Slashdot Mirror


Energy Star Program Needs an Overhaul

Martin Hellman writes "DeviceGuru.com ran my piece raising questions about the EPA's Energy Star program. For example, an Energy Star compliant TV that claims to draw 0.1 watts in sleep mode appears to do that — but only seems to sleep about 25% of the time that it is 'off.' The other 75% of the time it draws about 20 watts, for an effective sleep power draw from the user's perspective that is 150 times what the manufacturer claims. Based on the observations described, it is also questionable how many PC's really are sleeping when their screens are blank, even if the user has turned sleep mode on. Given the billions of dollars and tons of CO2 that are at stake, this situation demands more attention."

5 of 306 comments (clear)

  1. Fuck you Linus you fucking finnish shit eater!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Linus Torvalds is a god damn thief!!! When I installed Linux it asked me for my credit card number. Two days later I got a call from Wachovia asking me if I had purchased $400 worth of Totino's pizza rolls and Mountain Dew (I hadn't). Let this be a warning to all of you out there on the Internet.

    BTW FRIST POST

  2. Re:Fuck you Linus you fucking finnish shit eater!! by FooAtWFU · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Linus Torvalds is a god damn thief!!! When I installed Linux it asked me for my credit card number. Two days later I got a call from Wachovia...

    Stop! I see the problem right there. Wachovia. They'll walk all ova' ya.

    And with the recent acquisition, I must say, they're a perfect match for Wells Fargo. Last I checked neither of the two believed in paying interest on savings accounts.

    ;)

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  3. Re:Sorry, this troll isn't very good. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    He's doing better than most. Right now, he's at +3 Funny, which is pretty good by the standards of useless "FRIST POST!", Frosty piss, etc. types.

    Then again, not everyone can be me.

    Yeah, I'm still basking in the warm glow. It's keeping me nice and toasty this winter ;)

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  4. Re:Sorry, this troll isn't very good. by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Then again, not everyone can be me.

    BadAnalogyGuy keeps up pretty well.

  5. Re:You Fool! by twostix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You dont "recall", well that's a shame. Good thing about the internet, people like you can no longer revise history and muddy the waters after a large event happens. Five seconds of research shows that you're quite simply a reactionary apologist.

    There was no shortage of scientists and doctors at every level willing to promote the ridiculous message that mass pandemic was imminent.

    Here's a few examples from five seconds on google proving that your assertation that "only the media said we would all die of bird flu" is at best ignorance, at worst a bold faced lie:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4346624.stm
    http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,345165,00.html
    http://www.satyamag.com/feb06/greger.html
    http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/03/17/the_cost_of_bird_flu_hysteria/

    "The chief avian flu coordinator for the United Nations, Dave Nabarro, said last fall he was "almost certain" a bird flu pandemic would strike soon, and predicted up to 150 million deaths. The U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Mike Leavitt, advised Americans to stockpile cans of tuna fish and powdered milk under their beds in case of an outbreak. Renowned flu expert Robert Webster has said society needs to face the possibility that half of the population could die in a bird flu pandemic."

    Nice weasel words there by the way "non-medical scientists" lol so medical scientists opinions on a medical issue are irrelevant? How convenient, lets ask some geologists then and perhaps an astronomer too, it's they who have the 'real' insight.

    I think it may be you who is lacking in understanding of the scientific method.

    Rule number one, never make an assertation without a shred of evidence.