Slashdot Mirror


Can a Small Business Migrate Smoothly To OpenOffice.org v3?

Pay The Piper writes "As an IT Support Technician in a small corporation, I've been tasked by one of my managers to determine the feasibility of transitioning our small 40 or 50 person office from Microsoft Office 2000 to Open Office 3.0. What are some of the problems I may run into as far as document cross compatibility? Has the Open Office suite evolved to a point that permits easy transition from Microsoft's suite? Besides the obvious 'free vs. expensive' argument, what are some of the pros and cons of transitioning? Are there any reliable ways to view/edit/save a document saved in the OpenXML format through Open Office, or are my co-workers and I still going to be stuck in Microsoftland?" (Given that company-wide rollouts take some time to implement, this early look at the features of OO.o 3.1 may have some relevance, too.)

11 of 503 comments (clear)

  1. Why not pilot it with a small group first? by tubegeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pick a sample of users - some tech-savvy, some not - who interoperate with others still using microsoftware. A pilot should bring out the most pressing points of contact and show whether or not the compatibility level is adequate.

  2. Re:OpenXML Plug-In Exists for Novell's OO.o by gravos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a good analysis. Don't listen to the guys below who are just saying YES RAH RAH OPEN SOURCE and who have never worked in IT or had to deal with managers howling at them when a 10 year old document won't open correctly in a new software package.

    I love open source too, but let's be realistic here.

  3. Re:Entirely Depends On Your Integration by Magic5Ball · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For example do you have Word setup to access a database or something ridiculous like that?

    Mail merge is not usually an odd-ball feature for anyone who has more than a handful of friends or clients. As an aside and from experience, attempting to mail merge anything with over 3,000 rows in OOo generally results in pain.

    --
    There are 1.1... kinds of people.
  4. 50 people? No problem by Trojan35 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your biggest griper will be a finance guy (like me). For him, just buy excel. Forcing him to use something other than excel is cruel and unusual punishment.

  5. Re:Short and long answers? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your response to this disqualifies you as any kind of authority on this type of question. You are combative, hard headed and have absolutely no empathy for the folks you are supposed to be serving. As a manager, I would NEVER have this type of attitude towards people or allow that type of attitude to germinate in my department. You think your point of view is the only valid ones and anyone who disagrees is an idiot. frankly, you are the type of person that gives IT workers a bad name.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  6. Re:OpenXML Plug-In Exists for Novell's OO.o by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nothing handles MSOffice files well, not even other Microsoft applications. Their format is a mystery wrapped in an enigma enveloped by a binary blob.

  7. Re:OpenXML Plug-In Exists for Novell's OO.o by homesnatch · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Also, don't compare moving to OpenOffice to Office 2000... Compare it to Office 2007.

    The same whiners that will complain about OO will also complain about MS Office 2007... the GUI change is so drastic. OO's GUI is closer to Office 2000 than Office 2007 is.

  8. Re:OpenXML Plug-In Exists for Novell's OO.o by PitaBred · · Score: 5, Insightful

    MS Office doesn't even handle MS Office files. I've had Excel corrupt many spreadsheets itself, things I saved by Excel that the same app couldn't open again on the same computer.

    That said, OO.o is quite compatible with MSOffice if you don't get too insane with the formatting and such. I have yet to have someone have a problem opening a .doc with Word that I created in OO.o.

  9. Re:Short and long answers? by 644bd346996 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you're doing IT for people who's job descriptions require basic computer skills, it's perfectly okay to tell them to suck it up when they have to transition away from software that is one week shy of a decade old, particularly if you offer some training classes.

    Besides, when has it ever made sense to pamper employees who's skills are ten years out of date?

  10. Re:Short and long answers? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One thing I learned as a software developer, is you can create an application that conforms to specifications but is hated by the end users, even those who designed the spec. What I learned is that you need to take a lot of time up front, and talk with all of the users and other stakeholders. You need to listen to what they say and don't say and then you need to figure out what they really want. It is usually different than what they are expressly asking for. Part of that is respecting everyone in the process, regardless of their attitude. If you can demonstrate that you really want to give them what they need and will help them with that process, you will get very little of the backbiting that original poster expressed.

    Where does this begin? Nothing technical. Nothing taught in school. You have to sincerely respect people from all areas, not just the IT minded. Not just the higher ups. Everyone. Once you start with that frame of mind, doors open. Granted, sometimes it takes a conscious effort to get to that frame of mind. Sometimes, people rub you the wrong way.... they have agendas, and you have to take a deep breath and step back. But calling your users Luddites and worse sure ain't the way to go. Frankly, the attitude disgusts me.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  11. Re:OpenXML Plug-In Exists for Novell's OO.o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    which is why it is such a popular malware container. :)