Slashdot Mirror


Networked Fridges 'Negotiate' Electricity Use

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers have developed a way to network household and commercial fridges together in a distributed peer-to-peer fashion that lets them 'negotiate' with each other on the best time to consume electricity. A retrofittable controller is attached to each fridge and then a temperature profile is built around the unit. The controller enables communication between other fridges on the network and also the power source. It enables fridges to work together to decide when to cool down, and thus consume power, based on how much surplus power will be available, and to anticipate power shortages and change their running schedules accordingly to use as little power as possible during these times."

45 of 217 comments (clear)

  1. Cold beer by pondermaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    My fridge better not negotiate its way out of cold beer at 7pm.

    1. Re:Cold beer by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fridge Skynet is evil. It might well happen.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Cold beer by Smivs · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fridges may be cold-blooded killers, but still need human assistance.

    3. Re:Cold beer by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      why not simply make higher efficiency fridges? I was able to convert a chest freezer into a fridge that uses about 1/4 the energy that the best performing energy star fridge can do. It works great.

      all they need to do is increase the insulation in current fridges and improve the door seals. that alone would make a HUGE improvement. Granted I get an added benefit from not having a door that empties the fridge of all it's cold air every time it's opened, but the biggest gains are from the seal and 6" of insulation all around it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Cold beer by Foolicious · · Score: 4, Funny

      My fridge better not negotiate its way out of cold beer at 7 AM.

      There -- fixed that for you.

      --
      Please don't use "umm" or "err" or "erm".
    5. Re:Cold beer by necro81 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Another measure that works well this time of year (in northern climes, anyway). Fill old bottles with tap water (plastic soda or water bottles works well). Don't fill them all the way, perhaps about 80%, then squeeze out the air and cap them.

      Set them outside overnight and allow them to freeze. Place them in the fridge and viola! you've just added some really cold mass to your fridge. When the bottles have thawed, set them back outside to freeze. This is like an old-fashioned ice box, and will reduce the amount that the fridge needs to work to keep the interior cold.

      I suggest using small bottles, = 1 L, so that they freeze and thaw more quickly, and so that the amount of ice in the fridge can be adjusted as food is added and removed from the fridge.

    6. Re:Cold beer by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Having your beer cold is your first problem...what the hell is it hiding that requires the temperature to be turned down to numb?

      Drinking most American Beers warm is like recycling urine. Without benefit of the recycling machine. Having your mouth and throat numb is a feature, not a bug.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Cold beer by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why not simply make higher efficiency fridges?

      There are real, and hard, limits on how efficient you can make them - most installed refrigerators are going to have to fit into a standard slot. Increasing insulation means losing internal capacity, and remodeling a kitchen to increase the size of the 'slot' is expensive even where practical.

    8. Re:Cold beer by jdmetz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be honest, I tend to worry a lot less about energy conservation in my home in the winter, since I've got a big machine in my basement dedicated to burning methane for the sole purpose of producing heat.

    9. Re:Cold beer by neomunk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh, you're thinking well, but you've overcomplicated it.

      The heat loss when you open the door is a function of delta_temperature and MASS of the air exchanged. A fuller fridge will lose less of it's cold air simply because there is less cold air to lose. This is of course assuming that the fridge door is open for a relatively short amount of time, long enough for air transfer, but not long enough for the items in the fridge to sink a significant amount of the heat from the (now warmer) air.

      Once you close the door, you're left with a smaller mass of air to cool inside the fridge than with an emptier fridge. The key is closing the door before the HUGE mass of air (the open atmosphere) can dump its practically infinite (for our purposes) amount of heat into the lower temperature items inside the fridge in order to balance the temperatures.

  2. First hack by barberousse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The first hack for those fridges should be a power hog : a fridge that tries to steal as much power as possible from the other fridges. In any cooperative, some will try not to cooperate.

    1. Re:First hack by N1AK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Although it'd be an amusing hack I can't see the real benefit from it.

      The article is looking at this as a way of using things like home renewable energy in the most efficient way.

      Personally I think this is also something that would work well on the 'grid'. Power companies work most efficiently within a small band of demand, when demand falls it is inefficient for them to stop running certain plants and when demand increases the cost of activating dormant supply is high.

      If your house was 'aware' then power companies could dynamically vary power prices within a certain range to try and shape demand to a more normal distrobution. If energy storage tech got more advanced it might even go as far as people fitting small batteries/capacitors/flywheels within their house, that way you could charge power during the night when the power companies currently have an over-supply and drain it during the peak hours.

