Slashdot Mirror


A Step Toward an Invisibility Cloak

Technology Review has a writeup on the latest advance in the lab towards an invisibility cloak made of metamaterials, described this week in Science. We've been following this technology since the beginning. The breakthrough is software that lets researchers design materials that are both low-loss and wideband. "The cloak that the researchers built works with wavelengths of light ranging from about 1 to 18 gigahertz — a swath as broad as the visible spectrum. No one has yet made a cloaking device that works in the visible spectrum, and those metamaterials that have been fabricated tend to work only with narrow bands of light. But a cloak that made an object invisible to light of only one color would not be of much use. Similarly, a cloaking device can't afford to be lossy: if it lets just a little bit of light reflect off the object it's supposed to cloak, it's no longer effective. The cloak that Smith built is very low loss, successfully rerouting almost all the light that hits it."

24 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. invisibility schmisibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pics or it didn't happen.

    1. Re:invisibility schmisibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Okay, i will post one here using the magicks of the internets!

      __________________
      ||
      ||
      ||
      ||
      ||
      ||
      |_________________|
      See, look how amazing that thing is!
      It is so invisible it caused the picture to collapse...

    2. Re:invisibility schmisibility by JamesTRexx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Might as well ask for rule 34...

      --
      home
    3. Re:invisibility schmisibility by Warll · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here you go
      NSFW: http://tinyurl.com/9hn2ba

  2. At last! by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can see what happens inside the Girls' dorm!

    Giggity-giggity-goo.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  3. Re:Why not let a bit through? by dotancohen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why would that be no longer effective? If the cloak reroutes 90% of the light, then you're left with 10% opacity, right? Sure, something that translucent would be very difficult to see, especially from a distance.

    The Predator still got his ass shot up good with that hand-held vulcan gun, because the soldier saw the 10% of light that he couldn't cloak.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  4. Re:FUUUU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not broke... it's cloaked!

  5. from TFA by someone1234 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Now [that] this is becoming a more feasible technology, we will start to see a lot more of it."

    Heh, i thought the goal was to see a lot less of it :)

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
  6. No Photo No Talk! by sam0737 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I look forward to the photo of the prototype.

  7. Re:Why not let a bit through? by spiffmastercow · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why would that be no longer effective? If the cloak reroutes 90% of the light, then you're left with 10% opacity, right? Sure, something that translucent would be very difficult to see, especially from a distance.

    The Predator still got his ass shot up good with that hand-held vulcan gun, because the soldier saw the 10% of light that he couldn't cloak.

    Yes, but if you look at it from a D&D point of view, you get a 90% miss chance, which is a game-breaking advantage.

  8. Re:wavelength = length by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not for those of us who don't live in a vacuum, you insensitive clod!

  9. Re:1 to 18 gigahertz by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Funny

    How is 1 to 18 gigahertz a swath as wide as the visual spectrum? It's much wider.

    You must be thinking of the 16k visual spectrum. This is referring to the Spectrum 128k.

  10. Re:Why not let a bit through? by bloodninja · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, but if you look at it from a D&D point of view, you get a 90% miss chance, which is a game-breaking advantage.

    I put on my robe and wizard hat.

    --
    Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
    Return one hour later.
    Who's happy to see you?
  11. California > Minnesota by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why would that be no longer effective? If the cloak reroutes 90% of the light, then you're left with 10% opacity, right? Sure, something that translucent would be very difficult to see, especially from a distance.

    The Predator still got his ass shot up good with that hand-held vulcan gun, because the soldier saw the 10% of light that he couldn't cloak.

    That's what you get for pissing off Jesse "the future Governor of Minnesota" Ventura.
    Cloaking device or not.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  12. Re:wavelength = length by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not for those of us who don't live in a vacuum, you insensitive clod!

    C is still constant. C is the speed of light _in_a_vacuum_ not the speed of light in your parent's basement. And by the way I am a clod, you insensitive pedantic.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  13. Re:wavelength = length by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are you suggesting there might be a flaw in one of the articles posted on Slashdot?

  14. Re:One color invisibility certainly could be of us by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and I ain't an engineer.

    I bet you've a schoolteacher.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  15. Re:FUUUU by LearnToSpell · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, but that link only rerouted 90% of the light. Here, try this one:

  16. Re:wavelength = length by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, I live in a Bose-Einstein condensate, you insensitive clod!

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
  17. Re:Why not let a bit through? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've always wondered if "robe and wizard hat" is code for "short dress and high heels". The things geeks will call their fetishes in order to stave off rejection from women.

  18. Funny? by denzacar · · Score: 2, Funny

    I fail to see what is so funny about that.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  19. Re:Why not let a bit through? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I put on my cloak and tinfoil hat.

    There, fixed that for you. ;)

  20. Re:Why not let a bit through? by KingAlanI · · Score: 2, Funny

    ah, Slashdot.
    D&D rule nitpicking is "informative". :D

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  21. Re:Blindness by ORBAT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seeing "cockpit" hyphenated like that led to some disturbing mental images.