Slashdot Mirror


RAM Disk Puts New Spin On the SSD

theraindog writes "Although the solid-state storage market is currently dominated by flash-based devices, you can also build an SSD out of standard system memory modules. Hardware-based RAM disks tend to be prohibitively expensive, but ACard has built an affordable one that supports up to 64GB of standard DDR2 memory and features dual Serial ATA ports to improve performance with RAID configurations. And it's driver-free and OS-independent, too. The Tech Report's in-depth review of the ANS-9010 RAM disk pits it against the fastest SSDs around and nicely illustrates the drive's staggering performance potential with multitasking and multi-user loads. However, it also highlights the device's shortcomings, including the fact that SSDs are more practical for most applications."

6 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. What I learned from the article by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 5, Insightful
    • Most tasks are not disk IO-bound
    • Despite the fact that this device uses DDR2 RAM running at more than 6 GB/sec, it can not saturate 2 SATA interfaces
    • Why bother?
    1. Re:What I learned from the article by Forge · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This brings up an interesting idea.

      What if the ramdisk function was moved into the motherboard chipset? This would achieve 2 things:

      1. It would dramatically cut the cost of a ramdisk. I.e. The cost of the entire motherboard might go up by $5 or so.

      2. It would eliminate that SATA bottleneck, allowing ramdisk to run at full RAM speed.

      If you then figure out a way to have this data loaded to the ramdisk from a hard drive at poweron (or get realy clever and mount a flash chip on or near each DIMM which takes a backup of that DIMM, just before powerdown.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  2. I RTFA and now speculate by moteyalpha · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems that with a little firmware it could be coaxed to do some content addressability. Considering that it is 10x faster inside than the peak of the SATA interface. It seems to me that there is a lot of potential. I always liked the ram disks when they were popular ISA cards and this could be the thing that could use the full power of USB 4.0 [sic]. Applications could be changed to take advantage of this speed. If lists and SQL databases could be sorted on the drive without CPU overhead, it could be very useful.

  3. Re:Great for swap and /tmp by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The whole thing is pointless - why not just put 64GBs of ram in your PC and let it fill it up with disk cache. This makes no sense. If you compare this thing to just putting the RAM in your PC there are NO upsides. The data is vulnerable, it's massively expensive and an inefficient use of the RAM modules. Madness.

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  4. Re:Great for swap and /tmp by cyberjock1980 · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you compare this thing to just putting the RAM in your PC there are NO upsides.

    Ok...
    1. Find me a motherboard that has 8 RAM slots that doesn't require expensive ECC and/or Registered memory
    2. Find me a computer that can boot from it's own RAM drive.
    3. Find me a computer that can use a RAM drive that can be persistent through reboots without having to save the contents to something else.

    I have several of these, and I run a power cord that is normally used for one of those SATA/IDE to USB kits in the back of my computer to power my box.

    You don't think about all of the uses that this thing offers.

  5. Son of iRAM by (H)elix1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got one of these in our lab, and can answer questions on it. Had both units... the 6 slot version and the 8 slot version. This thing is the spiritual successor of gigabytes's iRAM. It takes bog standard DDR2 RAM as storage and lets you connect it as a SATA drive.

    A few of the things it improved on the old iRAM.

    *DDR2 supported ram, with 6-8 slots, taking up to 4G sticks.
    *A fair sized battery.
    *A CF backup slot.
    *RAID friendly, multiple SATA ports on 8 slot model.
    *Uses 5.25" bay rather than PCI slot.
    *ECC

    First off, no special device driver was needed - the drive was OS agnostic. Every mainboard and controller card I used saw it the device like any other SATA hard drive you might plug in.

    The RAM slots take bog standard DDR2 RAM. The documenation mentions speeds of 400/533/667/800 are all supported. Benchmarks with 533 and 800 grade RAM produced identical benchmarks, so faster RAM does not appear to have any impact. I also mixed and matched faster and slower DDR2 modules without issue.

    Just like most mainboards, the RAM needed to be installed in pairs if over one stick was used.

    Unbuffered ECC or non-ECC modules are both supported. Registered RAM was not. I tried to pull eight 4GB sticks from one of my Sun boxes to give the 'full montey' test. No joy. Had to stick with the far cheaper RAM.

    There was an interesting option for these who wanted to have ECC but used 'regular' non-ECC RAM. Eleven percent of the memory could be reserved for error correction. Again, all hardware based - just move a jumper. Performance metrics between ECC and 'simulated ECC' had negligible differences.

    The 8 slot model has two SATA ports. By setting a jumper, you could have the entire RAM capacity as one large drive on one SATA port or split it as two independent drives. If you splid the drive you had to have an even number of RAM sticks installed. Another jumper would dumb the interface down to SATA1 speeds rather than SATA2. Never tested that....

    Did test RAID-0, however. (grin) The synthetic benchmarks don't hit this device's sweet spot - database usage. Reads are fast. Writes are just about as fast. The RAID controller really makes a difference, as my 3Ware card performed significantly faster than with the mainboard based RAID. Using a EVGA 780i mainboard, it was not crushingly faster than a trio of velociraptors.

    For anyone who has installed XP, you know the wait between hitting the 'workgroup' and the first reboot? Just over two minutes. By far the fastest install I've ever done. The OS also started faster than any other disk or SSD system I've used.

    The CF bay was a nifty option. The question came up - what if I want to shut my machine down overnight? You can. If you have a CF card with more capacity than your RAM, it will back up the disk image automagically. You can also push a button to back up the current 'drive image' to CF, and another to restore the image. (I was able to go back and forth from Linux and Windows very easily).

    Anyhow, tis a fantastic high speed scratch disk or OS disk when write speed matters. For those of us who already maxed out RAM, this covers the gap between RAM drive sharing RAM with the mainboard and fast disk.