      To give a real life example of this kind of behaviour, most labs working with plants (in the UK at least) will light their grow rooms during the very early morning. This is because they can get a large discount on energy during certain hours simply because the energy companies were going to generate and waste the energy if they didn't sell it.

  3. Obligitory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one, welcome our ice cube dispensing overlords

  4. How does this actually solve a problem? by mpoulton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fridges are fairly low power devices with naturally random and uncorrelated cycling. One would think that in any given neighborhood, the normal randomness of the many fridges' cycling would be sufficient to result in a fairly level electrical "base load". I can't see that enforcing the levelness of this distribution could actually offer very much of a reduction in the peak load on the grid. What causes excessive peak loading is the coordinated use of many high-power loads. Typically this is air conditioning in the summer - all the units run simultaneously because it's hot outside, and each unit draws about 50 times more power than a fridge. Clothes dryers and washing machines in the evening also do this to a lesser extent. In the grand scheme of things, I really don't think there's much room for improvement through load-leveling of just fridges.

    --
    I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    1. Re:How does this actually solve a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's because you didn't RTFA.

      It's about renewable energy and making the most of solar/wind. I.e. ensure that excess solar energy is used up during the day by cooling the fridges an extra couple of degrees so they don't have to use base load power over night.

      RTFA, you might learn something.

    2. Re:How does this actually solve a problem? by mspohr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Where I live in Switzerland they turn off the power to the hot water heater, washer and dryer every weekday between 11am and 1215. (Supposedly to compensate for everyone cooking lunch at that time.)

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  5. Re:Won't be useful to many people by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This probably isn't pitched at householders. I think it would be great for supermarkets, cold warehouses, booze shops, chemical plants etc... people who need commercial/industrial levels of refrigeration.

  6. Re:Won't be useful to many people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You would be surprised. A lot of people keep a second fridge (or, more often, a second freezer) in their garage or basement. There are also small "dorm" fridges that people use to keep beer, soda, whatever handy.

  7. IPv6 Adopters Rejoice by NTmatter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We've been joking about it for years, but we finally have an answer for the ages-old question of "why would I need an IP address for my fridge?"

    Now, we just need some compelling reasons for networked sinks, sponges, cutlery, and microwaves. Not Talking Toasters though. They'd keep us on IPv4 for another decade.

    1. Re:IPv6 Adopters Rejoice by daveime · · Score: 4, Interesting

      More's to the point, why would you need an EXTERNAL IP just for your coffee machine ?

      Connect your appliances on a traditional network, then map the 10.0.0.* addresses to ports on a single external IP ?

      It's one thing for you to talk to your fridge from the car, but quite another to start dealing with inter-appliance politics ... "Dave, the toaster oven is being nasty to me and stealing all my power again".

  8. Good idea, but we can do better by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had a similar idea, but more general.

    1. Each device contains a controller, and the house power distribution center contains a controller. The device controllers and the house controller communicate over the power lines.
    2. Devices must get permission from the house controller to consume the power they consume (beyond a minimal amount they are allowed to always consumer to power their controllers and sensors).
    3. Devices tell the house how long they will need power, how long they can wait to start, whether they need the power continuously or can pause for a bit if needed, and how much they need. For example, if the fridge needs to start, but can wait a couple minutes, the house might have it wait until the microwave finishes. If the fridge says it can't wait, the house might ask the oven to stop for a a bit so the fridge can have the power to start the compressor.
    4. Ideally, the system would be designed so that there is very little voltage and current at the outlet, until a device asks for it. Then the outlet provides the voltage and current that is asked for. Appliances plugged in but not in use would present much less of a shock hazard this way.
    1. Re:Good idea, but we can do better by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You could accomplish this with intelligent X10 outlets and some coding. Srsly.

    2. Re:Good idea, but we can do better by ledow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's called USB isn't it? :-)

      Seriously, it's a good idea but you'll never really manage to standardise it in a way that brings in into an ordinary house ("gadget" houses and those people who already own X10 networks don't really count as "ordinary" users).

