Slashdot Mirror


Presidential Inauguration Hardware and Other Challenges

holy_calamity writes "The FBI has released images of some of the kit that will be deployed to safeguard Obama's inauguration, including mine-proof armored trucks like those used in Iraq to protect against IEDs, and a large armored chamber that any bombs will be shoved inside to be transported away and perhaps detonated inside. Interesting, even though the really good stuff is presumably being kept under wraps." Relatedly, necro81 writes "The Inauguration of Barack Obama tomorrow is expected to put considerable stress on the cellphone network around Washington, DC. The expected crowd could top two million people, and many of them are expected to call, text, tweet, photo, and blog their way through the event. In response, the major wireless carriers in the area have spent millions of dollars upgrading their local networks and will bring in extra 'cells on wheels' (COWs) and 'cells on light trucks' (COLTs). They are also requesting that attendees limit their usage during the event, and avoid bandwidth-heavy activities — like uploading photos — until afterward."

176 comments

  1. Yeah by Jonah+Bomber · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good luck with asking people not to upload photos during the event.

    1. Re:Yeah by Authoritative+Douche · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oops. CNN is advertising an address to upload all your photos taken throughout the day so they can stitch them together to make 360-deg VR photos available as close to real time as they can (several minute delay).

    2. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Does serving torrents off my phone count?

    3. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cell providers are doing something naughty here. They sell their customers service that allows them to send picture messages. Then they cannot satisfy the demand for the services they already sold, so they ask us nicely to keep spending money on inferior text messages. Remember text messages are already a ripoff, and have zero network overhead, as we already discussed.

      Shouldn't they at least offer affected customers free text messaging to align incentives with avoiding network congestion? Or find some way to reward (read: not continue to rip off) people who avoid sending the picture messages that CNN has requested?

    4. Re:Yeah by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps I'm showing my age, but I don't understand the appeal of texting. First off, emailing is free so there's no point paying for a text. And second, I'd rather HEAR the person I'm communicating with. The cost is only 18 cents a minute, and you can communicate far more information with that 18 cents of talking than with a 5 cent text.

      Another disconnect is the fuss about downtime.

      So what? When I was growing-up, we didn't just lose our cellphones; we lost our electricity! A blizzard comes through; goodbye electricity. A tropical storm tears down the line; goodbye electricity. One time the lightning followed the line from the street, into the barn, killed one of the horses, and then turned half our electric fence into ash. ----- So based upon those experiences, not being able to sending a photo wirelessly seems incredibly trivial. At least you don't need to fear freezing to death or having barbecued horse to clean up.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:Yeah by Sen.NullProcPntr · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I'm showing my age, but I don't understand the appeal of texting. First off, emailing is free so there's no point paying for a text. And second, I'd rather HEAR the person I'm communicating with.

      It's my understanding that much of the texting kids do today is to friends that are near enough that just talking without any electronics involved would work. This according to a co-worker who who has 3 girls in HS and 2 in college.

      And to think my parents didn't understand why I would use a walkie-talkie to talk to my friend two houses down when I was a kid;-)

    6. Re:Yeah by the_weasel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I send you a text, you respond when you have time. I call you, you have to choose between ignoring me and taking my call. Texting is asynchronous, where a conversation is synchronous. Granted, I can communicate more information in a short amount of time with a phone conversation, but if my issue is non-critical then texting is often more effective.

      I am talking about texting from a business prospective here. I often text sales staff on the road, who may well be in a meeting, or contractors on a noisy job site. A director in a meeting with an artist. In all these cases texting not only gets them the information they need without them having o interrupt some other task, it also avoids the need for them to grab a pen or some other device - I just include the information. No lost or misunderstood numbers or names.

      Now social texting does confuse me. "OMG! I am at the inaugaration". Why???

      --
      - sarcasm is just one more service we offer -
    7. Re:Yeah by rabbit994 · · Score: 1

      It has it's appeal in fact that A. Phone calls are an interrupt. While I can let it roll to voicemail, I then have call my voicemail and retrieve my messages. B. You can send text messages in places where calling someone is considered rude. C. not all phones have Email support while almost all cell phones do. D. For short stuff, text messages are quicker. I can send a quick text to girlfriend "Where Dinner Tonight?" and she can respond with "restaruant A,B,C,D" and I can go "B". It takes about 1 minute to type out and we can respond to each other when we have time at work.

      As far as downtime, It's just like telephone networks or internet, they sell based on the fact not everyone is going to be using their systems 100% of the time. If cell phone companies charged for their system to be able to handle 100%, basic plans would cost 350 dollars and unlimited would be 1000 or so. The real concern is all the cops there will be using Cell phones and they will need to communicate using them and if something happens, they won't be able to communicate.

    8. Re:Yeah by muridae · · Score: 1

      Email is free, email on your phone isn't. With Verizon, I think they charge something near 15$ a month for unlimited free texts, but 20 or more for 'internet' service to check email with. And, with free texts, my phone can be texted from an email address, so people can email me and I can text back to their email.

      To top it off, free texts comes with free IMs. Which, when you think about it, is closer to what text messages are than email.

    9. Re:Yeah by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      The appeal is that it a quick way to communicate quickly without all the obligatory social filler that normally comes with a phone call. Also it is more courteous than a phone call because a text message is not as disruptive. The receiver can read and respond to the message at their convenience.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    10. Re:Yeah by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 2, Informative

      First off, emailing is free so there's no point paying for a text.

      There is if you want someone to get it when you send it as opposed to whenever they might decide to check their e-mail, and believe me, not everybody checks their e-mail every few minutes.

    11. Re:Yeah by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Mmmmhh... horse barbecue! Soo good when it's cold outside!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    12. Re:Yeah by adolf · · Score: 1

      Where?

    13. Re:Yeah by segwonk · · Score: 2, Informative

      www.cnn.com/themoment Heard it on NPR earlier today.

      --
      - ------ Go 'til ya know.
    14. Re:Yeah by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it's a Microsoft Photosynth promo event - that's the "VR" that they're using.

    15. Re:Yeah by xaxa · · Score: 1

      The real concern is all the cops there will be using Cell phones and they will need to communicate using them and if something happens, they won't be able to communicate.

      In the UK emergency services people can register their phone numbers and are then given priority when a cell is overloaded (other people are cut off to make room for them).

    16. Re:Yeah by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      Similarly, emergency 999 (or 911/112) calls take priority over other cell users' - if a cell is at capacity, a user making a 999 call will cause another user to be disconnected to allow the emergency call.
      This can be abused: if you're on a GSM network that is heavily overloaded (New Years Eve, big public events) as the GSM stations are at capacity, you can cause other users to be kicked off by starting a 999 call, then terminating before it connects, and immediately making your conventional phone call. Not exactly whitehat, though...!

