Slashdot Mirror


The Origins of Pong

Gamasutra is running a feature about the origins and development of Pong, and how it helped to kick start the gaming industry. Quoting: "... games found their way onto even the earliest mainframes, starting the ongoing trend of implementing video games wherever a viable platform presented itself. The first known instance of an actual implementation was Alexander Douglas's 1952 creation of OXO (also known as Naughts and Crosses), a simple graphical single-player-versus-the-computer tic-tac-toe game on the EDSAC mainframe at the University of Cambridge. Although more proof of a concept than a compelling gameplay experience, OXO nevertheless set the precedent of using a computer to play games. The first known precursor of Pong debuted in 1958 on a visitors' day at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York. It was there that William Higinbotham and Robert Dvorak demonstrated Tennis for Two, a small analog computer game that used an oscilloscope for its display."

4 of 14 comments (clear)

  1. according to the discussion page by wjh31 · · Score: 3, Informative

    on the very article you linked to, even OXO was predated by a missile game in 1947 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_computer_and_video_games&oldid=50887750#The_beginning

    1. Re:according to the discussion page by cheesecake23 · · Score: 4, Funny

      on the very article you linked to, even OXO was predated by a missile game in 1947

      Exactly. And then, after endless draws in OXO, the computer finally suggested a nice game of chess.

  2. The origins? by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, I'm not one to RTFA, but wouldn't that be table tennis?

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  3. Noughts not Naughts by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The game is "noughts and crosses" in British English, and in that dialect "nought" means zero; (the circles in the game). "Naught" means "nothing" or "a failure". Variants of the same root, but used distinctly.