      What's needed, if you're going to do this, is a universal gadget that does some *very* useful things to the average householder. I would suggest things like... water leak detectors tied into the same system that can shut off the water supply to individual devices, smoke alarms, burglar alarms, entry control, baby monitors (bring the house lights up gradually in the nursery when the baby cries) etc. all tied into the same device. The trouble is that any one facility doesn't really make a killer app and there are individual devices that do each job perfectly but the "universal" device that can demonstrate lots of useful benefits brings far too much cost into the equation (at the moment). Even X10 is prohibitively expensive for simple tasks, but I can buy a pair of remote-RF-controlled 13-amp-switching 220v mains sockets (with remote & 12V battery in every pack) for £5 from my local electronics shop.

      I've often looked at automating my house... I have the hardware (opto-isolated I/O boards, relays, spare PC's, tons of logic chips and processors, not to mention cabling, wireless modules, remote sockets, sensors etc.), I have the skills (soldering, wiring, simple logic devices and processors, programming), I even have enough money to do a lot of these things. The problem is that it's much easier and cheaper to just buy a cheap baby monitor, a cheap burglar alarm, a cheap timer, a cheap energy monitor and not let them talk to each other.

      However, if we were to establish a real, authenticated standard for automated house control protocols that all of these things could start supporting with a $5 chip plugged in their mains plug, then these systems would build themselves. X10 was supposed to be that, but a quick search for X10 in my country either produces lots of websites without prices at all (scary enough) or things like £50 for a single X10 mains module that then needs controllers, additional modules etc. before anything interesting can really happen (and then it is mostly basic stuff).

      It's actually less than half the cost for me to buy my off-the-shelf remote-control socket, rip the remote apart (I get one with every mains module anyway, so I have a big stack of spares), take a wire from the button and plug it into a £20 USB I/O kit from Vellemans and write a bash script to do all the fancy stuff... I can already get temperature, I can already monitor electricity (again, cheaper with a £10 energy monitor from the same shop and either a bit of creative disassembly or a webcam reading the 7-segment digits off it).

      This sort of stuff won't go big until there are set standards, that are ubiquitous and start getting included in *everything* (therefore cheap), so that the average homeowner ends up with at least two devices that support it without realising and then thinks "Mmm... these say they can talk together... I wonder what I need to do that?". It's how it worked with Bluetooth... nobody cared or could see the point until you are sitting in your living room with someone else who has Bluetooth and you want to exchange phone numbers etc. When enough people have it to get interest in the general populace (everyone KNOWS you can do this stuff if you have the money), then you can start standardising. But you can't standardise until enough people have it. :-)

  9. Correction... ICEnet by denzacar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Those are not flying fridges - yet.

    And it is quite obvious that should there be a nuclear war fridges would be the only things to survive.
    Indiana Jones taught me that.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  10. Re:Won't be useful to many people by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you extend it this could actually be useful...

    Imagine you have a wind generator on your roof and several appliances connected. If the generator can't power all the devices simultaneously then they could negotiate with each other to smooth out the demand.

    eg. If I put the kettle on to make a cup of tea the fridge could switch itself off for a couple of minutes. If I step in the shower all power can be diverted to the water heater, etc.

    On a larger scale, smoothing out the demand could avoid building power entire power stations. This probably won't happen for the next 100 years, but one day it will.

    --
    No sig today...
  11. Re:Won't be useful to many people by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well it's not going to do anything to reduce an individual household's power usage; certainly nothing that couldn't be done with non-networked smart fridges, anyway. Most people just pay for the amount of energy they use; it doesn't matter if they consume it in large bursts or as a constant trickle.

    This is intended for whole suburbs or cities to be able to regulate the energy draw from cooling fridges so as to decrease peak levels of demand. The other main thrust seems to be regarding renewable energy sources, in particular solar. The idea is that if cloud cover decreases the amount of energy being produced, the plants can tell the fridges and they can intelligently decrease their collective power draw. When the sun's out in full blaze and there's plenty of power being produced, the fridges can cool their interiors by an extra degree or two, effectively storing that additional energy to help them weather a shortage later on.

    Air conditioning seems another obvious target for this technology, since most aircons cool for a while (using lots of power) and then just ran the fan (using little power) until the room heats up a bit, then they cool again. If you have 500,000 aircons all doing this, there's a good chance the power station is going to see big surges in energy draw. If they're all talking to each other, they could negotiate their cycles to place a more consistent draw on the power source, flattening out the peak.

    Of course, I have no idea just how much fluctuation is common in the energy draw at our power stations, and whether this is a practical thing to pursue or just a really cool, clever idea with minimal practical applications.