    17. Re:Yeah by xaxa · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding that much of the texting kids do today is to friends that are near enough that just talking without any electronics involved would work. This according to a co-worker who who has 3 girls in HS and 2 in college.

      In school you might be close enough to talk, but talking might not be allowed, or desired. Texting is private and discreet (except many teachers will notice).

      If you look round you'll probably see your younger co-workers texting friends.

    18. Re:Yeah by Sen.NullProcPntr · · Score: 1

      In school you might be close enough to talk, but talking might not be allowed, or desired. Texting is private and discreet (except many teachers will notice).

      The most recent example I was given happened in a restaurant. Maybe it was just force of habit in that case but what does that say about paying attention in school? Kind of like sitting next to someone and constantly whispering back and forth.

      If you look round you'll probably see your younger co-workers texting friends.

      You are right about that at least those with blackberrys and iphones. Although more often they are on chat talking to the person in the next cubicle;-)

    19. Re:Yeah by ultranova · · Score: 1

      At least you don't need to fear freezing to death or having barbecued horse to clean up.

      Cut open the horse, crawl inside, and sleep in the sweet warmth of its guts. Or was this before Empire Strikes Back came out ?-)

      Besides, back in my day we didn't have any horses. We had to travel to Japan, find a samurai and beat him up with our bare hands so he would commit seppuku. And we were glad to have hands !

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    20. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would NOT recommend this. Just the other day a friend of mine got in a fight with her boyfriend, and during her fit she decided to threaten calling the cops. She got the number punched in (non-emergency even!), hit dial, and then immediately hung up. The police showed up a short while later knocking at the door, ignored her when she said not to come in, broke down the door, and hauled her boyfriend off to jail. Then came the coolest 5:30AM call I'd ever gotten.
      Anyways, moral of the story is: they can tell you tried to call even if nobody picks up. Help WILL come, whether you want it or not.

    21. Re:Yeah by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Does serving torrents off my phone count?

      Torrents are evil and unAmerikan! Who do you think you are? A member of the pirate party in Switzerland!?


      Arrrrrr!

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    22. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps I'm showing my age, but I don't understand the appeal of texting. First off, emailing is free so there's no point paying for a text. And second, I'd rather HEAR the person I'm communicating with. The cost is only 18 cents a minute, and you can communicate far more information with that 18 cents of talking than with a 5 cent text.

      I'll attempt to be somewhat nice.

      1. I pay $12.00 for unlimited text & image messages (I don't give a crap about pictures but it comes with the deal). I easily have 1,000 texts a month between send/receive.
      2. I don't pay ANY roaming for text messages.
      3. I don't pay ANY International long distance for text messages.

      4. In areas of poor coverage, I can get a simple text through to someone. A voice call in this situation either wouldn't connect, or would be so broken up that I'd spend a lot of time trying to communicate information, without being able to tell if it was understood.

      5. I have a record of texts I have sent.
      6. I can store 100 texts on my phone model, which holds a lot more data than my voicemail. Especially if it's my girlfriend (ya, the imaginary one) calling, I get about 2 voicemails before the server is full.
      7. Text messages can que up when I'm out of coverage & deliver when I come in range.
      8. I can send/receive texts in situations where I need to not make noise, like meetings, kids school recitals, etc.
      9. I can send a picture with a text.

      10. Did I mention you can send AUDIO with a text? Just like leaving a voicemail, except I record my message & just send it. None of those jackass VM interfaces "To send your message with asinine delivery, press #, *, 0,0,1,4,etc.". This allows you to use two cell phones essentially as a walkie-talkie or CB-style radio. Without roaming charges, etc.

      Don't get me wrong, if I just want to talk to someone, or have a conversation, then yes I just call. But many times I just need to communicate basic info, like "meeting is at 5pm" or "We're stopping for gas at exit 294" or "The mailing address of your mother is xxx".

      So what? When I was growing-up, we didn't just lose our cellphones; we lost our electricity!

      Ummm yes, that still happens quite often these days as well. Including lightning strikes on livestock. I've seen ever spookier & more dangerous weather than anything in your story to boot.

      Telegraph, morse code, semaphore signals, etc. would be a better analogy that you might understand.

      Now go kick those kids off the lawn, dammit!

    23. Re:Yeah by adolf · · Score: 1

      That, sir, is one of the niftiest things I've ever seen.

      Thank you.

  2. Twitter is screwed. by Rayeth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Twitter's service is likely to be as screwed as the cell network with millions of people around the country tweeting about how they just saw (on TV, Internet or in person) Obama swear in, etc. Expect the service to be down most of the day imo.

    1. Re:Twitter is screwed. by Reapman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And nothing of value was lost... sorry had to say it, mod down as you will!

    2. Re:Twitter is screwed. by megamerican · · Score: 4, Funny

      Expect the service to be down most of the day imo.

      That's change I can believe in.

      Sadly, that's about all I can look forward too but that's another discussion alltogether. :)

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    3. Re:Twitter is screwed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horray cynical-pessimism.

    4. Re:Twitter is screwed. by Rayeth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the most part I actually agree with you. I am not really looking forward to the deluge of updates that are in store. Especially considering the number that already are showing up, "OMG only 2 days left to end the worst 8 years ever!"

      Which would be fine, but clearly most of these people haven't even been voting age for 8 years -- let alone 12. So don't mind it when I don't trust their opinion on the state of the state as it were.

      Its great that young people are more involved in politics now, I think that is a good thing for the country. Though I wish they would stop complaining about a single President and worry more about how to fix the things they don't like instead of hoping for a magical Obama panacea

    5. Re:Twitter is screwed. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those who turned 18 and were eligible to vote for the first time in 2008 were in elementary school when Bush was (s)elected. He's been in office pretty much the entire time they've been aware of politics at all. Given what a horrorshow both his terms have been, they can, I think, be forgiven for seeing Obama as something special. It's kind of like what happens to an abused kid who grows up, gets out of his parents' house, and realizes that there are people in the world who won't beat the shit out of him every time he opens his mouth -- sooner or later, he'll realize that the world contains good people and bad ones in about equal measure, but at first, just about everyone is going to seem wonderful in comparison.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:Twitter is screwed. by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm going to spend the data watching the coverage over the rabbit ears/antenna. Yeah I know... old-fashioned 60-year-old technology, but it still works. :-) It will be the last time a presidential inauguration was broadcast using analog NTSC.* After tomorrow it will be broadcast exclusively in HD digital.

      *
      *(Technically the last time will probably be in 2013, since Mexico still uses NTSC, but I don't live there.)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:Twitter is screwed. by bugg · · Score: 1

      There will probably be digital standard definition broadcasts as well. ATSC supports standard definition resolutions as well, which are especially useful for when a broadcaster multiplexes multiple streams into a single channel.

