else. Tonight on Larry King live, he had 3 guests, Oprahs personal trainer, her spiritual adviser and some other guy, talk at length about GASP, OPRAH GETTING FAT. What the hell is wrong with our world, I don't know where to begin anymore.

  3. Re:Would she fight it? by muridae · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While she may be a media icon and corporate power in her own right, do you think her handlers are silly enough to let her counter attack this guy?

    She makes money from the media, and the media companies like the current patent and copyright laws. No one in that business is going to step forward and say 'the system is broken.' I hope she does, but I don't consider it very likely.

  4. Re:Prior Art? by Kalriath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the operating procedure of an Ice Cream shop.
    Yes, you can sample this. That too. That. That....
    But once you've had "enough" samples, you need to buy something.

    So, essentially, this patent is... "Something that's already happened for hundreds of years... on the internet"

    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".