Slashdot Mirror


White House Exempts YouTube From Web Privacy Rules

An anonymous reader writes "The new White House website privacy policy promises that the site will not use long-term tracking cookies, complying with a decade old rule prohibiting such user tracking by federal agencies. However, Obama's legal team has quietly exempted YouTube from this rule. Visitors to the official White House blog will receive long-term tracking cookies whenever they surf to a web-page with an embedded YouTube video — even those users that do not click the "play" button. As CNET reports, no other company has been singled out and rewarded with such a waiver."

13 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Re:whitehouse.gov by grantek · · Score: 1, Funny

    Next up, a FF extension to take a blacklist of domains and insert random data into cookies that are requested by them. name=LOGIN_INFO content=osamaobamabombnukebananarama

  2. Re:OH NOES! PANIC! by Obama · · Score: 3, Funny

    The orbital mind control laser. You know too much.

  3. Re:OH NOES! PANIC! by AioKits · · Score: 5, Funny

    To be fair, I voted for Obama because his campaign here in Oklahoma promised me cookies would follow if he became President. I guess this is close... I was kind of hoping for chocolate chip.

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  4. Re:whitehouse.gov by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hum.... nuked bananas.... <drool> /Homer

  5. Re:whitehouse.gov by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmm... naked Bananarama... /me

  6. Re:They can't control external websites by FiloEleven · · Score: 4, Funny

    Smoking is bad for you. Here, we bake it into cookies. You want one?

  7. Re:The only reason by tbannist · · Score: 2, Funny

    If that's all the he does to pay back his 4th largest contributor, that'd put him in contention for least corruption politician ever.

    I don't think shows anything other than Obama's web staff like using YouTube on the White House web site.

    --
    Fanatically anti-fanatical
  8. Re:This is disturbing... by Firehed · · Score: 2, Funny

    From TFS, it sounds like you may get long-term cookies from whitehouse.gov (regardless of what youtube.com provides) on pages (or paths I suppose; I don't think you can do page-specific cookies) containing embedded youtube videos. It could use some additional clarification for sure.

    Naturally, I didn't read TFA either.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  9. Re:OH NOES! PANIC! by sheph · · Score: 5, Funny

    You think that's bad??? I'm still waiting for my CHANGE!!!

    --
    I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
  10. One more reason for them to not use YouTube by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Funny

    I said that YouTube was a bad idea early on, because of the discrepancies between YouTube's policies and the policies surrounding government content. You cannot save YouTube videos on your hard drive without violating their TOS. This is another example of the discrepancy. Disturbingly, this administration is not pushing YouTube to modify their policies for the White House channel.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  11. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh, great. You've slashdotted a whole country.

  12. Re:They can't control external websites by Briareos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah I did not know about that change until...just now.

    But... change is what Obama promised all along - and now you act surprised? :*P

    np: The Whitest Boy Alive - Done With You (Dreams)

    --

    "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  13. Re:OH NOES! PANIC! by recharged95 · · Score: 2, Funny
    What would happen if you got your change and it was in euros! That would be change you can't believe in...

    ,

    ,

    (well unless you're in Europe).