      --
      -bugg
    8. Re:Twitter is screwed. by radish · · Score: 1

      Exclusively digital, not HD. SD broadcasts will continue for quite some time.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    9. Re:Twitter is screwed. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Both of you said the same thing, but I have to disagree.

      By the time 2013 rolls-around, all the networks will be broadcasting in 720p or 1080i, not standard def. Right now ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CW, and MyNetTV are all showing HD video of the inauguration. The only holdout is IOn which still sends 480i, but I'm sure that will change during the next year or two.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  3. Re:Huge waste of money by tsalmark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He is not actually in charge until after the ceremony. I don't think he has as much say in this as you imply he does, not that I see him complaining.

  4. Pretty spectacular by Haoie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's certainly been a vast advancement in technology [especially communications] since early 2001.

    So that's technology like social networking, blogging, microblogging, webcasting, etc etc.

    It'll be a memorable event.

    --
    If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
  5. I wonder if ... by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

    cells on wheels' (COWs) and 'cells on light trucks' (COLTs).

    PETA knows about the abuse these will get.

    --

    - - - - - - - - - - -
    I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  6. Re:Huge waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Coronation ceremony" covers it. I am sick to death of the fucking "Rock Star" routine, especially since everyone seems to be sucking it up. All the guy has done since his state house days is run for president. Every time a controversial vote came up, he passed unless he had a carefully-polled stance already prepared. His entire campaign was based on taking the most popular position on everything.

    It will be interesting to see what he does when he actually has to make an unpopular decision.

  7. Re:Huge waste of money by fotbr · · Score: 1, Troll

    Do you think the media would allow anything less from the one they've appointed to be the next messiah?

    Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Or in this case, meet the new puppet, same as the old puppet.

  8. COWs and COLTs by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surely there is no need for two new buzzwords. The light trucks have wheels so they are also COWs. Or do COLTs only work for OMG Pink Pony calls.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:COWs and COLTs by snowraver1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Killjoy. This is cool stuff. I would guess that the COW is a trailer and the COLT is a truck. I've always been facinated with satellite communications, and this looks really neat. I would love to be the guy that gets to drive that beast in, fire up the generator, press button one for the mast and radios, then button two for the auto aligning satellite. All this while onlookers stare in wonder.

      On another note, this must have taken A LOT of planning. You usually can't just throw more cells in all willy-nilly. They would have to lower power on nearby cells and maybe even temporarily put cells on different frequencies to free up space for these microcells.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:COWs and COLTs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is standard terminology. Not new buzzwords. Working in the wireless industry, I know this for a fact.

    3. Re:COWs and COLTs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After Katrina, Cingular (and probably other carriers as well) rolled a bunch of COWs into New Orleans on amazingly short notice to provide resembling a communications infrastructure.

      In light of this, the lengthy cell outage in the upper midwest recently after a power outage in a network center seems somewhat odd.

    4. Re:COWs and COLTs by halcyon1234 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Surely there is no need for two new buzzwords.

      And I gotta tell you: fellas.. you have got what appears to be a dynamite inauguration! I'll be honest.. fellas, it was communicating great. But.. I could've used a little more Bell COWs!

    5. Re:COWs and COLTs by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Why can't cells overlap one another? I don't completely understand the technology, but I thought cellphones had the ability to share frequencies without interference, even if 3 or 4 towers are within "hearing" distance of the signal.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    6. Re:COWs and COLTs by adolf · · Score: 1

      Covering the hairier parts of a post-Katrina New Orleans after a big storm with days of warning, and "the upper midwest" with zero warning are rather two totally different tasks.

    7. Re:COWs and COLTs by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      ...Or have the COW detect the surrounding cells and pick its operating frequencies and power level accordingly?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  9. Re:Huge waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he wants to have the government spend money to stimulate the economy. Only part of the funding is public, much is private too.

  10. Re:Huge waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He doesn't dictate his "coronation ceremony". A lot of the money is for security purposes. Millions of people are expected to be present for it and there are a lot of fears that someone will try to kill him, which is why he got Secret Service protection incredibly early during Primary season.

  11. I'm in DC and not going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I'm going to try to use up some bandwidth anyway, you know, just to make visitors' lives a little less fun.

    1. Re:I'm in DC and not going by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good luck with that! I was going to say that the only way to make a visitor to DC's visit less fun would be to shoot then rob them, but that's pretty much already on the itinerary, isn't it?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  12. Right wing garbage by thedogcow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh please, this cost myth is just your average right wind Drudge myth garbage. Check this article out. They are claiming the Obama inauguration will be 160 million. Well the 2005 Bush inauguration was 157 million. Not much difference folks.

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:Right wing garbage by alta · · Score: 1

      Just your typical media matters drivel. Sure, they CLAIM. Drudge claims. Rush, Savage, Beck, huffington, air america, they all claim something.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    2. Re:Right wing garbage by Slur · · Score: 2, Informative

      Regardless of your political leanings, when it comes to debunking media distortions Media Matters rules!

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    3. Re:Right wing garbage by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the article is wrong perhaps you could be kind enough to point out the logical or factual errors?

      Of course everyone claims something, but not all claims are equal. Some are backed up by facts while others are pure fabrications.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    4. Re:Right wing garbage by TimSSG · · Score: 1

      I agree not much difference, but the left complained loudly about spending too much on Bush inauguration. I figure in 8 years the left will complain loudly once more. Tim S

    5. Re:Right wing garbage by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Informative

      GPP's use of the word "they" was a little unclear. The point is that Drudge, Limbaugh, et al. are claiming that Obama's inauguration will be much more expensive than Bush's, while Media Matters (and numerous other sources) are setting the record straight. The right-wing noise machine is saying that Obama's inauguration is costing ~$160 million (true) while Bush's only cost ~$40 million (false.) They get the difference in the figures, IIRC, by leaving out the cost of security for Bush but including it for Obama. The fact is that Obama's inauguration is barely more expensive than Bush's in absolute dollars, and factoring in inflation over the last eight years, it's probably cheaper.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:Right wing garbage by mrlibertarian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Regardless of your political leanings, when it comes to debunking media distortions Media Matters rules!

      Regardless of your political leanings? They say in their 'About Us' page that they're only interested in misinformation that forwards the conservative agenda. That's a shame. Why not correct misinformation from all sides?

    7. Re:Right wing garbage by fotbr · · Score: 1

      As the saying goes..

      Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

      s/boss/puppet/ if you prefer.

    8. Re:Right wing garbage by splatter · · Score: 1

      Except the economist in me has to wonder if they are factoring in any cash number for the lost job hours both in the fed, 3 block radius around the convention center, and closed bridges? That is all new and costs all the NOVA cities, fed, and local industry.

      Yes my business is closed, and I am off today because our staff can't get in and we are bound by law to ratios, if we can not maintain them we have to close. We collect monthly so one day off is not significant to us but you can bet it is to some of my staff.

