Slashdot Mirror


Wiretapping Program Ruled Legal

BuhDuh writes "The New York Times is carrying a story concerning that well known bastion of legal authority, the 'Foreign Intelligence Surveillance' court, which has ruled that the National Security Agency's warrantless eavesdropping program was perfectly legal. It says, 'A federal intelligence court, in a rare public opinion, is expected to issue a major ruling validating the power of the president and Congress to wiretap international phone calls and intercept e-mail messages without a court order, even when Americans' private communications may be involved, according to a person with knowledge of the opinion.'"

2 of 575 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Cairo by johnsonav · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Constitutional Law is clear that wuch wiretapping is not allowed unless the police can get a warrant issued by a judge.

    Its not so clear. In the early days of wiretapping, no warrant was required for anyone; as phone calls were not thought to be "persons, houses, papers, and effects". Don't get me wrong, I like that warrants are needed, but the issue has not always been so clear cut.

    --
    ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
  2. Re:Cairo by sbayless · · Score: 5, Informative

    you are aware that U.S. citizens are being held at Guantanamo?

    No, but there is a Canadian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Khadr, who was 15 years old at the time of the alleged crimes.