Slashdot Mirror


RIAA Threatens Harvard Law Prof With Sanctions

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "Unhappy with Harvard Law Professor Charles Nesson's motion to compel the deposition of the RIAA's head 'Enforcer', Matthew J. Oppenheim, in SONY BMG Music v. Tenenbaum, the RIAA threatened the good professor with sanctions (PDF) if he declined to withdraw his motion. Then the next day they filed papers opposing the motion, and indeed asked the Court to award monetary sanctions under Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure."

20 of 333 comments (clear)

  1. Your Honor by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your Honor, we would like you to impose sanction against him. He's not supposed to fight back. Please punish him for fighting back. Our strategy doesn't work when intelligent lawyers fight back. This must be put to an end right now.

    Pathetic RIAA.

  2. Re:modern version of sending pictures by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Stop this (perfectly legal thing) or our teams of lawyers will fuck up your life" seems to be the new iteration of having thugs beat up a family member or sending pictures of your kids playing outside.

    I may consider stopping the kids from playing outside if they sent me those pictures of the lawyers beaten up by the thugs.

  3. RIAA reaching new heights of credibility by meist3r · · Score: 4, Funny

    First they get the live online-coverage of one of these processes postponed. Now they try to legally blackmail the defense lawyer. What's next?

    "That's an awfully nice courtroom you have here, your honor. Wouldn't it be terrible if something happened to it?"

    Jeez, I hate these guys.

    1. Re:RIAA reaching new heights of credibility by meist3r · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well you're right. English is not my primary language and even though my vocabulary is pretty good (I even knew extortion) sometimes I mix stuff up. So cut me some slack please?

      If you don't I'll black-extort you.

    2. Re:RIAA reaching new heights of credibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is no one reminded of the Monty Python skit?

      "Sure is a nice army base you have here, Colonel. It would be a shame is something....happened to it"

  4. Re:When the client is a lawyer ... by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a thing of beauty, but I suspect it's not legal.

    As always.

    Wait, this isn't the britsh pedophiles topic.

  5. Simple ? by unity100 · · Score: 3, Funny

    its legal suicide.

  6. Re:Who is this guy, & why does he not want to by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    why is he - or his legal team, taking such extraordinary steps to avoid testifying?

    Because he's so morbidly overweight that he's no longer able to leave his bed. That and the bad hair plugs keep him from going out in public. Oh, and he's got one of those crazy eyes where you can't tell where he's looking and he knows everybody on the internet will put his testimony on YouTube and laugh at him and leave mean comments. He's really a very sensitive soul and if you met him you'd like him, except for the horrible odor that comes from his unwillingness to bathe due to his persistent aquaphobia.

    That, and if he showed his face he'd be in more danger than Barack Obama at a Klan meeting.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  7. Re:Who is this guy, & why does he not want to by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It is not legal, ethical or cool to copy somebody else's CD for your own use."

    Oh, come on. It is kind of cool.

    You know it is.

    And even cooler is copying DVDs. You can have like thousands of movies in perfect quality, and the best part is that Mr. Oppenheim (if that is his real name) and his Rothchild/Bavarian Illuminati/Reptilian/Council on Foreign Relations/Banking Cartel buddies don't get a single red cent.

    And the fun with Blue-Ray is just starting.

    Now that's really cool.

    Seriously, who's doing the RIAA's public relations?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  8. Re:Attorney-Client Privelidge by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm in the antivirus industry. I'm used to unwinable wars and fighting them. Bring it on.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Re:modern version of sending pictures by digitig · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it saves one lawyer! Er, hold on...

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  10. Re:Capitalism at it's best. by Hatta · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they sanction this guy under Rule 37, we should sanction the RIAA under Rule 34.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  11. Re:Uhg by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Funny
    And, apparently, totally lacking in skills at grammar and spelling.

    Actually I thought it was great. Read it with "A Russian Accent", like it's Boris Badanov speaking - "Muzt get Mooose end Sqvurel" and it all makes perfect sense!

    ""Thoss who try tu mek a leeving out of it, are quite heartless cynic pipple. But breeelliant, talented cynic pipple."

    See? :-)

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  12. Re:Grasping at straws by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone either sounds nervous, or a poor loser.

    Or both.

    --
    Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
  13. Re:Who is this guy, & why does he not want to by PReDiToR · · Score: 4, Funny

    They who can give up essential backups to obtain a little temporary convenience, deserve neither data integrity nor security.

    Apologies Mr Franklin.

    --

    Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  14. Good thing it wasn't rule 34 by mcbutterbuns · · Score: 2, Funny

    Could you imagine what would have happened if they would have invoked rule 34 of the internet?

    1. Re:Good thing it wasn't rule 34 by KingAlanI · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would have redefined "legal brief", there would have been a motion called "of the ocean"...

      [scrubs out mind now]

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  15. Re:You don't get it, do you? by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 4, Funny

    if the allegations in their motion are true

    You must be new here.

    --
    Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
  16. Re:Who is this guy, & why does he not want to by Chabo · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... did... did you just call Courtney Love a good musician?

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  17. Re:Who is this guy, & why does he not want to by hedwards · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe that's Hooray for boobies.