       

      --
      "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
    9. Re:Right wing garbage by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Regardless of your political leanings? They say in their 'About Us' page that they're only interested in misinformation that forwards the conservative agenda. That's a shame. Why not correct misinformation from all sides?

      Amazing how this argument only applies to the "left" (MM & the ACLU) but never the right (Media Research Center & the NRA).

    10. Re:Right wing garbage by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      I agree not much difference, but the left complained loudly about spending too much on Bush inauguration.

      Not really, it was too busy complaining about the fact that Bush stole the election.

    11. Re:Right wing garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was done with 8 years ago. Get over it already.

    12. Re:Right wing garbage by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Ooo, big talk from the wingnuts who can't let FDR go. Or the CRA. Or Clinton.

      Fuck off, posers.

    13. Re:Right wing garbage by slapout · · Score: 1

      It's not about how much it costs. It's about who's paying for it. It seems that several people connected with the recent government bailouts have made large contributions.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  13. MRAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does the FBI need an MRAP? Cough "Poser!" Cough

    1. Re:MRAP by megamerican · · Score: 1

      Mobile Response Assassination Patsy?

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
  14. Bring out the bullet-proof bubble! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just really hope he doesn't get assassinated by some wacko gunman or other conspiracy ploy. Think of the massive backlash, Los Angeles would pretty much burn to the ground with the intensity of a thousand Laker games.

    1. Re:Bring out the bullet-proof bubble! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope too however I'm half expecting someone to take a shot at him. If I was Obama I'd be shitting my pants.

  15. Re:Huge waste of money by megamerican · · Score: 2, Informative

    Every time a controversial vote came up, he passed unless he had a carefully-polled stance already prepared. His entire campaign was based on taking the most popular position on everything.

    Not true. He voted to give the telecoms retroactive immunity which everyone was against. He voted for and was a major cheerleader for the banker bailout bill. Both bills were extremely unpopular.

    He has also mentioned "sacrifice" and national service over and over again, which I doubt is very popular. Biden and Obama have both said their policies are not going to be popular but we should just trust them! I seem to remember the last administration saying the same thing. Except now if you don't like their policies you'll be both unpatriotic and racist.

    It always seemed like people refused to look at what Obama says rationally because they are so blindsided by hatred for Bush and the repitition of "change" and "hope."

    --
    If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
  16. Re:Huge waste of money by amRadioHed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So Bill Clinton was a traitor, but not the guys who outed a CIA agent? I hate to point it out but your bias is showing. How embarrassing.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  17. Re:Huge waste of money by vux984 · · Score: 1

    One would think that a new leader in today's economy, especially one who promotes "change", would have a dozen people together and maybe the press and swear in. Instead this "politics as usual" phony spends millions of dollars with his coronation ceremony.

    If you want the kind of change Obama has promised, the best way for him to make it happen is to keep the public engaged, keep them thinking about presidents and politics and policy... instead of "American Idol" and "Ow! My Balls!"

    A big inauguration ceremony will keep the public and the world in tune and talking about it. Your suggestion, on the other hand would engage the public less than "Home Improvement" reruns.

  18. Real message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be afraid, but we are here to protect you (but only from moderately large whoopee cushions, anything else you are on your own).

  19. Here's an idea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They could dig up Leni Riefenstahl and have her film the inauguration and then show it all over the world in huge sports coliseums!

  20. Re:Huge waste of money by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wish there was some sacrifice. All I see is two trillion in bailout/stimulus pork.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  21. You can't stop a determined assassin, period. by plasmacutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can't stop a determined assassin.

    Prepare for one thing and they'll use another, and never, ever underestimate the effectiveness of someone willing to trade their own life for the life of the target.

    I'm not saying this to brew fear, i'm saying this to point out there is a reasonable point at which marginal returns to extra security diminish, and a point at which flexibility (hence my example) is more important than durability.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:You can't stop a determined assassin, period. by fermion · · Score: 1
      but given the number of weapons that have been sold in the past few months, and the amount of ammunition, I was under the impression we were talking about large scale para military forces, not the lone gunman.

      I understand that gun stores are having fun raking in the profits by citing the end of the world and the end of gun sales, and the danger of having a non white person in an office that over the past few years have been given dictatorial powers, but really it is not that bad. the end of the world will either be here or not, and skills other than defense will likely be needed. while gun sales might be restricted, for instance the practice of selling gun to known criminal might be stopped, and waiting periods extended, guns will be available. While I agree that any registration is no great, and any restrictions not great, the reality is that average american would be a little jittery with thermonuclear devices next door. As far as the dictatorship, the conservatives are already working to correct that mistake made in the drunkenness of power.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:You can't stop a determined assassin, period. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So we assume that the various assassins who were stopped just weren't determined?

    3. Re:You can't stop a determined assassin, period. by twostix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tell that to Fidel Castro 638 foiled attempts - http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/aug/03/cuba.duncancampbell2

    4. Re:You can't stop a determined assassin, period. by kperson · · Score: 2, Funny

      You never really have to say "ever" after "never". It actually reduces the effect of your sentence, like adding the word "actually". Um, I mean...

  22. Left wing garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh please, that link is just your average left wing Soros funded myth garbage.

  23. Re:Huge waste of money by maino82 · · Score: 1

    no, no, no... he said mr. bill

  24. That's so nice.. by blueforce · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's so nice that the picture inside the mobile command center has a split screen monitor with the food network, themselves, days of our lives, and The Care Bears.

    How cute.

    --
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  25. Care Bears? by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Note the Care Bears on the monitor in the mobile command center in photo 8. Gives me the chuckles. :)

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

    1. Re:Care Bears? by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      It's probably either "photoshopped" so they're not showing what's really on it. Or they have some pre-configured "guests without clearance are here" screen that they can change all the monitors to with the push of a button.

    2. Re:Care Bears? by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's nothing to laugh at. If you tried to get at Obama, those Care Bares would fucking murder you. With care!

    3. Re:Care Bears? by N1ck0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's probably either "photoshopped" so they're not showing what's really on it. Or they have some pre-configured "guests without clearance are here" screen that they can change all the monitors to with the push of a button.

      Assuming these pictures didn't span multiple visits and taking the following into account:
      1. The shadows in all the pics show the sun is at a very low angle.
      2. The state of the trees, combined with green IVY in pic 3 indicate its mid-fall.
      3. In mid-fall sun would only be as low as the reflection in the bomb containment vessel in the mid/late-morning and the evening.
      4. The clock indicates it is 10:33:24 (can't be PM because of the sun)
      5. The upper left looks like a morning talk show, and the lower left looks to be a talk show, or game show. (the other is an interior cam)

      I can conclude that they most likely have tuned the TV to local over-the-air TV stations to show that they can both monitor the news and closed circuit feeds on their display system....

      But you know...just a hunch.

