Slashdot Mirror


Switching To Solar Power — Six Months Later

ThinSkin writes "Slashdot readers may remember an article regarding ExtremeTech's Loyd Case's experiences with solar power for the home after one month of usage. During that time six months ago, it sure seemed like a great deal, but the tables have turned significantly once winter approached. While it's no surprise solar power generation is expected to dwindle during the winter, Loyd compares solar power data of the last six months to determine if solar power is still worth the time and money."

4 of 591 comments (clear)

  1. Re:$400 a month? by dfdashh · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here's why, from his initial article:

    Our power usage is unusually high for a typical, four person nuclear family. A big part of that is because I have a PC lab and network in the basement. Both my wife and I work out of the house much of the time, with her time almost 100% in the home office. Plus, we have two teenage girls and a pretty beefy HDTV and home audio setup in the family room.

    --
    df -h /my/head
  2. Re:$400 a month? by drunkennewfiemidget · · Score: 5, Informative

    The house I currently live in was powered with solar panels here in Southern Ontario before I bought it. The guy who sold it to me took the panels with him. They did just fine at consolidating his hydro to the point where he was paying almost NOTHING to the power company. They're not worthless at all. A large investment that might take longer out here to recoup costs, but definitely not worthless.

  3. A sun-tracking system is better by msbmsb · · Score: 5, Informative

    MAKE:blog has some descriptions of some DIY sun-trackers to move the panel with the sun during the day.

  4. Shh... by conureman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't tell anyone, but there's a tab on the first page that's labeled "print". I don't get to wait for ads and pictures to load, but it has the text.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.