Slashdot Mirror


Fannie Mae Worker Indicted For Malicious Script

dfdashh writes "A former Fannie Mae contractor has been indicted by a federal grand jury in Baltimore, MD for computer intrusion. He attempted to propagate a malicious script throughout the company's 4,000 servers. The DC Examiner has details of the incident: 'Had this malicious script executed, [Fannie Mae] engineers expect it would have caused millions of dollars of damage and reduced if not shutdown operations at [Fannie Mae] for at least one week. ... The virus was set to execute at 9 a.m. Jan. 31, first disabling Fannie Mae's computer monitoring system and then cutting all access to the company's 4,000 servers, Nye wrote. Anyone trying to log in would receive a message saying "Server Graveyard." From there, the virus would wipe out all Fannie Mae data, replacing it with zeros, Nye wrote. Finally, the virus would shut down the servers.'"

9 of 325 comments (clear)

  1. Re:erase my mortgage by internerdj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The more important question for me is if my mortgage gets erased do the records that I'm at least part owner of the property get erased or does the company just get the deed to my home? Well it was mortgaged, but we don't have the records anymore we'll just assume you owe the full purchase value of the property until you can prove otherwise.

  2. Interesting Comment in TFA by tristanreid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Of course it isn't verifiable, but I thought this was interesting:

    H1B#36a: "What wasn't reported was that the contractor was fired for writing a script poorly, that caused the failover over of a number of High-Availablitity production servers. His "landmine/timebomb" script was found through his same poor scripting skills. Whatever doping manager that hired that guy should be fired too, along with his director and VP!"

    -t.

  3. Re:Disappointing... by anagama · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Them loosing their records would simply mean that suddenly the banks would run out of 'liquid assets' to make loans with. Who do you think that would hurt: The average joe or the banks?

    It seems to me that banks making loans over the last four years IS THE major problem. Had they not been able to, we wouldn't have had a baseless boom, Angelo Mozillo, a gazillion dollar bailout of the wealthiest individuals, and schemes to assist the most foolish "housing investors" -- all at my expense. I too am rather disappointed the script was found and I don't even have a mortgage. I refused to get caught up in the housing bubble choosing instead to wait for a return to normalcy, which turned out to be a mistake. What I should have done is bought a house way more expensive than I could afford on a negative amortization loan and let the government modify my interest rate and principal balance. I now realize that in America, prudence is punished and stupidity rewarded. So yeah, I'm actually very depressed the script didn't execute.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  4. Re:My goodness! It might have... by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...turned Fannie Mae into a financial failure

    ... which it never was during the 30 years from 1968 to 2000, roughly when banking deregulation took effect. It may be that such an institution is a bad idea, but you have to consider that financial institutions of all kinds are in desperate condition as well, so you can't use the financial disasters of 2008 as proof that Fannie is any worse an idea than, say, a private investment bank.

    The idea that Fannies failure shows that it ought never have been, applied consistently, would argue for nationalizing banks. I, as one who has been a staunch liberal though the long winter of liberal dispute, think nationalization is a terrible idea. This is not because the government is bad and business is good, but because government and business would be indistinguishable, leaving nobody to watch the foxes in the chicken coop.

    All in all, I think the widespread calamity in the financial sector more probably indicates that the particular kind of banking deregulation practiced in the post Gramm-Leach-Bliley era has at the very least unintended consequences.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  5. Re:Disappointing... by anagama · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So if Fannie Mae had NOT been able to buy the conforming loans, banks making stupid loans would have had less money available to them because they'd have to hold the conforming loans, and as a result, those banks would have made fewer stupid loans. Sounds to me like FM was part of the problem. Honestly, I'm pissed. I'd like to see the entire banking industry lined up against the wall, because all it has amounted to recently is a Federally sanctioned highway robbery program targeted against people who live within their means and act responsibly.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  6. Re:Disappointing... by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't go absolving Fannie Mae, their management was just as evil as anyone else's. Let's not forget their little, "oops we need to restate our income by a few billion dollars" fiasco. There were plenty of people in the FNMA Market Room who were playing fast and loose with mortgage backed securities.

  7. Re:Well, no, you still won't own your house by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 4, Interesting
  8. Re:Disappointing... by Chyeld · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Jesus FUCKING Christ on a stick.

    Would you honestly rather your kids live through another Great Depression (with the knowledge that neither of the "Great"s were solved by anything other wars so massive that they slaughtered good percents of the working base, thus removing the issue of unemployment) or with a devalued dollar and stable nation?

    STUPID is cutting your nose off just to spite your face, which is exactly the plan of action you are pushing for.

    STUPID is letting the whole thing go down the tubes and fucking everyone over just to hold on to your sense of pride over the fact that a few scam artists might get away with their scam. Not, mind you, have any of them actually made it to the clear yet.

    STUPID is waving the banner for your children while setting them up for a life of misery.

    And frankly, as STUPID as I consider your plan of action, since my life is also impacted by your STUPID, I'm not interested in hearing anymore. Take a tranquilizer or something for your stiff neck and let it go.

  9. Re:I see how he did it... by couchslug · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Of course, the way around this would be a "deadman switch" that required input NOT to trash the system.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."