Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Tag, Smartphone-Scannable Barcodes

dhavleak writes "Microsoft Research has come up with Microsoft Tag: '...just aim your camera phone at a Tag and instantly access mobile content, videos, music, contact information, maps, social networks, promotions, and more. Nothing to type, no browsers to launch!' Device support is fairly extensive (iPhone, WinMo, BlackBerry and more), and tag scanning appears to work quickly and reliably from different distances and angles. Long Zheng has an overview on his site. The Tag is similar to a barcode, but has obvious visual differences — colored vs. black and white, and triangles vs. squares or lines. The technology looks interesting, but will it get the adoption necessary to be successful? What applications do you see for such technology?"

4 of 258 comments (clear)

  1. QR code? by MoFoQ · · Score: 5, Informative

    sounds like QR Code which is widely used in Japan (it's what the CueCat couldn't do in the states).

    Microsoft...always trying to re-invent the wheel and try to pass it on as a new invention.

  2. Microsoft reinvents again by solune · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've always wanted to turn my phone into a cue-cat!(R)

  3. 64-bit proprietary hashing? by infofarmer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is it just me, or do MS tags look like 50 positions of 4 colors, i.e. 100 bits, which, minus error correction, probably boils down to 64-80. It's obvious you need a server-based resolver to convert these few bytes into an URL. Now guess who manages the server and how much do they want to charge for each entry.

  4. Re:Hey everybody lets to it microsofts way by tonytnnt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not a new idea in any case, and the color one looks like shit, even though they can store more bits.

    Now that I think about it, wouldn't QR Code have a HUGE advantage in some print advertising because it's black and white vs. color? I mean, I know that Tag appears to fit into a 4 color process, but it just seems like a 1 color process would be more advantageous... or am I completely off base here?