    4. Re:Care Bears? by tool462 · · Score: 1

      That's not Care Bears, just the sprites they use for the pedophile monitoring system. Any "Care Bear Stare" animations indicate an offense in progress.

    5. Re:Care Bears? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      or more likely; that's just what's usually on the screen.

    6. Re:Care Bears? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase:

      Assuming these pictures didn't span multiple visits and taking the following into account:
      1. The shadows in all the pics show the sun is at a very low angle.
      2. The state of the trees, combined with green IVY in pic 3 indicate its mid-fall.
      3. In mid-fall sun would only be as low as the reflection in the bomb containment vessel in the mid/late-morning and the evening.
      4. The clock indicates it is 10:33:24 (can't be PM because of the sun)
      5. The upper left looks like a morning talk show, and the lower left looks to be a talk show, or game show. (the other is an interior cam)

      I can conclude that they most likely have tuned the TV to local over-the-air TV stations to show that they can both monitor the news and closed circuit feeds on their display system....

      To paraphrase succinctly: They were watching TV.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  26. Re:Huge waste of money by SomeJoel · · Score: 1

    no, no, no... he said mr. bill

    Oh no.

    --
    <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
  27. Re:Huge waste of money by peragrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clinton got a blow job from someone who wasn't his wife, and he is a traitor, yet Bush lied to the american public about every reason for invading Iraq and he isn't?

    Al queda hated saddam as much as we did, and didn't move into Iraq until after we did.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  28. This "coronation" stuff is overdone by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This coronation-like ceremony is getting out of hand. A quiet ceremony in the Capitol, broadcast on TV, would be sufficient. That's what was done during WWII, when there were concerns about an attack on FDR.

    This is the first time an inauguration has shut down Washington, DC for two days. All the Potomac River bridges out to the Beltway are closed Monday and Tuesday. That's well beyond the impact of previous inaugurations.

    1. Re:This "coronation" stuff is overdone by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      This coronation-like ceremony is getting out of hand. A quiet ceremony in the Capitol, broadcast on TV, would be sufficient. That's what was done during WWII, when there were concerns about
      an attack on FDR.

      This is the first time an inauguration has shut down Washington, DC for two days. All the Potomac River bridges out to the Beltway are closed Monday and Tuesday. That's well beyond the impact of previous inaugurations.

      He was talking about change we can believe in, and by god he meant it!

      If you don't believe in this change, you can try to cross the bridges and see for yourself!

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:This "coronation" stuff is overdone by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is the first time an inauguration has shut down Washington, DC for two days. All the Potomac River bridges out to the Beltway are closed Monday and Tuesday.

      And nothing of value was lost....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:This "coronation" stuff is overdone by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      You may want to read up on the Bill of Rights.

    4. Re:This "coronation" stuff is overdone by TempeTerra · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obama's first act is to shut down DC for two days? Truly, our saviour is here! ;)

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
    5. Re:This "coronation" stuff is overdone by Mozk · · Score: 1

      *Verbally mods up*

      --
      No existe.
    6. Re:This "coronation" stuff is overdone by pkphilip · · Score: 1

      This "coronation" stuff is overdone

      This is an understatement. People are losing jobs by the millions and here we have a person who claims to be heralding the change but who thinks nothing about spending over $100 million on his "inauguration".

      There has not been a single Presidential inauguration in history which has been this over the top.

      Would it have been too much to expect the president-elect to even display a modicum of empathy with those who are suffering? Obama needn't have opted for a ceremony which is a toned down version of the regular presidential inauguration (a low key ceremony would have been appropriate given the current economic climate), but he has opted for the extreme other end of the scale and gone in for a completely overblown ceremony.

      And yet we are all expected to believe that things are going to be much better now that Obama is the president.

    7. Re:This "coronation" stuff is overdone by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      Lighten up a little.

      "There has not been a single Presidential inauguration in history which has been this over the top."

      True, true. But when was the last time we a black President being sworn in? Kind of a unique situation.

      And, if nothing else, consider it a celebration of the LAST President LEAVING.

      That make it a little easier to accept?

    8. Re:This "coronation" stuff is overdone by Uberbah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Morons. Millions of people aren't showing up because it's a big event, it's a big event because millions of people want to show up. If you want to be a WATB, start complaining at conservatives for running the country into the ground over the last 30 years, making people hungry for something different.

      It should also be pointed out that much like the lie about auto workers earning $71 an hour, the comparisons between the cost of Obama's inauguration (WITH the cost of security) and Bush's (WITHOUT security) are completely disingenuous.

  29. 911 by necro81 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My concern is what if something bad were to happen during the inauguration, and suddenly a million people whip out their cellphones all start calling 911, their family, news organizations, and generally broadcast an emergency to the world all at the same time.

    Anyone want to watch one of those expensive cell-towers on a truck burst into flames?

    1. Re:911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Anyone want to watch one of those expensive cell-towers on a truck burst into flames?

      THAT IS NOT HOW CELLPHONE TOWERS WORK! GOODNIGHT!

    2. Re:911 by dangle · · Score: 1

      There are a variety of strategies that allow cellular networks to function in these situations, and to ensure that certain phones can almost always use the network. http://wps.ncs.gov/

    3. Re:911 by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      I've been in a couple situations where a bunch of people called 911 at the same time from the same place, and in both cases a few of us got a busy signal. My assumption was that this was a feature to prevent the very kind of overload you're talking about.

    4. Re:911 by uranus65 · · Score: 1

      By embiggening the cellular infrastructure, they might be enabling potential bombers who otherwise might not be able to get their detonation call through.

    5. Re:911 by sootman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because I'm sure no one at nearby 911 centers, police stations, fire stations, and hospitals will be watching the ceremony. Not to mention every government agency will have multiple feeds and private lines of communication. If anything goes wrong tomorrow, I'm sure people that need to know will know pretty quickly.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re:911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      embiggening

      wtf?

    7. Re:911 by Whillowhim · · Score: 1

      If they burst into flame, you just have to revert to older technology.... smoke signals.

    8. Re:911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then they will already have personnel on scene with actual radios instead of cell phones.

    9. Re:911 by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      What's your problem? It's a perfectly crommulent word.

    10. Re:911 by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I never said that emergency services wouldn't get the message, or that somehow their communications would be totally blown away. Emergency communications are mostly based on handheld radios, not cellphones, and an emergency would be responded to through whatever security command center they've set up, not 911 dispatch. But in a panic situation, you can't expect everyone in the crowd to realize that. They'll still make calls.

      Even those who keep their heads about them will probably be uploading pictures, blogging, tweeting, calling their family, or whatever else, and generally consuming (or trying to consume) massive amounts of bandwidth.

    11. Re:911 by ultranova · · Score: 1

      My concern is what if something bad were to happen during the inauguration, and suddenly a million people whip out their cellphones all start calling 911, their family, news organizations, and generally broadcast an emergency to the world all at the same time.

