Slashdot Mirror


US House Kills Proposed Delay For Digital TV Transition

An anonymous reader writes "The Digital TV transition delay bill has failed to pass the United States House of Representatives. By a vote 258 to 168 in favor of changing the date, the bill has failed as two-thirds of the votes are required for it to pass. The delay bill was once perceived as inevitable, [but the House] has now apparently made February 17th the date of transition once again. Now the question remains, will they attempt to pass it again by the deadline?"

6 of 664 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Who cares? by hansamurai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Senate wants to allow procrastinators to procrastinate even longer, House doesn't.

  2. Networks want to delay by TreyGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the Houston Chronicle this morning there was an interesting blurb about the delay. Basically, the networks want to delay the switch-over because they don't want it to happen in the middle of the season. They are afraid of losing viewers (and thus advertising dollars) from people who aren't ready for DTV. They'd rather wait until spring/summer when they are airing re-runs.

  3. Re:A simple answer by Rinisari · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One Subject at a Time Act by Downsize DC would prevent that!

    Call your Congresspeople and tell them to support it!

  4. Hawaii already switched... what's the big deal? by leonbev · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hawaii already made the switch to digital TV on January 15th. I haven't heard any newa about their state having any major problems with this transition, so why are they making a big deal about this now?

  5. Re:Who cares? by DrVomact · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I got fucked by this crappy legislation.

    How come you feel that the government owes you a converter box in the first place? You don't have to watch TV. (In fact, I don't know why anyone would want to, but that's a separate issue.) Watching TV is not necessary for your well-being. You obviously have a computer, or access to one, so you can get your news off the internet, or that old-fashioned thing called "radio". (NPR actually does a pretty good job of reporting the news ever since the Republicans spanked them back in the 80s).

    So, why does the government owe you a converter? If it weren't for the government, TV programs would have been exclusively digital before this. Maybe you have good reasons, and I'm missing something, but I'd like to hear what they are.

    --
    Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  6. Re:Who cares? by afidel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Because the government seized a public asset (the radio spectrum) and sold it to a private entity (the entertainment and telecommunications companies) and so they have some responsibility to make the public whole.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.