Slashdot Mirror


Sony Teases 3D Playstation 3

Ars Technica has a brief report from CES, where Sony demonstrated the work they've done to bring 3D technology to the PS3. Quoting: "The idea was just to show the technology to people, to see if they would be interested in sitting at home, wearing a dorky set of black glasses, watching content in 3D. I couldn't pry details about how the 3D affect was achieved, or if the display could turn any source into 3D, but what's clear is that, glasses or no, the 3D affect is amazing. Sony showed off Wipeout HD running in true 3D, and I was ready to whip out my credit card right there. Frank and I both agreed, this was one of the best demos of 3D technology we have ever seen."

9 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hopeful by VinylRecords · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do we really need to move on from HDTV already?

    HDTV lag has yet to be solved, meaning tons of old game consoles must be played with input delay. HDTVs are also still too expensive for many people to afford. And once you buy an HDTV, you need something that outputs in HD, digital cable, a Blu-Ray machine, a PS3, those aren't cheap either.

    I still use my SDTV for gaming or watching DVDs as upscan converters or scalers look horrible on my HDTV. Because HDTV lag and upscaling are problems I am forced out of necessity to keep an SDTV around to play old video games without lag.

    I would rather see HDTVs perfected than a move to 3D.

  2. Ze goggles ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... they do something?

  3. Nice astroturfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At first I was only a little incredulous that someone loved Sony products so much, but then I saw the dead give-away:

    And of course the other big news blowing everyone away with the amazing things companies like EA are doing with Home make it staggering to think how incredible Home will be a year from now if it already is this good.

    You got greedy.

  4. Re:Hopeful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do we really need to move on from HDTV already?

    I'd say we haven't moved to HDTV at all.

    Not a lot of people I know actually have an HDTV. They are indeed still expensive, but more importantly, they don't really offer anything that people need or want. The difference between standard TV and HDTV is just not large enough for people to actually care about.

    HD-DVD is already dead and Blu-Ray doesn't seem to be doing all that well either. More evidence that people just don't care.

    What I'm hoping for is some actual innovation when it comes to television. On-demand streaming content, where I am no longer dependent of the exact time a tv show is aired, is a feature I'm missing. 3DTV sounds interesting to me as well. I'm certainly more likely to buy a new TV for those new features, than just to get crappy reality tv shows in a slightly higher resolution.

  5. Hang on... by ItsColdOverHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So is it just me or does this bear a striking resemblance to Nvidia's recent demo of shutter glasses combined with a 120Hz HDTV. To me the black glasses are a dead giveaway.

    As far as the "any source" part is concerned, let's not be silly here, you need concrete depth information. Sure our brains can infer this information but the sheer processing grunt required for a computer to do this means it will not be done any time soon at least not in realtime on full motion video.

    I am embarrassed for Ars Technica and more than a little disappointed.

  6. Re:BluRay's Amazing Success by Sebilrazen · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the top result returned from this search.

    --
    "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
  7. See Sony fail in 3 D I M E N S I O N S!! by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, anything that can get some more decent exclusives for Sony is a good thing. I bought my PS3 two years ago hoping for a lot. And so far I've used it mostly as a blu-ray player only. Metal Gear Solid 4 was good, as was Warhawk (Little Big Planet is supposedly cool too, but I haven't played it). But, other than that, it's mostly ports of games that end up looking and playing better on the cheaper Xbox 360 (and it doesn't help that I like Xbox Live and the Xbox controller better too). As a big fan of Second Life, I even had high hopes for Playstation Home. But even that ended up being a huge disappointment.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  8. Only Three? by scjohnno · · Score: 5, Funny

    In 2006 Ken Kutaragi proclaimed that with the PS3 came "4D gaming". It seems that his retirement from Sony in August 2007 has stripped the PS3 of 2 entire dimensions. Sony engineers have only now been able to recover one of the lost dimensions via the use of specialised goggles, and it is not clear if the PS3 will ever return to 4D status.

    When asked for comment, Mr Kutaragi noted that "Dimensions are but an illusion. Inside all of our souls is the true energy of dimensionality," before deep-throating the microphone and phasing back into the universe from whence he came.

  9. Re:Hopeful by courtarro · · Score: 4, Informative

    For LCD HDTVs, most of the input lag comes from all the processing hardware, not the LCD panel itself. Many TVs now come with a "game mode" that disables certain processing features to decrease lag time at the expense of noise reduction, or upscaling quality, or whatever.

    When I play Guitar Hero on my Sony LCD TV, I get about 60ms lag with the TV in its normal operating mode (as measured by GH's lag compensation feature). When I enable game mode on my TV, the lag effectively drops to zero. With game mode enable, many of the picture optimization features are not available, but that doesn't generally bother me since I usually disable them anyway.