      I'd be more worried about mass panic. Suppose someone blows a smoke bomb, or something else flashy but harmless, and then yells: "Terrorists ! It's a chemical weapon ! Run for your lives !" ? It wouldn't be pretty.

      You have lots of people afraid of terrorists in a ceremony that has a bullseye painted all over it. If someone farts too loudly, it's going to be a bloodbath.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  30. BSOD by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    My concern is what if something bad were to happen during the inauguration, and suddenly a million people whip out their cellphones all start calling 911, their family, news organizations, and generally broadcast an emergency to the world all at the same time.

    Anyone want to watch one of those expensive cell-towers on a truck burst into flames?

    Given their decision to go with silverlight for the event, I suspect the trucks would BSOD long before that happens.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  31. Re:Huge waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wish there was some sacrifice. All I see is two trillion in bailout/stimulus pork.

    No, see, the average person is the one expected to make a sacrifice so that the higher-ups can continue to afford their expensive lifestyles.

  32. The point by ShooterNeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The point of all this security isn't to stop a serious, well funded attempt to assasinate this man. As many people have pointed out, unless they kept the person in a bunker or in a series of undisclosed locations, a well funded team could probably harm him or her.

    Except...any sane organization has nothing to gain by killing this leader. Unlike a dictator, the president can be easily replaced with someone else, and routinely is swapped out ever 4-8 years. In fact, a reasonable person would expect a backlash. The real reason the U.S. government doesn't give two shits about the Palestinians is because they kind of seem like the same kind of guys who committed the 9/11 terrorist attacks. That's backlash.

    Any group that killed the American president would be crushed, and would never get anything they wanted.

    However, lone nuts and other poorly equipped people get mad at the President all the time. The secret service can probably stop such morons in almost all situations.

    Also, a lot of the security is reactive. Presidents who were killed in the past were usually killed by some kind of small arms attack. Hence the bulletproof limo and the ring of armed guards. If some other form of attack ever succeeded, god forbid, then security precautions might change. Such as eliminating public appearances entirely and doing everything via teleconference and holograms.

    1. Re:The point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they morons in a hurry?

  33. Mobile Command Center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they really need a mobile command center? What about their static command center http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Edgar_Hoover_Building

    1. Re:Mobile Command Center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_theatre

  34. Re:Huge waste of money by DittoBox · · Score: 1
    --
    Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
  35. Re:Huge waste of money by Score+Whore · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You don't follow politics much do you? Clinton got impeached for perjury, not for diddling the unattractive intern.

    Bush made a judgment call about what the intelligence information meant.

  36. Re:Huge waste of money by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    "So Bill Clinton was a traitor, but not the guys who outed a CIA agent? I hate to point it out but your bias is showing. How embarrassing."

    You mean Richard Armitage? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Armitage_(politician)#Role_in_Plame_affair

    I especially like this part:

    ...Patrick Fitzgerald began his grand jury investigation three months later knowing Armitage was a leaker (as did Attorney General John Ashcroft before turning over the investigation).

    On March 6, 2007 a jury convicted Libby of "obstruction of justice, giving false statements to the FBI and perjuring himself, charges embodied in four of the five counts of the indictment"

    So, the guy who actually committed the crime was given a total pass, but they convicted Libby for "obstructing" a bogus investigation?

    I won't excuse all or even most of the things the administration did, but the Plame affair isn't a very sturdy stick to beat them with.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  37. Re:Huge waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forgive me if I'm wrong, but doesn't spending money stimulate the economy? Beyond just the government spending in the area at the time, I'm sure the influx of millions of tourists will certainly help the local economy.

  38. Re:Huge waste of money by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

    Technically it wasn't perjury by a LOOOONNNNG stretching of the rules. And, anyways, what did you expect : Mr. President, did you diddle the chubby intern?

    "Uhhh.....no?"

  39. Re:Huge waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't waste your time. Your statements are unpopular, and as such, you won't be heard. A shame, but true.

  40. Blame the NRA by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its because of the NRA. As of lately they have been circulating propaganda saying Obama WILL make handguns illegal. Ask anyone who is a member or reads Guns 'N Ammo. I am all for private ownership of firearms and the second amendment but the NRA is overreacting here.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Blame the NRA by AaronHorrocks · · Score: 4, Informative

      In 1996, Obama said that he "supported banning the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns".

    2. Re:Blame the NRA by Nimey · · Score: 1

      If not the NRA, the wingnuts-at-large. I don't buy the propaganda; the worst that will happen is the re-banning of so-called "assault weapons".

      I will digress a moment: the political and military definitions of "assault rifle" are worlds apart. In the military world, an assault rifle is a small arm that fires intermediate cartridges (midway in power between pistol and full-size rifle cartridges, such as 7.62x39mm or 5.56x45mm) and is capable of firing semi-automatically and (full-auto or burst).

      The political definition includes (from Wiki):

      Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:

                      * Folding stock
                      * Conspicuous pistol grip
                      * Bayonet mount
                      * Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
                      * Grenade launcher (more precisely, a muzzle device which enables the launching or firing of rifle grenades)

      So much nonsense. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with any of those except for the grenade launcher. In fact, one may easily and legally obtain ex-Yugoslav SKS carbines which include integral grenade launchers, and integral folding bayonets, and which fire the 7.62x39mm intermediate cartridge, semi-automatically. They escape the assault-weapon classification because they have a ten-round fixed magazine.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:Blame the NRA by Nimey · · Score: 1

      That was 1996 when he was less experienced. Even if he still thinks that way, the Dems are a man short of a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. Don't get your panties in a wad.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:Blame the NRA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily the NRA. It's Obama, he's been the best gun salesman in history, believe it or not.

    5. Re:Blame the NRA by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      You always think they're one man short, but people will walk the floors, people won't show up. It's quite close to a majority, isn't it?

      Regardless, I don't think Obama would move to ban handguns. It's a lot of bad press that he doesn't need to get involved in. I don't think the americans would want a national gun registry, or limited firearms sales, like we have up here... Especially not at this point.

    6. Re:Blame the NRA by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It may well be true, but (gladly) US president is not an elected dictator, and doesn't get to write laws single-handedly. And it's unlikely that a nationwide ban would go through the Congress (and then not get shot down by the Supreme Court).

  41. Re:Huge waste of money by Leonard+Fedorov · · Score: 0

    It does in the short term, but printing money in this manner is a very slipperly slope to deep government debt and inflation.

  42. Re:Huge waste of money by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    Ok, so beat him with the lying America into war stick, or the disregarding his sole sworn duty to protect the Constitution stick.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  43. Pretty spectacularly loaded. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    If you want to note the impact of flat-panels. Image that command center with CRTs that size. You'd be popping tires left and right.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  44. Re:Huge waste of money by amRadioHed · · Score: 5, Informative

    Setting aside the obvious fact that the investigation was a multi-million dollar partisan witch-hunt, Clinton was in the end found to be not guilty.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  45. I for one... by tobiah · · Score: 1

    welcome our new holographic overlords!

