Git Adoption Soaring; Are There Good Migration Strategies?
Got To Get Me A Git writes "Distributed version control systems (DVCS) seem to be the next big thing for open source software development. Many projects have already adopted a DVCS and many others are in the process of migrating. There are a lot of major advantages to using a DVCS, but the task of migrating from one system to another appears to be a formidable challenge. The Perl Foundation's recent switch to Git took over a year to execute. The GNOME project is planning its own migration strategy right now after discovering that a significant majority of the project's developers favor Git. Perhaps some of the projects that are working on transitions from other mainstream version control systems can pool their resources and collaborate to make some standardized tools and migration best practices documentation. Does such a thing already exist? Are any folks out there in the Slashsphere working on migrating their own project or company to a DVCS? I'd appreciate some feedback from other readers about what works and what doesn't."
In my day job we are migrating to something totally new...clear case.
(shit).
http://michaelsmith.id.au
In the UK and to a lesser extent here in Australia a "git" is akin to a moron.
And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
I have watched Linus talk about git on google tech talks, and am inspired to use it.
Unfortunately I think I need a tool like TortoiseSVN for git because I am a git.
bk is a far, FAR better VCS than anything else in the proprietary software world.
Visual Source Safe is surely the better option if you're developing using Visual Studio.
Squirrel!
You clearly have a very limited experience of real-world sarcasm.
Okay, fine, Subversion is only for lazy idiots and their coworkers.