  12. Re:Won't be useful to many people by troc · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I step in the shower all power can be diverted to the water heater, etc.

    But what about the forward deflector shields?

    --
    Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
  13. Re:10,000 is a lot of fridges... by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, there's a big difference between lab simulations and real-world trials. The previous paragraph suggests the largest trial they've done with real equipment consisted of seven small fridges and three larger industrial-sized coolrooms.

    Also, it's not intended for single locations but rather for "every house in the city". There's little to be gained by smoothing out the energy usage of individual locations, even rather large locations.

  14. Re:What else? by Smivs · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's give every appliance a connection to the Internet!

    Do you really want your Fridge wasting all day on Slashdot?

  15. Re:Won't be useful to many people by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yep ... I was going to put in a Star Trek reference but that would just have been karma-whoring.

    --
    No sig today...
  16. Re:Not insightful. by xaxa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How does a post where it is clear that the poster didn't RTFA get modded insightful?

    Moderators never RTFA either.

  17. Re:Home appliances automation protocol by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd highly recommend going with INSTEON, or building your own custom modules that use WiFi to communicate instead of the powerline. Not many houses have more than 254 outlets in them, so you'd only need a Class C of private address space for your house. I'm not sure if 254 outlets/devices can connect to a single 802.11g/n access point though.

  18. Re:Scientists! by xous · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why is this marked as troll? Any one with a $70 embedded PC, high amperage relay, and a temperature probe could do this in a few hours. This would only be interesting if a) all fridges used a standardized negotiation protocol b) it was extended to all high usage appliances.

  19. Re:Won't be useful to many people by walt-sjc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why yes, yes it is pitched at residential AND commercial sites. This is what "Lonworks" from Echelon is all about - energy management. The technology wasn't designed for just fridges, it was designed for EVERYTHING. Lighting, heating/cooling, dishwashers, laundry, etc. With its 64 bit addressing, it is intended to allow everything to communicate, and peer communications is a big part of it (as is negotiating when to "run".)

    Anyway, these researchers should talk to Echelon. They solved this problem 12 years ago.

  20. Re:Won't be useful to many people by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yep ... I was going to put in a Star Trek reference but that would just have been karma-whoring.

    Funny mods don't give you karma unless that's been changed recently. In fact you usually wind up losing karma because of the jackasses that like to hit every joke they don't get with an overrated mod.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  21. There are quite a few ways to extend functionality by RustinHWright · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fridges as we know them are pretty sad contraptions with no shortage of room for improvement. They put a whopping big heat source under the chamber they're trying to keep cool. They use room air from the hottest part of the house, even though in most homes that room is a foot or two away from outside air that is much cooler, if not actually even cooler than the fridge interior should be. In general, they're an agglomeration of kluges and marketroid idiocies. So yeah, this could be a key part of a rethinking of what a fridge is and how it works that could eventually cut power usage by as much as eighty to ninety percent. The same could be said of quite a lot of appliances and HVAC components. Hell, done right, we now know that comfortable homes can be built that require no conventional heating or cooling systems at all.

    Kinda makes you wonder why we're supposed to need this "smart grid" for all this massive increased demand we supposedly have no way to avoid, doesn't it?

    --
    It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
  22. Nice theory. But not true. by RustinHWright · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You might as well start with a spherical cow.

    Humans are not random operators, especially in industrialized societies. Spikes can come in as little as fifteen to twenty seconds in a society like ours. Rush hour starts and within fifteen minutes you starts seeing a wave spreading away from centers of workplaces of air conditioners being turned on or up and lights going on as people get home. The Superbowl starts and everybody comes indoors from the barbeque to watch the game, air conditioners get turned up as the patio doors get shut. Ad breaks come and toilets all across the area flush within thirty seconds of each other all over the time zone. A big audience tv show has whispering or something else quiet and air conditioners get turned off so people can hear what's on screen.

    We live in a society where most people get up around the same time, go about the same distances, stay away for about the same durations, and come back in to do the same damn things as big chunks of their neighbors for hundreds of miles around. And some of these things, like rushes during ad breaks or when a popular show ends have noticable peaks and drops that can be measured in tens of seconds. This doesn't even get into things like what happens when all the living soil is replaced with pavement and, for example, stormwater load spikes get much higher and then drop off much faster. And then, with all that water moving faster everywhere, again more people turn devices on and off to deal with the consequences.

    No averages have nothing much to do with such demand at all.

