Slashdot Mirror


Obama Recommends Delay In Digital TV Switch

gregg writes "Six weeks before the nation's television stations are scheduled to convert to digital transmission, the Obama administration is asking Congress to consider a delay. In the most significant sign to date of concern about the impending digital TV transition, the Obama transition team co-chair John Podesta said the government funds to support the change are 'woefully inadequate' and said that the digital switch date, Feb. 17, should be 'reconsidered and extended.'"

13 of 589 comments (clear)

  1. In Other Words... by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other words, the TV in the Oval Office isn't digital ready, and Obama doesn't want to miss American Idol.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  2. Re:Really that big deal? by wicka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I personally know one person who only uses their antenna, and they mostly watch DVDs anyway. I know some people are pretty bad off, but if you are that concerned about television you should be able to drop $40 on a converter box and not have the government pay for it.

  3. Too late!!! by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about all the people that have already bought equipment and are waiting for the stations to go full power with DV? What about all of the stations who have spent tons of money and time gearing up for the switch? In my city (Denver) we have a large new tower built for broadcasting HD, and part of the promise to the residents of the area was that after the switch happened the old towers (and associated problems with them broadcasting) would go away. If you let this linger another year or two they are kind of screwed.

    It's going to have to happen sometime, it might as well be now. Yes it sucks that the coupon program is underfunded (the web site you use to get coupons says they are out of money, so no more coupons are to be had), so make it a priority to get coupons out to those in rural areas much less likely to have cable or satellite already.

    You just can't decide at the last moment to pull the rug out from under what is a useful technical move forward. There has to be some continuity between what government says will happen and what actually happens, or all dissolves to chaos as government promises are further devalued.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  4. Re:Really that big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe its just me not being poor or actually liking cable, but is OTA TV really that pervasive these days?

    Yeah. I've been using OTA television for years. I'm not going to pay for crap I don't want.

    PBS is great and should continue to be able to deliver their service free of charge. Especially for the underprivileged.

    Don't get me wrong though, I think the change is a good one, but I think the converter boxes should be cheaper.

    What if radio changed and you had to purchase converters for every radio you own or they would be useless?

  5. Re:Really that big deal? by Ed_Pinkley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are several shows that are in HD and are not compressed. My dad is a digital cable subscriber but still switches to OTA when the show is available because cable has so many compression artifacts. I use OTA only but I am a hold-out. I just hate paying for programming that contains ads. I mean, isn't that what the ads are for?

    --
    "Long time listener, first time caller."
  6. Re:Converter coupons are already sold-out by Deltaspectre · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems to me that anyone that hasn't received a coupon by now is just going to wait until the next deadline. Wasn't analog supposed to go off the air in 2006? Enough delays already, time to just rip the bandaid off.

    --
    My UID is prime... is yours?
  7. They've had years by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The switch was already supposed to happen years ago, but they delayed things back then for the same reason. Should we delay forever and waste a huge amount of spectrum on an ancient broadcasting mechanism?

    I think the program is out of money because a lot of people who don't even need coupons are getting them - my guess is that probably half of the people at least do not understand that if they have cable they don't need a different box.

    There's still more than a month til the switch, time enough to sort out who really needs help and help them.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:They've had years by Chyeld · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you don't care what Verizon and AT&T are going to do with the spectrum once its free, then the solution to all of these problems was to do what the broadcasters and the viewers wanted in the first place: Nothing.

      Correction: What you really meant was "what the broadcasters wanted in the first place: Nothing.

      Because I can damn well tell you that I've wanted them to go digital since the change was first suggested the first time around and contrary to your assumption, I and many others like me are viewers.

      What you may have tried to mean was "what the broadcasters and the select group of people who still use VCR's, 8-Tracks, and still haven't bothered to get a converter box wanted". Which would also be true. And fuck them too.

      The spectrum is a public good. It should be used in the most effective way possible. Squatting on it with your 1940's analog technology because you don't want to spend the money on upgrading your equipment is ridiculous.

      The fact that the switch to digital is going to be able to smoosh ALL of the current broadcasters into a smaller spectrum, and they'll still be able to provide more channels at better resolution and quality should be telling you something.

      What are AT&T and Verizon going to do with their blocks? I don't care. Not because it's not important, but because it's not relevant to this discussion. They aren't the ones who are impeding the switch. They aren't the ones who drug their feet at every step in this conversion and who are now doing their best to whip up a grass roots scare campaign in a last minute effort to kill the project off. That's the broadcasters.

      And "responsibility that it goes smoothly"? What sort of kool-aid are you drinking over there? There hasn't be one change of this nature at this scale that has ever gone 'smoothly'. What the government has a responsibility to do is make sure the public resources we've entrusted them with the stewardship over are being used responsibly and effectively. Not hand hold a bunch of people who aren't going to give a shit ever, until the day everything actually stops working.

  8. Re:The American Public Will Never Learn by SydShamino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't even need my two [coupons], but picked them up anyways.

    Uhh, I think they ran out of money because they have allocated it all towards coupons that have been distributed, but haven't been redeemed or expired.

    In other words, you (and those like you) are part of the reason the program has run out of funding.

    ([coupons] assumed based on your post. If you meant [converter boxes], blowing taxpayer money and carbon dioxide for two pieces of junk to sit in your garage is equally foolish.)

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  9. Re:Really that big deal? by timeOday · · Score: 5, Informative
    I canceled my Comcast subscription when I found out how good OTA digital looks! Less compressed than digital cable or satellite.

    As for "the government paying for it," it's a small fraction of what they sold the reclaimed rf spectrum for.

  10. downgraded cable package by bsharma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another one here. After finding cable signals are worse than OTA, I downgraded cable package (I get discounted rate for bundling with Internet service any way). OTA digital has many interesting channels not on cable.

  11. Re:MOD parent Up by walt-sjc · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... Depending on where, exactly, you live of course. I get one broadcast station without a rooftop, or 5 with it. With analog, you can get a fuzzy picture, and nearly always get sound. With digital, you either get everything nearly perfectly, or you get nothing (nothing includes picture freezes and no audio.)

    The issue with digital is that people that used to get fuzzy but watchable stations now may get nothing.

    As for the converter box issue, the whole situation is partially caused by the fact that retailers were allowed to sell analog only sets if they were under a certain size... And larger sets the requirement was only recent (just a few years.)

    Also, converter boxes suck. Yet another remote to mess with (remember the users - those who can't handle programming an all-in-one.)

  12. Re: why socialised medicine sucks by Rozzin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which, by the way, is a succinct explanation of why socialized medicine sucks.

    Nah, they'll just cap what Doctors and Hospitals can charge for their services

    Just like the insurance-companies do now? What's the difference?

    --
    -rozzin.