Slashdot Mirror


Judge Rules WoW Bot Violates DMCA

An anonymous reader writes to tell us that Blizzard has added another victory in their campaign against World of Warcraft bots. A federal judge has ruled that not only did the Glider bot break the EULA, it can be classified as a circumvention device under the DMCA. "As we've noted before, Blizzard's legal arguments, which Judge David G. Campbell largely accepted, could have far-reaching and troubling implications for the software industry. Donnelly is not the most sympathetic defendant, and some users may cheer the demise of a software vendor that helps users break the rules of Blizzard's wildly popular role playing game. But the sweeping language of Judge Campbell's decision, combined with his equally troubling decision last summer, creates a lot of new uncertainty for software vendors seeking to enter software markets dominated by entrenched incumbents and achieve interoperability with legacy platforms."

10 of 498 comments (clear)

  1. Doesn't matter. by SuperBry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This will just be appealed, this was just a judge not understanding the difference between breaking a contract (EULA) and breaking a copyright.

    1. Re:Doesn't matter. by Chabo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That was several months ago. This is about a judge not understanding the difference between breaking a contract and breaking access-control mechanisms.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  2. Re:Hopefully there's a silver lining by Zironic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because they want to keep the other 70%?

  3. Re:Blizzard is doing a lot of damage to the indust by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They also have every right to run any manner of automated script or "bot" in lieu of physically sitting in front of their screen and hand-manipulating the character they've paid for the subscription to use on Blizzard's servers!

    Not as long as you share a game world. Though it's not physical, whenever people meet there are rules to follow. Even if you paid membership to a sports club, they could deny you access if you came there shirtless. They could throw you out if you're breaking the rules and being an ass. You can't wave your membership card in their face and say "You can't touch me, I've paid to be here!". Client software and bots are exactly the same as dress code and club rules. With single player games you can do whatever the fuck you want, just as you can in the privacy of your own home. WoW is not your home (or if it is, seek professional help).

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  4. Re:Hopefully there's a silver lining by Thinboy00 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is there even any point to the game if you can't even be buggered to play it yourself?

    --
    $ make available
  5. It's a *dumb* game, that's why this problem exists by hdon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one who is pretty disgusted at the trend of games where the primary skill function is just how much time your character spends doing stuff? It might as well just be an online store where you buy virtual skills and pay with your blood over firewire. Sacrifice your lives to something worthy, chumps! Develop some actual talents while you're at it!

  6. Re:Hopefully there's a silver lining by Alyred · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps the game does suck, that's for the individual playing to evaluate. However, since those people who use the bot to cheat interact with (and gain advantages over) those that do not, it ruins the enjoyment of others that have purchased the product when the terms explicitly state that such cheating is not allowed.

    See the Battlefield series.

    If someone wants to cheat on a singleplayer game, more power to them. But doing it in an environment where others are playing reduces the value of others who abide by the terms of service.

  7. Re:Hopefully there's a silver lining by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're not really free to do it. Otherwise you could stay there (as you would like to) but you can't. As you said they will throw you out.

    Freedom isn't about doing whatever you want with no repercussions. There are always repercussions which is the way it should be in a lot of instances.

    It's all well in good to say that you're free to say nigger and people are free to react in whatever way but the fact is the way they will react makes it more or less impossible to use the word in most cases. Secondly if you are free to do something wrong and people are free to retaliate then even if you have the freedom to use a WoW bot then Blizzard should have the freedom to stop you and protect the majority of their paying customers that dislike it.

    If it were a single player game where you only affected yourself then go nuts and do whatever you want but it's a multi-player game where people have to pay a monthly fee and if most people don't want it then the majority win. As I said Blizzard has the right to retain as many customers as possible.

    Whether or not the DCMA route was the right way to go about it may be debatable. Part of me does say they're not circumventing copyright protection but another part of me says that bot users in any game are scum so fuck 'em.

  8. Re:It's a *dumb* game, that's why this problem exi by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one who is pretty disgusted at the trend of games where the primary skill function is just how much time your character spends doing stuff?

    Go play a FPS and you'll find autoaim bots, wallhacks, and other assorted cheating tools. Corner a cheater and they'll complain about how they have a "real life" and can't spend all their time playing the game to get the skills to compete with other players. This is simply more of the same.

    There are thousands of folks who want instant gratification. Twitch monkeys who can't stand not being at the top of whatever hill they see but don't want to invest the time it takes to get there (nevermind that being at the top of the hill doesn't HAVE to be the point of a lot of these games). So they go for the short-cut.

    Yeah, treadmills and grinds aren't for everyone. But that doesn't mean you get to ditch the rules because they're inconvenient for you. Play the game... or don't play at all.

  9. Re:Hopefully there's a silver lining by Ghworg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We should reinstate the draft and send these people to some foreign country to get blown up. Or at the very least, basic training.

    Yes because it is much better when the annoying people are trained killers. Military training doesn't necessarily stop you being an inconsiderate twat.