    --
    It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
  23. And you fail the reality test again. by RustinHWright · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's your point? There are thousands of things that people "could" do that they don't. They could superinsulate their homes with dirt, straw, and a few weekend days. They could teach their kids the basics of astronomy in an afternoon or two. They could all show up at the polling place and vote for every single election. Hell, we could all build cantennas and have free wireless in every city in the world by the end of this week.

    Reality isn't about what people in theory could do. It's about what they will do. And out here in the real world less than one percent of the population has the skills to do what you're suggesting and less than one percent of that one percent actually might. No comparison to a plan like this, not even taking into account the fundamental issues of determining protocols and load calculations.

    --
    It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
  24. Re:10,000 is a lot of fridges... by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's little to be gained by smoothing out the energy usage of individual locations, even rather large locations.

    My first thought was this would be useful if you're forced to run on a backup generator for a while; This sort of system would allow a supermarket or a largish home to run a smaller margin by not having to worry about every compressor kicking on at once. This would allow a smaller generator, and generators run more efficiently the closer they are to their max capability.

    After the fridge protocol it shouldn't be too hard to come up with other cooperative units - pumps, even a monitor on other circuits so that when the washing machine is running the fridges try to avoid coming on.

    On power district scales, there's already off-peak systems for things like electric water heaters. 240V@23-27A beats 120V@5A anytime, you know?

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  25. Re:There are quite a few ways to extend functional by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's easy to fix as a homeowner if you take the effort and are not a slave to the "fashon police" or are a style freak.

    http://mtbest.net/chest_fridge.pdf

    to change a chest freezer to a incredibly high efficiency fridge.

    and simply locating the fridge with a ductwork system to use cooler basement air to circulate around the waste heat coils is not hard to do.

    It's simply the fault that most homeowners know nothing about a home or construction and cant instruct the contractor, that wants to do as little as possible, what to do.

    It's our culture of ignorance and apathy that propagates the really low efficiency appliances.. People dont shop for how efficient it is, they shop for how pretty and shiny and if it will match my paisley countertops!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  26. Chill pipe to outside? by brunes69 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Living in Canada where it is -25 outside right now, I have always found it an extreme waste of energy to be powering a fridge and freezer to keep things cold in a house I am paying out the nose to heat because it is so cold outside for 1/3 of the year or more.

    How come new houses aren't built with some kind of a "chill pipe", kind of like an insulated duct line that routes outside air directly into the kitchen, that could be connected to the fridge? The pipe could be automatically closed or opened as the fridge detected the temperature outside.

  27. Re:Won't be useful to many people by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That seems like energy conservation taken to a ridiculous extreme to me.

    A model like this means that the people who use the most power pay for the production of those new energy generation facilities that you love so well, while those able to curtail their energy usage are rewarded by being charged less. It is essentially the only logical model. When we build a power plant in the USA, it costs ALL taxpayers some money, even if we live off-grid, because of bullshit subsidies and other nonsense.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  28. Re:What else? by LordKronos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yours doesn't already?

    He's probably just got a really old fridge. He should probably go to Sears and get a new Kenmore fridge. They are on sale this week.

    ***this message was created by the Kenmore Energy Star Net+AI 21.7 Cu. Ft. Refrigerator***

  29. Re:Won't be useful to many people by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Um, they have exactly that... The PP was just being flamebait. Of COURSE you wouldn't want lights being turned off on you when you are in the room.

    But here is the deal.... You really don't want someone else telling you when you can run your own stuff. What you want is things like "we have a peak load time, do what you can to conserve" and YOUR controller starts taking measures to do extra conservation based on your individual needs. Likewise, "we have a surplus, rates are lower right now" so run the dishwasher, etc. You can also do some time-sliced sync of compressors (not just fridges, but AC units too, but if you look at this on a grid-wide basis it's going to even out anyway. Better is to let your fridge warm a couple extra degrees (if your situation allows) during peak load times (not running AT ALL for a while.)

    Going forward, we all need to do what we can to save / manage energy more efficiently. Let's use alternative energy sources "green power" to cut down on legacy power generation, cutting pollution, while at the same time cutting energy consumption to reduce need for legacy power even more.

  30. Re:There are quite a few ways to extend functional by Richy_T · · Score: 2, Funny

    more than 50% of my electricity usage was going towards making food lukewarm.

    Welcome to slashdot, Ronald McDonald.