Slashdot Mirror


KDE 4.2 Is Released

OhReally writes "It's a great day for Free Software: KDE, the desktop environment for Linux, Windows, Mac, and (Open)Solaris, has just reached version 4.2, exactly a year since the release of 4.0. This is a version suitable for broad usage, with many improvements all across the board, and lots of bugfixes. You can leave a comment or congratulate the developers here."

6 of 488 comments (clear)

  1. Thanks to the KDE 4 Devs! by CajunArson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been tracking the 4.2 betas on Kubuntu's repositories, and the final release is working very nicely. KDE 4.2 is finally at a stage where the 4 series can replace the 3.5 series for the large majority of users, and I've been using KDE since 2.0 came out.

    Now I know there are going to be a ton of complaints about how "broken" KDE 4 is... but I have my own response to the critics. Is KDE 4.2 perfect? No, but I challenge you to show me a desktop that is "perfect". KDE 4 has finally gained critical mass, and even more great stuff is in store.

    Thanks again to all the KDE 4 developers and bug testers who kept working even when it wasn't easy or popular! Your perseverance has paid off.

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
  2. Re:Woah by Ilgaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't there a way to detect CPU/Gfx card acceleration capabilities and disable them in certain conditions? E.g. if there is no hardware support for transform and lighting?

    Windows does it, OS X does it. It would prevent a lot of criticism. Not sure about CPU detection but at least OpenGL should give tips about hardware in multi platform manner and it could be scaled to support OpenGL ES in future (on PDA etc.).

  3. Re:No Critisism of F/OSS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Windows users and OSX users are going to attack Linux users on every front in every way endlessly and relentlessly.

    I don't know if that's real fair to say. Linux users have a stigma (right or wrong) of being egotistical holier-than-thou types, from the new user newsgroups and IRC channels, all the way to here. Linux users are very quick to point out why your way sucks and why their way is better and clearly more superior, even if your only fault is that you use a different text editor. Moreover, the entire site of Slashdot is one big Microsoft troll, right down to the sarcastic and biased headlines and summaries, through to the tired 1-line comments marked +5 (has anyone made a joke about how Balmer likes to throw chairs lately?)

    I don't see a lot of Windows and OSX users going around attacking Linux users. I do see a lot of Linux users who go around attacking anything that doesn't involve compiling your operating system.

  4. Re:Woah by Jurily · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gee, the fact that they explicitly say "don't use this, not for end users", and you can't fucking read makes it their problem?

    The fact they named it 4.0 is much louder than whatever they said.

    Remember how Wine took a decade to reach 1.0? That's what we expect from Open Source. You can scream and bitch all you want, but if you named it .0, it's your fault if it sucks.

  5. Re:1 question by mpyne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish the KDE fanboys (and the KDE developers themselves) would stop trying to rewrite recent history and just admit there were mistakes made.

    There were mistakes made.

  6. Re:Woah by drx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Why should they label it based on your expectations?"

    Because this is what communication is about.