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
  46. Excellent. by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    I feel safer already!

  47. Re:Huge waste of money by afaik_ianal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know that being impeached is not the same as being found guilty, right? You do realise Clinton was acquitted, right? It's like comparing two people who the public believe did something wrong: one has been ordered to stand trial, and acquitted; the other has not even been ordered to stand trial.

  48. Re:Huge waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He voted to give the telecoms immunity because they're so far in bed with the government nobody could risk discovery - it was a done deal and he voted for appearances. Bank bailout was impossible to vote against - collapse of the entire economy was at stake. He did made some noises so he could claim he was really against it if it all went to hell.

    He's a coward at heart; during the primaries he was for an immediate pullout from Iraq, now he's following Bush's schedule for withdrawing the troops because that schedule actually makes sense. The list goes on and on. The man has no spine and no clue other than what the opinion surveys tell him.

  49. big deal? by Eil · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now, I'm a pretty young whippersnapper (almost 30) but I cannot even recall reading about another presidential election that's generated this much hoopla. From the primaries, to the election, to the inauguration, it's all been full-throttle excitement. And not just from the press, but people on the street as well. Even my bigoted father and step-mother think he's just great.

    Is it because:

    A) He's the first halfway intelligent president our generation has seen?

    B) He has the most fucking fantastic marketing department ever?

    C) He's the first not-exclusively-white guy to take office?

    D) The Internet is enabling average people to express their opinions and reach out to each other more easily than ever before?

    E) Pretty much everyone wants Bush out of the White House, even the most right-leaning republicans?

    So are we witnessing history here (and not just because of the race thing) or has there been another presidential election with this much carnival atmosphere to the whole thing? This is a serious question. Ya know, for old people. (And historians.)

    1. Re:big deal? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      A) Whatever you think of his politics, Bill Clinton was as smart or smarter

    2. Re:big deal? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      E

      (ignore this bit of lame text to defeat the filter)

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    3. Re:big deal? by foobarb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      D, E, and

      F) He sounds like he believes and means what he says.

      Clinton is smart but he lies when he opens his mouth. Obama somehow gives off credibility and authenticity ... one would hope by being credible and authentic, but we shall see. Integrity is rare anywhere, and you don't expect to see it in politicians anymore, at least not at the P level, because we've had a bad run of those here lately.

      IIRC the Kennedy election events were very similar in tone (rock starish). More swooning girls then. Media was slow but there was less of it, so speeches were broadcast and people listened to them. Rhetoric was more formal and poetic then, but less reality based perhaps.

      Then, as now, there was a renewed hope for dramatic change for the better, an end to the war maybe, a generational shift to the younger, more progressive culture. The euphoria in these hopeful elections arises from the unexpected possibility that we (well, many of we) just might find ourselves in a world that better reflects our own values and priorities.

      Both then and now opportunities opened up for women and minorities to move closer to parity with WASP (white anglo-saxon protestant) men and to have a chance to have our issues raised. Again, after years of corporate greed and government spying, the people today have more common ground than they did in the Kennedy era though, whether they realize it or not. Interesting times.

    4. Re:big deal? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  50. Re:Huge waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, Bush lied. To Congress. And if they ever decide to call him out on it, he would actually be guilty of perjury, and for something that ultimately got a lot of people killed.

    Instead, the majority party in congress is taking the high road, something the Republican majority during Clinton's term failed to do.

  51. no, he didn't by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    In 1996, Obama said that he "supported banning the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns"

    He didn't say any such thing. You are referring to a questionnaire that a staffer filled out erroneously. You could try and argue that's a lie from the Obama camp, but then why should Ron Paul get a free pass on his racist newsletters that the good doctor has disavowed as someone else's work?

    The NRA is a hack organization. Gun nuts ran saying how they couldn't vote for Gore or Kerry because they supported gun control, completely ignoring the fact that Bush said he supported existing gun control laws and would re-sign the assault weapons ban. Or how Rudy Guiliani, who backed gun control more than any other candidate this cycle, spoke in front of the NRA and wasn't booed out of town.

    Sure, the NRA will stick up for your right to own a gun - but actually use the "ammo box" and you're on your own. The NRA doesn't lift a finger to help those who use guns in self defense against runaway law enforcement - see Randy Weaver and Cory Maye.

  52. Re:Huge waste of money by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    You mean Richard Armitage?

    Or Scooter Libby? Or Karl Rove? You know, the other guys who were leaking Plame's identity left and right, but Bush's cocksucking fanboys would have you believe it was only Armitage.

  53. Re:Huge waste of money by Uberbah · · Score: 4, Informative

    You don't follow politics much do you? Clinton got impeached for perjury, not for diddling the unattractive intern.

    Wrong. He was impeached because after the Republican Congress couldn't nail him for fraud (Whitewater) or murder (Vince Foster), or a parking ticket, they settled on a manufactured perjury charge.

    And Clinton didn't even lie, much less commit perjury.

  54. Missing Moderator option by FreshKarma · · Score: 2, Funny

    What I would give to be able to mod this +1, Crotchety

    --
    The future ain't what it used to be.
  55. Presidential Inauguration not very "GREEN" by sjs132 · · Score: 0

    Just because I've had some wool removed...

    Supposedly my new leader will lead a Green revolution and we will upgrade power, etc, to save the planet. Yet 2Million (est.) people flocking to one location and belching carbon along the way (directly or indirectly) seems to be rather counter productive to the message(s) put out their by the greenies that contributed a lot of grease to get this ball rolling...

    I wonder for the record if anyone will state how much estimated carbon was used to gather... how much to protect those gathered, and last of all, how much trash they all leave behind.

    I predict no coverage of these things other than thousands of "Ooohs and Ahhhs..." by the Genuflected masses... (And that is just the Media folks, not to mention the other people actually there to see this.)

    Sure, Google searches heat tea, but wouldn't it have been better (and safer?) for everyone to stay home and watch it on TV/WEB?

    Unless... Maybe the SUN and WATER vapor is the real source of 98% of all Greenhouse effects???

    --
    --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
  56. Re:Huge waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so beat him with the lying America into war stick, or the disregarding his sole sworn duty to protect the Constitution stick.

    Or maybe they can use the stick that is attached to the carrot that MoveOn.org is leading you with.

  57. Re:Huge waste of money by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    which one of the things he said was false, dickhead?

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  58. Re:Huge waste of money by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    no, his statements are a weasley technciality. people who keep pointing this "clinton lied! perjury!!!!" bullshit out should have their nuts cut off.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  59. Re:Huge waste of money by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    I think a lot of calls of "traitor" had something to do with China, Missiles, and Money. Nothing illegal, but something that riled a few.

