Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Teleport Information Between Ions a Meter Apart

erickhill writes with word that scientists from the University of Maryland have successfully transferred information from one charged atom to another without having it cross the intervening space of about one meter. The academic paper is available in the journal Science, though it requires a subscription to see more than the abstract. Scientists have previously teleported unmolested qubits between photons of light, and between photons and clouds of atoms. But researchers have long sought to teleport qubits between distant atoms. Light's high speed of travel makes photons good transporters of information, but for storing quantum information, atoms are a much better choice because they're easier to hold on to. 'This is a big deal,' comments Myungshik Kim, a quantum physicist at Queen's University Belfast in the United Kingdom. 'To store information as it is in quantum form, you have to have a teleportation scheme available between two stationary qubits. Then you can store them and manipulate them later on.'"

14 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. Scientists Teleport Information Between Ions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are they positive?

    1. Re:Scientists Teleport Information Between Ions by weirdo557 · · Score: 2, Funny

      its uncertain

  2. Unmolested? by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists have previously teleported unmolested qubits....

    Qubit molester insists entanglement was consensual, stay tuned for details at 11.

    1. Re:Unmolested? by jd · · Score: 5, Funny

      In breaking news, the molester has been ordered to both sign and not sign the Atomic Sexual Deviancy Register at the same time.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Unmolested? by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unfortunately, as the molester was observed complying with these requirements, it was determined that the molester only completed one of them.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    3. Re:Unmolested? by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 4, Funny

      Police efforts to detain the molester for questioning have been hindered by the fact that, despite knowing the molester's exact speed, his location can not be ascertained.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
  3. Bah! by GaryOlson · · Score: 5, Funny

    My mother always knew what I had done without anyone telling her. Or whatever I was going to do before I took action. I hear other mothers have the same ability. Therefore, all mothers must exist in some state of constant quantum communication with each other.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  4. Re:A quantum physicist? by ozphx · · Score: 4, Funny

    You mean a qubit molester?

    --
    3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
  5. Re:Sounds neat, but I'm confused... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's like sending someone an encrypted message over an insecure channel. Great until you realize you now have to send him the key over the same channel. Sure it's encrypted, but the means of making it useful renders it ineffective.

    Sure you can, you just need to use public key encryption. So I guess you're saying we need public key quantum entanglement?

    Just kidding, thanks for the clarification. :)

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  6. Re:Sounds neat, but I'm confused... by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Which goes to prove that teleporting physicists have lost their marbles.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  7. Damn... by fenix849 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok, who voted for the beammeupscotty tag?

    I can't think of a worse place to be beamed, than 'up scotty'.

  8. Re:Sounds neat, but I'm confused... by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You could send something as simple as a yes/no - yes, I've read your message , or no, I haven't. [snip] Someone who understands it better, correct me and be more clear, please."

    Analogy:
    I have two basket balls, one has a cat inside - I don't know which one.
    I send one basket ball to you.
    I open my basket ball (observation).
    I find it empty so I can deduce the cat is in yours (no information is transfered to you).
    I cannot tell if you have opened yours and observed the cat as dead or alive.
    You open yours and find a dead cat (observation).
    Information is transfered in the normal manner when you call me up and ask why I sent you a dead cat in a basketball.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  9. Re:Sounds neat, but I'm confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Lightspeed? Pfft. It is at Ludicrous Speed!

  10. Re:Sounds neat, but I'm confused... by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny
    Yeah, I know a little about Quantum, but this kind of teleportation stuff still confuses me. I know there is some kind of logic argument that shows that no actual information can be relayed by this means, but how exactly is the information being transfered? Is it at lightspeed, or something weirder?

    More importantly, does this kind of teleportation make the same cool sound as the teleportation the original "Star Trek"?