Slashdot Mirror


Obama Edicts Boost FOIA and .gov Websites

Ian Lamont writes "The Electronic Frontier Foundation and the National Security Archive are praising President Obama's executive orders to make the federal government more open. Yesterday, Obama issued two memos and one executive order instructing government agencies to err on the side of making information public and not to look for reasons to legally withhold it. The moves are expected to make it easier for people to file Freedom of Information Act requests, and should also boost the amount of information that agencies place on their websites. The general counsel for the National Security Archive (an NGO that publishes declassified documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act) even predicts that agencies will use blogs to share information. Obama's directives reverse a 2001 memo from former US Attorney General John Ashcroft instructing federal agencies to generally withhold information from citizens filing FOIA requests."

6 of 400 comments (clear)

  1. FOIA change: excellent... by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now maybe I'll file a FOIA request with the BATFE to reveal the NFA registry contents (with personal names & addresses redacted, of course) to demonstrate errors and abuses, especially involving 922(o). Don't see how, under this EO, they could say "no". Results could be VERY interesting...

    (If you don't grok that, Google is your friend.)

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
  2. Obama's Staff Trims robots.txt by CrtxReavr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I found this very interesting:

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/robots.txt

    The WhiteHouse.gov website's robots.txt file has been trimmed to:

              User-agent: *
              Disallow: /includes/

    Under previous administrations it was pages long. I suppose this may bode well for openness.

    -CR

    --
    "So is the BSD licence even more 'free' (than GPLv2)? Yes. Unquestionably." --Linus Torvalds (TinyURL.com/2vugzl)
  3. Re:Alien Technology? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The U.S. military is experimenting with secret but terrestrial technologies there.

    The frustrating part is that the successes of Area 51 are a matter of public record. The U-2 flew out of Area 51, the SR-71 flew out of Area 51, the F-117 was developed out of Area 51. With all these planes known to come out of Area 51, you'd think that people would give up on the whole "aliens from Roswell" thing. There are no flying saucers coming out of that area. Merely highly classified projects throughout the Cold War. There's even evidence to suggest that Area 51 operations have wound down in today's post cold-war culture. (See the government's official admission of Area 51's existence in 2003 for an example.)

  4. Re:"Open" by bladesjester · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It took about 6 hours before it showed up on the site.

    Hate to break it to you, but that's damn quick *especially* when you consider that it was the first day and they were still having issues with some of the staffers even being able to access the White House.

    Grow up and use some common sense. Reporting takes a little bit of time. It doesn't just happen the moment the event occurs.

    --
    Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  5. Re:can we request the torture vids? by GooberToo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They could and should have refused to execute their orders.

    How do you know they didn't? Very possible such a refusal would have resulted in one of the following scenarios; jail, very dangerous front line assignment, or placement beside the prisoner.

    Refusal to execute an order in the military is a life altering decision in the best of places. During wartime, it can be a life ending decision.

  6. Re:Executive Orders 13233 & 12667 by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Holy shit...

    Sec. 4. Concurrence by Incumbent President.
    Absent compelling circumstances, the incumbent President will concur in the privilege decision of the former President in response to a request for access under section 2204(c)(1). When the incumbent President concurs in the decision of the former President to request withholding of records within the scope of a constitutionally based privilege, the incumbent President will support that privilege claim in any forum in which the privilege claim is challenged.

    Have I gone batty, or did Redneck Nero actually presume to dictate the actions of subsequent presidents there???