  60. Re:Huge waste of money by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    Well last I checked treachery is illegal. For someone to call it treachery when he did nothing illegal I would say is astoundingly ignorant, and that's only what I'd say if I'm in a remarkably generous mood.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  61. Re:Huge waste of money by jabithew · · Score: 1

    Bush hasn't been found guilty either.

    Leaving aside the fact that he probably should be. I'm not sure what of, but there has to be something on the statute books, right?

    --
    All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
  62. Silverlight Player for PowerPCs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Attention everyone! There is a Silverlight 1.0 player available for PowerPC macs and Moonlight. Details here.

  63. Re:Huge waste of money by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Bush hasn't been found guilty either.

    But we know he's guilty. The law says X (warrantless wiretapping) and Y (torture) are crimes, and Bush has admitted to X and Y.

    I'm not sure what of, but there has to be something on the statute books, right?

    Yup, and it's possible that under a treaty signed by Reagan, we're even legally obligated to prosecute torturers.

  64. Re:Huge waste of money by splatter · · Score: 1

    Not if they can't open. There is a three block radius area closed to all traffic (IE foot & car) for three days around the convention center.

    All these businesses are defaulted closed since even if they get in there is no one else going to buy anything.

    That's just around the convention hall, not the entire dc, NOVA and MD area that is getting the old long and hard.

    I voted for him, but I'll be glad when it's over.

    --
    "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  65. Re:Huge waste of money by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    That's why this link is teh awesome.

  66. morons by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Millions of people aren't showing up because it's a big event, it's a big event because millions of people are showing up. Freedom of Assembly, and all.

  67. Re:Huge waste of money by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

    [insert owl pic here]O rly? Then pray tell why was Clinton disbarred? Oh, yeah b/c he lied under oath. Now as a good lawyer he should have found a way to avoid answer questions that weren't relevant to the case, but lying isn't one of them. So try your revisionist history somewhere else please.

    --
    I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  68. Re:Huge waste of money by seriesrover · · Score: 1

    I would have to agree...whats marring the inauguration is this constant venom and hatred for the previous administration. One might disagree and thats perfectly ok - but a facebook heading I saw "wish there was a statue of Bush, like there was Sadam, that we could knock down and pull through the streets". I also asked my brother-in-law what is it that you hate about Bush and where is the evidence to support your opinion...he replied "my opinion is evidence". Now there are some that can talk intelligently about what Bush has done wrong and cite evidence, but the overwhelming populace is riding on this hatred and when asked they don't seem to know why.

  69. Re:Huge waste of money by Uberbah · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh, yeah b/c he lied under oath.

    Read the link, bitch. The only way to prove he lied is to have literally read his mind.

    Then pray tell why was Clinton disbarred?

    Because after Whitewater didn't turn out, Vince Foster didn't turn out, and their bogus witch hunt didn't turn out, Republicans had to settle for something. Real justice would have been throwing Starr and the Republicans in Congress in jail for malicious prosecution.

    So try your revisionist history somewhere else please.

    That is the history. Clinton didn't lie, deal with it. In fact, if he had said he had "sexual relations" with Monica, that would have been a lie under the courts definition, as he didn't put his cock in her. Deal with it.

    Finally, just to prove how full of shit Republicans were and continue to be on this issue, just look at Scooter Libby's perjury conviction next to Clinton's perjury acquittal . You had the exact same cocksucking Republicans who argued for Clinton's removal from office arguing for a pardon for Scooter Libby. Hell, Fred Thompson - who voted to convict Clinton in the Senate - gave a hilarious speech where he passionately called for the rule of law and passionately called for a pardon for Libby.

    Seriously, Republican party membership should come with free visits to a proctologist, so you poor bastards can get some help pulling your heads out of your asses.

  70. Two questions by slapout · · Score: 1

    "The FBI has released images of some of the kit that will be deployed "

    1. I thought everyone loved Obama?

    2. Why would you release these photos? Wouldn't you want to keep the security secret?

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  71. Government on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the best reform might be to integrate "Ow! My Balls!" into coverage of the workigns of the Federal government.

  72. Re:Huge waste of money by peragrin · · Score: 1

    um under Bush we have given nearly 5 times the money to China that Clinton did.

    on top of that both stimulus checks were backed not by the american government but essentially the chinese government, as the american government has no money yet spends it like a waterfall.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  73. Re:Huge waste of money by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

    WTF? Where is all this hate coming from? You're like the little kid in preschool who when asked if he wants to play with the blocks or the ball, freaks out and goes into some bizarre, deranged screaming fit about the dinosaurs and the slide and cheerios. Other than you, who brought up republicans or democratics?

    I responded to a dumbass who said "clinton...blowjob...traitor" and "Bush... lied" with actual factual information. Nobody said Clinton is a traitor other than the original poster. He was however impeached for perjury. He was fined $90,000 for contempt of court. He did agree to give up his law license for five years. He did resign from the Supreme Court bar. He did pay Paula Jones $850,000.

    There's been a Democratic majority in Congress for the last two years and they haven't seen fit to impeach Bush. So all the ranting about his lying, etc. is just BDS.

  74. Re:Huge waste of money by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    WTF? Where is all this hate coming from?

    Once you've finished with that appointment with the proctologist, maybe you can read up on the last 10 years and see why people are tired of Republican bullshit.

    with actual factual information. Nobody said Clinton is a traitor other than the original poster. He was however impeached for perjury.

    No, this is factual information: he didn't lie under the courts definition. And even if he did lie, it wasn't perjury as perjury has to be relevant to the case at hand. As the judge ruled that whatever happened between Clinton and Monica was irrelevant to whatever happened between Clinton and Jones, it was completely impossible for Clinton to commit perjury over Monica. He could have said he had never seen her a day in life, and while it would have been a lie, it would not have been perjury.

    He was fined $90,000 for contempt of court. He did agree to give up his law license for five years. He did resign from the Supreme Court bar. He did pay Paula Jones $850,000.

    All of which he could have challenged given the facts. But he wanted to put the issue to bed, because who wants to worry about more lawsuits when you can start making $200,000 a speech?

    There's been a Democratic majority in Congress for the last two years and they haven't seen fit to impeach Bush.

    Their cowardice and complicity will be nice footnotes to Bush biographies in the future.

    So all the ranting about his lying, etc. is just BDS.

    Bush Fuctard Syndrome: the ability to pretend that the manufactured Clinton scandals were Very Serious Concerns, yet Bush admitting to violating habaes corpus and four Constitutional amendments is nothing to worry about.

  75. Re:Huge waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-clintonjonesperjury.html

    That's a mirror of a website set up years ago by a lunatic named Steve Kangas, who, having traveled across the country to murder Richard Mellon Scaife, ended up killing himself in a bathroom across from Scaife's office.